PC 79-128r
t:
RESOLUTION N0. PC79'1Z8
A RESOLUT I ON OF THE At1AHE I M C ITY PLANf~ 1!fG COH.Y I 5510~I
THAT PETITIO!1 FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 78-7^-43 GRAtITED.
WFIEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Cortimission did recelve a vcrifted
petftion for Reclassifica[ion from ALFRED ~. PAINO A1~0 JOSEPHIt1E PAIf10, 711 South
8each Boulevard, A~aheim, California ?2Q~4, owners, and G. D. GA?DNER c ASSOCIATES,
2404-B Glasscll Strec[, Orange, California 92E65, agen[. of certain rea) property
situated in the City of Anahetm, County of Orange, Statc of California, described as
follows:
That portion of the Northeast quartcr of the Southcast quarter of
Section 14, in Township ~+ Souih, Range 11 West, in the Rancho los
Coyotes. shown as Parcel B on a Nap recorded in Book 12, page 3-~
of Parcel Maps, records of sald Orange County.
WHEREAS. the City Planning Commissian did schedulc a publlc hcaring at the
City Hall in the Clty of Anaheim on Nay 7. 1~79, at 1:30 p.n.. notice of said public
hearing having heen duly given as required by law and in accordance Hith the
provisions of the Anahefm Munlcipal Code. Ghapter 18.03. [o hear and consider
evldence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recomaendations ln connectfon therewith; said pubiic hearing having been
continued to the Planning tom Ission meeting of July 2, iq79; and
41HEREAS~ said Cormission after due inspection, invest(ga[ton and study made
by itseif and in its behalf. and after due consideratlon of ali evidence and reports
offcred at said heartng, does find anJ determine the following faccs:
1. That the petittoner proposes reclassification of subJect property from
the CL (Conrnercial. Limited) 2one to Lhe RS-7200 (Residenttal, Single-Famlly) Zone.
2. That the Anahcim General Plan designates subJect property for medturr,
density residentiai iand uses.
3. That ifie proposed reclasst`icatton of subJect property Is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper develo,~nenc of the community.
4. Tha[ the proposed reclasslftca[lon of subJect property does properly
relate to thc zones and their permTtted uses locally estabitshed in closc proximity
to subject property and to the zones and thelr permTttcd uses generally established
chroughout the communlty.
5. That the proposed reclasslfication of subJect property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance Hith the CTrculation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anttcipated Increase in traffTc Nhtch will be
generated by the fntensificatlon of land use.
6. That no one indicated thetr presence at sald public heartng Tn
opposition; and that no correspondence Has recelved In opposltlon to the SubJecL
petitTon,
Pt79-128
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Fzt101~IG: Tha[ the Anahci~ City Planning Cor*+ission has
rev(ewed ihe praposa to rec ass ty suhject property frm CL (Corrercial~ Limited) to
RS-7200 (P,esidential~ Singlc-FanTiy) zonln9 and to cstabllsh two residentlal lots
With Haivcrs of maxlmu~ ~a:i height and nlnimum lot arca on Portion A of subJect
propcrty consisting of approxima[cty O.i acre. having a frontaoc of approximatcly 140
fect on thc cast sidc of Hayward Street. having a nwximun depth of approxTmately 1C~
feet and being located approxtmatety 1190 feet souch of tfie centerlTne of Orange
Avenuc; and to permit a ba[t(ng cagc and recreational complcx with a walver of
maximum structura) height on Portion B of subject property censistin9 of approximately
1.0 acrc. having a fron[age of approximately 140 fee[ on the ~+es[ stde of Qeach
Boulcvard, havfn9 a naximu~ Jepth of approxinattly 3~2 fect, being loca[ed
approxirw[ely 1190 fcet souch of thc centerlinc of Orange Avenuc. and dces hereby
approvc tl~e ttegativc Dcclaration from the rcquirement to p~eparc an environmental
inpact report on [hc basis that there ~rould be no signifitant i~dividual or
cumula[ivc adverse environmental impact duc to the approval of thls Ncgative
Declaration sTnce the Anaheim General Plan designates the subjece property for nedium
density residentfal and 9encral cormercial land uses conncnsurate Hltfi thc proposal;
that no sensitive environmental impacts are invalved in che proposai: that the
Inttial Study submitted by the peticioner indicates no significant individual or
cunulativc advcrsc environmentai inPacts; ~~d that thc ~~eg~tlve Declaration
substantiatin9 ihe foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anahein Planning
Departnen[.
