PC 79-115,
y
.
~ ,
RESOLUTION N0. PC74-1~5
A RESOLUTION OF TNE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C0141155101~
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATIOti N0. ~2-7~-44 E3E GRAIITED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commfssion dtd receive a verifted
petition for RPClassification from At~ANElM RED'cVELOPMENT AGEIICY~ 106 North Claudina
Street, Suite 400, Anaheim, California 92805, owner of certain real proper[y situated
in the City of AnaheTm, County oF Orange, State of California, described as follows:
That portlon lying within Block "H" of Thc New Subdivision of
Vi~e/ard Lot-D5~ as shown of a map recorded in Book 17, page 72 of
Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the hortherly line of said Block "H",
that is distant alcng said florthcrly line North 75° 27' 36" Eas[,
5G.47 fee[ from the Northwesterly corner of said Block "!1"; thence
along said Northerly line North 75° 27' 36" East, 27f.~4 feet to
the Northeasterly corner of said Block "N"; thence along the
Easterly llnc of said 31ock "11" South 14~ 27' 35" East, 288.57
feet to a point on a rontangent curve concave Northrresterly and
having a radius of 941.00 feet, at which point a radial iine of
said curve bears South 3~° 58~ ~+7" East. said curve is concentric
with and 59.00 feet ~lorthwesierly of that certain course in the
centerline of tha[ certain scrip uf land 110.00 fee[ wide for the
realignment of Lincoln Avenue, sald certatn course being a curve
concave Northwesteriy having a radius of 1000.00 feet and a
central angle of 25~ 4p' S2": thence Southwesterly along said
curve having a radius of 941.00 feet [hrough a central angle of 0°
06' 37" a dis[ance of 1.61 feet; thence South 59° 07' S~" West,
53.23 feet to a curve concave narthwesterly having a radius of
588.82 fec[; thencc Southwesterly along said curve through a
cenGra2 angle af E° 35' ~d" a dis[ance oF ~8.32 Peet Co :r cunpaurtJ
curve concave to the Nor[hwest havtng a radius of 945.00 fee[,
said compound curve ts concentric wlth and 55.A0 feet
Northwesterly of the af~rementioned certaln course havTng a radius
of t00Q.00 feet and a central angTe of 25° 4Q' S2"; thence
Sguthwesterly aiong said ceropound curve through a central angle of
7~4' 2~" a distance of 127.67 feet to a compound curve concave
to the Northcast I~aving a radius of 2G.00 feet; thence Westerly
along last said compound curve through a central angle of 90° 06'
20" a distance of 40.99 feet; thenca North 14~ 25' 44" West.
?.89.02 feet to a curve concave to the Southeast havtng a radius of
16,00 feet. sald curve is also [angent to the aforementioned
Northerly line of said Block "N"; thence Northerly along said
curve through a central angle of 89° 53' 20" a distance of 25.10
feet to the Poin[ of Beginning.
NHEREAS, the City Pianning Cormission did hold a publtc hea~Ing at the CTty
Hatl Tn the ~ity of Anahelm on June 18~ 1979~ at 1:30 p.m.~ notice of sald public
heart~g having bean duly given as requlred by lao~ and in accordance with the
provTsions of the Anahelm Munictpal Code, Lhapter 18.03, to hear and consider
Pc79->>5
evidence for and against sald proposed reclassiflcatton and to Investigate and make
findings and recortmendations in connection therevrith; and
WIiEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, invr.sttgation and study made
by itself and tn its behalP, and after due considera[Ion of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
i. That the pe[itioner proposes reciassification of subject property fran
che CG (Commerical, General)~ CL (Comercial, Limlted) and PD-L (Parking District-
CorrxnercTal) Zones to the CO (Commercfai, Offtce) Zone.
2. That the Anahein General Plan designates subJec[ property for gencral
cormierctal land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of sub;ect property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper devclopment of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassificatlon of subJect property dces properly
relate te the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subJect property and to the zoncs and their pcrmitted uses generaily established
throughout the cormunity.
