PC 79-153RESOLUTIO~J N0. PC79-153
A RESOLUTIO~~ OF THE A'lAHEIM LITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITfOtI fOR RELLl~SSIFICATION N0. 7?-80-7 8E GRAHTEO.
WHEREAS, the Anahetm City Planning Commission did recelve a verified
petttion for P,eclassification from A!JANEIM U1~ITED METHO~iST CHl!RCN, 1000 South State
College Boulevard, Anaheim, Lalifornla 92806, owner, and HALI AND fOREMAN~ INC., P.
0. Box 115G7~ Santa Ana, California °2711, agent of cer[aln reat property situa[ed
fn the Ctty of Ananetm, Lounty of Orange, State of Callfornla, described as:
The Easterly 185 feet of Parcel 1 tn the City of Anaheim, Couniy
of Orange, State of Californla as shown on a map filed in book 34,
page 5 of Parcel Haps in the office of [he Coun[y Recorder of said
Orange County.
NHERE~S, the City Planntng Commission did hold a public hearing at [he Ci[y
Hall in the City of Anaheim on July 3C~, 1979, a[ 1:30 p.m „ notice of said public
hearing havin9 been duly given as requtred by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anahefm Muntcipal Code. Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to inves[fgate and make
findtngs and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Lomm~ssion, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
oFfered a[ said hearing, does find and detcrnine thc following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject proper[y from
the RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural) Zone to the RM-3n0~ (Residential,
Muliiple-family) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim Gencral Pla~ designates subJect property for low-
density residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassificatlon ts hereby granted subject to [he
petitioner's stipulation at Che pubilc hearing to provide a G-foot high masonry block
wall along thc souih property llne adJacent to the single-Fanlly area.
4. That the proposed reclassiflcation of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for che orderly and proper development of the communlty.
5. That the prooosed reciassification of subJect properiy docs properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally establtshed in close proximity
to subJect property and to Che zones and [heir permltted uses generally establtshed
throughout the community.
6. That 3 persons indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was recelved in oppositton to the subJect
petition,
ENVIRONMENTAL IHPACT FINDING: That the Anahelm City Planning Commisslon has
reviewed t e proposa to rec ass y subJect property from the RS-A-43.000
(Residential/Agricultural} Zone to the RM-30D0 (Residential, Nultlple-family) Zone to
es[ablish a 1-lot, 21-untt condominium subdlvision on a rectangutarty-shaped parce)
PC79-~53
of land consisting of approximately 2.1 acres, having a frontagc of 185 feet on the
south stde of Wagner Avenue, having a maximum depth of appraximately 500 feet and
being located approximately 4y2 feet east of the centerline of State College
Boulevard; and does hcreby approve the Negative Declaration from the requlrement to
prepare an environmental impact report on thc basis Lhat there would be no
stgnlficant lndividual or cumulative adverse environmental imPact due to the approval
of this Negative Oeclaration since the Rnaheim Cenrral Plan deslgnates the subJect
property for lar-denslty residentlal land uses canmensurate with the proposal; that
no sensltive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial
Study submltted by the petitioner indicates no signtficant indivfdual or cumulative
adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the
foregoing findings is on fTle in the City of Anahclm Planning Departme~t.
tJOw, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED tha[ the Anahcim City Planntng Commission
does hereby grant subjec[ Petitlon for Reclasstfication and, hy so doing, that Title
18-2ontng of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
propcrty from thc RS-A-43,000 (RESI~ENTIAL/AGRICULTUP~L) ZONE and to incorporate said
described property into the RM-3000 (RESIOEtITIAL, NULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZCNE ~pon the
following condltions which are hereby found to be a necessary prereouisite to the
proposed usc of subject property in ordcr to preserve the safety an~ yeneral welfare
of the LTtizens of the Ci[y of Anahein:
9. That trash s[orage areas shall be provided in accordance Ntth.approved
plans on file with the Of`ice of the Director of Public Works.
2. That fire hydrants shall be inst~iled and ~harged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Deparement prtor to commencement
of structural framing.
3. That suhJec[ property shall be scrved by underground uLiiitics.
4. That dralnage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Enginecr.
5. In the event that subJect proper[y is to be divided for the purpose of
sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map, to record the approved divislon of subJect
property shall be submitted ta and approved by the Ctty of Anaheim and then be
recorded in the office of th~ Orange Coun[y Recorder.
6. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anahelm the
approprlate park and recreation i~-lieu fecs as determined [o be approprlate by the
Clty Council. said fees [o be paid at the timc the building permit is issued.
7. TLat all prlvate streets shall be developed in accordance with the Ctty
of Anaheim's Standa.-d Detail t~a. 122 for priva[e streets. Plans for the private
street lighting, as requlred by the sta~dard detatl~ shall be submitted to and
approved ty [he Electrlcal Division. Approved private street lighting plans shall
then 6e submltted to the Building DivisTon for i~ciuslon with the buildTng plans
prlor to tssuance of buiiding permits.
8, That an ordinance rezoni~g the sub)ect propercy shall in no event
becc~me effective exc~pt upon or following the recordatlon of F)nal Tract Hap No.
107~4 within tha time specifled in Government Code Section 664E3.5 or such further
time as the advtsory agency or City Council may grant.
-2- PC7~-153
i
9, That the owner(s) of subJect proper[y shall pay the traffic slg~al
assessment fee (Ordtnance No. 3396) 1~ an amount as determined by the Clty Council,
for each new d~oelling unit prior to the issuance of a building permlt.
90. That the owner(s) of subject property shall submtt to and have approved
by the Planning Lommission revised plans for Conditional Usc Permit No. 1193 to
reflect the modified land use proposed by thfs reclassificat~on.
11, That a 5-foot high masonry block wall shall be constructed along the
south property line.
12, That Condition Nos. 1, 3. 4~ 1Q and 11, abovc-men[toned, shall be
complied with priar to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTFiER RESOLVED that the Anahcim City Planning Cort~r~ission does hereby
find a~d determine that adoptlon of this Resotution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove se[ forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared inval3d or unenforceable
by the final Judgment of any court of comPetent Jurisdiction, then this Resolutlon,
and any approvals herein containcd, shall be dee~ed nutl and void.
TfiE FOP,EGOitlG RESOLUTIOt~ is signed and approved by mc this 36th day of July,
~ 979
c,C~, ~' ~~.~..~J
GHAIftHAN, A~~AHEIN C17Y PLANNING CQMkI5SI0N
ATTESi:
~~~ a° ~.~,
SECRETARY, A~~AtiE Iti C ITY PLAtJN I NG CONM I SS I Otl
STA'fE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORAtJGE ) ss.
LITY OF ANAHEIM )
~, cdtth L. Harris, Secretary of the AnaF~eim City Plannfng Commisslon, do
hereby certify that the `oregotng r~so)utlon was passed and adooted at a meeting of
the Anahelm City Plenning Cornmisslon held on July 3~, 197°, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: LOMM15510NERS: BARNES, BUSHORE, DAVID. HERBS7~ KING, TOLAR
~~OES: CQNMIS510!iERS: ~IOHE
AEtSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FRY
IN NITNESS NHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thls 30th day of July, 1979•
`~'~.~( .~° r~l.~~
SECRETARY ~A11EIH CITY PLANkING COMMISSION
-3- PC79-i53