NON. 7HEREfORE. BE IT RESOLYED tfiat thc Anahclm Ci[y Planning Conmisston
does hcreby yrsnt zubject PecItian `ar .°.cclasstf~caclon ~nd. hy so dot~g. that Title
1C-Zoning of the Anah~in yunicipal Code be amended [o exclu~e [he above-descrTbed
property from the Cl (COMHEP.CIAL, LIy~TEO) Z01iE and to Incorporate said describcd
property into thc K~~72~0 (RESIDE4TIAL. SItJ~LC-fAJ11LY) 20~tE upon the folla+ing
conditions Ntiich are hereby found to be a necessary prerequtstte :o the DroDOS~d use
of subjcct propcrty in order to preserve the safety and gcneral wcifare of thc
Cit{zcns of the City of Anaheim:
t. That a11 cngincering requirerx~ts of thc Clty of Anahcin along Hayrrard
Strect including prepara[lon of inprovement plans and installation of all
improve,:~eats s;~e4 a. eurts and ~~~LL^rs~ stdc.eal4s, stror_t gradTng and paving.
drainage facilTties or ~ther appurtenant ~+ork, zhall be comPlTed .+ith as required by
the City Engineer and ln accordance with standard plans and specfficatlons on ftle in
the Officc of thc City Enginecr;or that a bond. certificate of deposit. letter of
credTt. or cash, in an ar,ount and form satTsfactory to the City oF Anaheim shall be
posted with the City to guarantee thc installation of the abovc-mentloned
requirements prior to occupancy.
2. 7hat [he arner(s) of subject property shati p~y Lo [hc City of Anahefm
a fec. tn an ar.wunt as dctermTned by the C1cY Council. for street 11ghtTng along
Hayward Strcct.
3. That the owner{s) of subJect property shall pay to the CTty of Anahelm
a fce. in ~n amount as determined by thc Lity Councii. for tree planting purposes
along Hayuard Strect.
4. That a parcel map. to record the approved divisTon of sub,)ect property
shall bc subnittcd to and approved Qy the C1ty of Anahcim and thcn bc recorded In the
offfce of the Orange County Rec~rder for the proposed residential lots.
-2- P!'79-128
~ • __
; " ~, f
~ .. _,,
5. That the owncr of subject property shall pay to the Ctty of Anahetm the
appro~riatP park and recreatton in-lieu fees as determined to be approprtate by the
Ctty Gouncil, said fees to be paid at the time the buiiding permit is issued.
b. That the aHner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3a96) in an amount as determined by the Lity Council,
for each new dweiling unit priar to the issuance of a building permit.
7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall abtain access rights along
Hayward Strcet.
9. Prior to [he intreductlo~ of an ordinance rezoning subJect property,
Condition Nos. 2. 3, 4, 7 and 8, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provTsions
or rights granted 6y this resolution shall become null and void by action of the
Planning Commission unless said conditions are cor~plied with within one year from the
date hereof, or such further time as the Planning Cocm;+ission may grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED chat the Anaheim City Planning Cortmtssion does hereby
find and de[ermine that adoption of this Resolution is e;cpressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance wlth each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the ffnal judgmen[ of any cour[ of competent Jurisdiction, then thfs Resolution,
and any approvals herefn contained, shali be deemed nu;l and void.
TFIE FOREGOING RESOLUTION Is signed and approved by ne this 2nd day of July,
1979•
~
NAN, t!A E 1 Y L tJN 1 HG COMM I SS I ON
ATTEST:
~~ ~ 7~;,
SECRETARY~ ANAHtIM CITY PLAt~~~ING COMMISSiON
SiATE 4F CP.~lF4P.MlA )
COU~~TY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANANEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify ihat the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
ctie Anahelm City Planning Commission held on July 2, T97~~ by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE~ DAVID, FRY~ HERBST~ KING~ TGLAR
NOES: COtiM1S510NERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NO~IE
It~ WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of July~ 197g,
~ d.cefi~~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CIT LANNING LONM SSION
-3- Pc79-i28