$. That the proposed reclassification of su6jr_ct oronerty requTres [he
dedication and improvement of abutting streecs in accordance aith the Circula[ton
Element of the General Pian. due to the anticipated increase Tn traffic which will be
generated by thc intensificatton of land usc.
6, That one person Tndicated their presence at said publ(c hearTng in
oppositfon; and ttwt no correspondencc was reccived in oppositton co [hc subject
pe[iti~n.
ENVIRONNENTAI IHPACT FINDING; Environmental Impact Report: No. 18y was
previously anp~oved.
t1011, TNEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the A,iahcim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Pe[itton for Reclassificatlon and, by so doing. that Ti[le
18-Zoning of Che Anaheim Huniclpal Code be ~mended Lo exclude the abovr_-descrlbed
property from the LG (COHMERCIAL, GENERAL). CL (CQ'1MERCIAL. LIMITED) and PO-t
(PARY.ING DISTRICT-COhIMERCIAI) 7'OHES and to Incorporate said described property tnto
the CO (COMNERCIAL. OFFILE) ZONE upon the following conditions which are hereby found
to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property T~ order to
preserve the safety and generat welfarc of the Cttizens of the City of Anaheim:
i. That strect ligh[ing facllities along Helena Strer.t and Charcres Street
shal) be installed as required by ehe Director o` Public Utllities, and In accordance
with spectfications on file in the Office of the Director of Public Utillties;
and/or that a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credlt, or cash~ ln an amou~t
and form sattsfac[ory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to
guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned requirelne~ts.
2. That trash storage areas shall be prov)ded in accordance wlth approved
plans on file with the Office of the Direc[or of Public Norks.
-z- Pt79-tt5
3. That the~'~..ner(s) of sub'ect property shal~ submit a letter requesting
the terrinat(on of Uariance Nos. 113r 1~26. 2182 and 2531, and CondTtlonal Use Permit
Nos. 621 and 1925 to the Planning Commission.
4. That subJect property shall be deieloped substantlally in accordance
with plans and specificattons on file wtth the City of ~naheim marked Exhibtt Nos. 1
through 4; provided. however, that any modificatlon to the plans shall be submit[ed
to the Planning Commission for their approval prlor to issuance of a building permit.
5. That all roof-mounied equlpment shall be fully vicw-screcned and sound-
buffcrcd from adjacent properties.
6. That the uses Tndicated on Exhibit No. 1(corporate offices and general
offices) shall not be modified in such a way as to Tncrease che requtred parking
beyond thc number of spaces provided.
7. Prlor to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subJect pro~erty.
Condition Nos. 1 and 3, above-mentloned, shall be complcted. The provisions or
rights granted by thfs resolution shall become null and voTd by actlon of the
Planning Corriission unless said conditlons are complled with within one year from the
datc hereof, or such further tinc as thc Planntng Corrriission nay grant.
8. That Condition Nos. 2, 4 and 5, above-nentloned, shall be conplted with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTIIER RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Planning Commission does hereby
find and dete~~ine that adnp~i4n ef thi$ Rcsolutlon is exarr_ssly predlcated upon
applicant's compliancr. Nith each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any rart thereof, be declared tnvalid or unenforceable
by Lhe final Judgment of any courL of comoetent jurisdictlon~ then this Resolutlon,
and any approvals hercin contaTned, shall be decned null and vold.
7NE FOREGOItIG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by nc tfils 18th day of June,
1979. ~
t Rtt ,t, ANAHE i y 1 LA!~N I ~IG GONM V 55 ~ Ot~
ATTEST:
~ ~ !`V~+~-
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY LANNING COr'115510J1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
CO~JNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~, Edith L. Har~is. Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
here6y ccrtlfy that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted ac a meeiTng of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on June 18. 19?9~ by tlie followTng vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARIZES~ BUSHOfiE~ NER85T. JO'~NSON, KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMf115S10NER5: qONE
ABSENT: COM~415SIOYERS: DAVID
IN NITNESS Ut1ERE0F~ 1 have hcreunt'~ set my hand this 18th day of June. 1979.
~~ .~ ~.,..:.
SEi.;:ETAR~'~ ANANElt1 C4T~f PIANNIttG LOt4Yl5 tZ
-3- Pt79-115