PC 78-79;~
RESOLUTION N0. PC78-79
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMHISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICA710N N0. 77-78-55 BE GRANTED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commfssion did recetve a verifted
petitio~ for Reclassification frqn ROBERT M. LAW~ 13292 Ramona Drive, Garden Grove.
California 92640~ owner~ and PHILIP BORSUY.. 624 Tigertail Road, los Angeles,
Californta, 90049, a: ~t, of certain rcal property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, Sta~~ of California, described as foilows:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TONNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANC,E il
WEST IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, LOUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A HAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51 PAGE 11 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, BOUNDED
NORTHERLY BY THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NOP,TN4IEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF TNE NORTHSlEST QUARTER; EASTERLY BY THE WEST
LINE OF TNE EAST HALF OF SAID NORTHWEST QUAR7ER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTEP, OF THE NORTHIJEST QUART~R; SOUTHEASTERLY BY THE
NORTHVlESTERLY LINE OF TNE LAND CONVEYED TO THE ORANGE COUNTY fL00D
CONTROL DISTRIC7 BY DEED RECORDED JULY 7, 1960 IN BOOK 5317 PAGE
208, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; AND WESTERLY BY THE
EASTERLY LINE OF BEALH BOULEVARD AS CONVEYLD TO THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED JULY 25, 1951 iN BOOK 2208 PAGE 577 OF
SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Lommissfon did hold a public hearing at the CTty
Hall in the City of Anaheim on April 24, 1978, at 1:30 p.m.. notice of said publtc
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accorda~ce wtth the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipai Code, Lhapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evtdence for and against said proposed reclassification and [o investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, af[er due inspeciton, inves[igation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due conside:.-ation of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing. does ftnd and cletermine the following facts:
1. That the petitloner proposes reclassification of subJect property from
the RS-A-43,000 (Resident(al/Agricultural) 2one to the CL (Cortmecial, Llml[ed) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subJect property for general
commercial land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassificatlor~ of subject property is necessary
and/or desirabte for the ordcrly and proper development of the cormnunity.
4. That the proposed reclassificatlon of subJect property dces properly
relate to the zones and thelr permi[ted uses locally established in close proximTty
to subJect property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
5, That the proposed reclassificatlon of subJect property requlres the
Improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the CTrculation Element of the
PC78-79
General Ptan, due to the antlcipated increase in traffic which wi11 be generated by
the intensificatton of land use.
6. That no one indicated thetr oresence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence v~as rece{~ed in oppositTon to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT F~NDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
revtewed the subject proposal to reclassify the zoning from RS-A-43,000
(RE5IDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) to LL (LOMMERCIAL, LIMITED) on an irregularly-shaped
parce) of land consisting of approximately 1.0 acre having a frontage of
approximately 249 feet on the east side of Beach Boulevard, having a maximum depth of
approximately 280 feet, being located approximately 1085 feet north of the centerllne
of Orange Avenue. to construct a carpet store with watvers of the mTntmum number of
parking spaces; and does hareby approve the Ne9ative Declaration from the requirement
to prepare an environmental tmpact report on the basis that there would be no
signlficant individual or cumulat(ve adverse environmental impact due to the approval
of thls Negattve Oeclaration since the Anahefm Genersl Plan designates the subJect
property for general commercial land uses comnensurate with the proposal; that no
sensit(ve environmental tmpacts are tnvolved in the proposal; that the Initfai Study
submitted by the petittoner indicates no significant individual or cumula[ive
adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaratton substantlattng the
foregoing findings is on file in the Gity of Anaheim Planning Department.
NON, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED [hat the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subJect Peti[ion for Reclassificatlon and, by so doing. that Title
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to Gxclude the above-described
property from the RS-A-43,000 (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporate satd
described property into the CL (LOMMERCIAL, LIMITED) ZONE upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to ~he proposed use
of subJect propPrty in order to preserve Lhe safety and general welfare of the
Cittzens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That all englneeri~g requiremen[5 of the C(ty of Anahe(m along
Beach Boulevard (ncludi~g preoarailon of imp~oveme~t olans and Instatlation of all
improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street 9rading and paving,
drainage facil(ties or othar appurtenant work, shall be complied with as requtred by
the City Englneer and In accordance with standard plans and -,pecifications on fTle in
the Office of the City Engineer; that street iighting facilities along 8each
Boulevard shall be instalted prior to final buildtng and zoning inspections untess
otherwise approved by the Director of Publ(c UtTlitfes, and In accordance with
standard specifications on file in the Off(ce of the Dlrector of Public Utilities;
and/or that a bond, certificate of depustt. letter of credit, or cash~ in an amount
and form sattsfactory to the Ctty of Anaheim shall be posted with the CTty [o
guarantce [he installation of the above-mentioned requir~nents.
2. That [he owner(s) of subJect property shall pay to the Clty of Anahetm
the sum of 95 cents per front foot along Beach Boulevard for tree planting purposes.
3. That trash storage areas shal! be p~ov(ded irt accordance with approved
plans on fite wtth the Offlce of the Director of Public Uorks.
4. Thai fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chlef of the Fire Department prior to cortvnencement
of structural framing.
-z- Pc~3-79
~ ~
~.,` .
That appropriate water assessment fees as determtned by the Director of
Public Utslities shall be paid to the City of Anaheim prior to the ~ssuance of a
building permit.
6. 7hat a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the north and
east property Iines.
7, Prlor to the Introduction af an ordinance rezoning subJect property,
CondEtfon Nos. 1 and 2, above-menttoned, shall be comptetcd. The Provisions or
righks granted by this resolution shall become null and votd by action of the
Planning Commisslon unless satd conditions are complied with within one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
$, That CondiCion Nos. 3 and 6, above-mentloned~ shall be complted wTth
prior to final buliding and zoning inspections.
THE fOREG0ING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 24th day of
April, 1978.
~.~ /,~ ~~~
C~FAIRHA , ANAHE CIT PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~ /9~iLC~;a~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM LITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANG~ ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIH )
1, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim CTty PlannTng Commisston, do
hereby certify that the foregoTng resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim Clty Planning Commisslon heid on Apr11 24. 1978, at 1:34 p.m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES. DAVID, KING, TOLAR '
NOES; COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: JOHNSON~ LI~~N
1978,
IN ~11TNE55 4/HEREOF~ i have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of April~
~~ ~ ~
SECRETARY~ ANANEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC78-79