PC 79-13RESOLUTION N0, PC79-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAtiEIM CITY PLANNING COIIMISSION
THRT PETITION fOR CONOIT~ONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1?3~ BE DEMI'cD
WHEREAS~ the Anahetm Ci[y Planntng Gonmission dtd receive a verifled
Petition for Cond(tTonal Use Permit from EDWARD R. RESNICK AND CARL F. AGREN~ 6$02
Vta Carona Drive, Huntington Beach, Californta 92647, owners, and LEISURE TIHE
PRODUCTS~ 257~ Miraloma Way, Anahetm, California 92805. agent, of certafn real
property situated in the City af Anahein, County of Orange, State of Catifornia,
described as:
Parcel 1, tn the City of Anahetm, Councy of Orange, State of
Californta. as shown on a map filed in Book 99, Pages 42 and 4; of
Parcel Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County.
WHEREAS~ the City Planning Commisslon did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall (n [he Clty of Anaheim on January 15. 1^79, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by iaw and in accordance wi[h the
provisions of the Anaheim Munlcfpal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed ~ariance and t~ investtgate and make findings
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WNEREAS, satd Commission, after duc tnspectfon. investigation and study made
by itself and in tts behalf, and after d~e consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine thc following facts:
1. Thac the proposed use is properly one for ahich a conditional use prm(t
is authortzed by Anahelm Municiaal Code Sec[ions 1R.61.05n,S~n and 1R,61,n5~.0507 to
wit: to permit the outdoor storage of new vehicle chassis with walvers of:
(a) SECTtONS 18.06.060.033
and 1, 1.0 - Minimum number of arMinq s aces.
2 spaces requlred;
none proposed)
(b) SELTION 18.61.063.013 - Mtnimum lan6sca ed setback.
S eet requtred;
none proposGd)
(c) SECTION 18.61.068.0;0 - Re uired enctosure of outdoor uses.
b ock wa requ red;
none proposed)
2, That tht proposed use and requested waivers are hereby denled on the
basTs thac thc existtng Illegal outdoo~ storage of new vehicle chassis has created an
adverse tmpact on ;he nearby residential area.
PC79-t3
3• That [t~e proposed usc w111 adversely affect the adJoining land uses and
the growth and development of the area fn whlch 1[ is proposed to be located.
4. That the stze and shape of the s([c proposed for the use is not
adequa[e to allow Che full developmen[ of the proposcd use in a manner not
detrtmental to the particular arca nor to [hc peace, health, safe[y, and gencral
welfare of the Cittzens of the City of Anaheim,
5. That [he granting of [he Conditional Use Pcrml*_ will be de[rimenial to
the peace, health, safety and general aielfare of the Cit(zens of [he City ~f Anaheim.
6. That ~ persons indtcated their presence at said public hear(ng in
oppositton; and that no correspondence was received in opposttion to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONMEt~TAL 1'1PACT FINDING: That [he Anaheim City Planning Camission has
reviewed the proposal to perni[ the outdoor s[oraqe of new vehicle chassis wich
wafvers of number of requfred parktng spaces, required landscaped seiback and
required enclosure of outdoor uses on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land cortsisting
af approxfma[ely 1.G acres having a fron[aqe of approximately 1Q~ fce[ on the south
side of Miraloma uay, having a naximum depth of approximatefy 383 feet, being located
approximatcly 360 feet ~res[ of the centerline of Sunsfiine Way; and does hereby
approve the Negative Declarat(on from the requirenent [o orepare an envtronmental
impact report on [he basis that there knuld be no siqnificant indivtdual or
cumulative adverse environment~l impact due to [he approval of thts Negative
Declara[ton since the Anaheim Ge~er~l Plan dr.sfgnaces the subject property for
general industrial land us~s corrmensuratc with the oroposal; that no sensitive
envlronmen[al impacts are involved in thc proposal; that the Initial Study submitted
by the petitioner indicates no sipniftcant individual or cumulative adverse
env(ronmental inpacts; and that the Negative Declarat(on substantfating the foregoing
findings is on f(1e in the City of Anahcim Planning Department.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED thet the An~helm City PlannTn4 Commission
does hereby deny subject Pe[ition for Conditionai Use Perml[ on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
TNE FOREGOING RESOLU710N is signcd and approved by me this 15th day of
January, 1g79.
NAN~ A A EI. C T ANN Nr, COMHIS ION
ATTEST: ~
lOdE-.t.G6.. ,~ ~~
~SECRETAR , ANAHEIM C~TY LAIINING COMH15510N
-2- PC79-13
STATE OF CALIfORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edlth L. Narris, Secretary of the Anahelm City Planninq CommTssion, do
hereby certify that the foregotng resolutton was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on January 15, 1979, at 1:30 p.m.~ by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMNISSIONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE, DAVID, HERBST, JOHI~SON~ KING, TOLAR
NOE'S: COHMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN NITtlE55 NHEREOF~ I have hereunio set my hand [his i5th day of January,
1979.
~~_ ~C ~ it w ,t ~. _
SECRETARY, ANAHEIH CITY PLANNING CJMMISSION
-3- PC79-13