PC 79-164,g...
y~.
RESOLUTION N0. PC79-154
A RESOLUTION OF THE AHAHEIM CITY PLANNING C0;IMISSfON
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2008 BE GRA~ITED
41HEREAS~ the Anaheim City Planning Comm(ssion dtd receive a vcrlfled
Petitio~ for Conditional Use Permit from KIRA~ICHA~~ORA TULSIBHAI BNAKTA A~~D TAP.A
BHAI;TA, 1836 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, ?2$05, owners of ccrtain
real property s'stuated in the Clty of Anaheim, County of Oranae,s[ate of Californla,
described as:
That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 26, Township 4 South, Range 10 Nest, S. B. 0. 6 H., In the
Rancho San Juan Cajon dc Santa Ana, dcscribed as follows:
Commencing at the interseciion of the center line of the 60 foot
Caiifornta State Highway with the Southwesterly extensicn of the
Southeasterly line of the land conveyed to the Southern California
Edison Company by deed recorded March 6, 1~12 in book ~07, page
51, of Deeds, said poi~t being South 40° 50' 15" Eas[ 301.Oh fee[
along satd center iine from the tJorth ilne of sald Section 26, and
running thence North 48° 58' East along satd Southwesterly
extension of said Southeas[erly line and along said Southeasterly
line 50 feet to the most Westerly corner of [he tract of land
conveyed to Southern CaitfornTa Edison Company by deed recorded
July 26 1922 in book 412. Page 363 of Deeds; [hence I~orth 89° 5!t'
East afong the South linc of che land conveyed to Southcrn
Lalifornia Edison Company by deed recorded July 26, iQ22 in book
412, page 353 of Deeds, a distance of T31.98 feet a point distant
150 feet measured at right angles from the center line of [he 6~
foot California Sta[e Highway; thence South 40° 50' 15" East
parallei with sald center line 79 feet to tha true polnt of
beginning of the boundary of the land heretn described; thence
continuing South 40° 50' 15" East aarallel wi[h said cencer llne
222.17 fect to the South line of the land conveyed to Leo A.
Pyeatt and wtfe by deed recorded January 23, 1917 1n book 235,
page 166 of Deeds; thence North 89° 57' ~+5" Nest along said South
line 198.38 feet to said center line of the 50-foot Callfornta
State Highway; thence Nerth 40° 50' 15" West along said center
line 92.31 feet to the Southwesterly corner of the land cor.veyed
to Louis Coldoff and others~ by deed recorded October 5, 1448 in
book 1710, page 241, Official Records; thence Northeasterly along
the Southeasterly llne of said land conveyed to Coldoff to the
true point of beginning,
WHEREAS, the City Planning CortmTssion did hold a public hearing at the CTty
Hall in the City of Anahelm on August 13. 1979, at 1:30 p.m., notice of sald public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provis(ons of the Anahelm Muntcipa) Code~ Chapter 18,03, to hear and consTder
evidence for and agalnst saTd proposed conditional use permtt and to Investtgate and
make findings and recortmendations ln connection therewith; and
PC7°-l~4
NHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspcction, investlgation and study made
by ttself and In its behalf, and after due consideratlon of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does flnd and determinc the followinq facts:
~, 7hat the proposed use is properly one for which a conditfonal use
pcrmit ts authortzed 6y Anaheim Municipa! Codc Ser.tion 18.61.~5~,27.n to wit: to
permit expansion of an existing motel tn Che ML (industrial, Limited) Zone to 23
units M~ith waivers of:
(a) SECTION 1t3.0~.050.0243 - Mirtmum number of parklnq spaces.
~3 soaces requ rc~
17 soaces proposed)
(b) SELTIOtI 13.61.063.012 - Hinimum landscaped setback.
(10 feet requfred;
none proposed,
2, Thac the requested waiver (a) is hereby granted on the basis that the
peticioner indTcated a certain percentage of the guests arrive by transportation
modes oiher than orivate automobt~c and, therefore. fewer parking spaces per mo[el
unit are nceded.
3, That the requr_sted waivcr (b) is hereby c~ranted on the basis that
denlai would deprive subJect property of privileges hcing enJoyed by other property
under ldenticai zontng classification in the vicinitv, said other prope~[ies having
no landscaped setbacks etther.
q, That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adJoining land uses
and the 9rowth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
5, Tha[ thc size and shape of thc sitc proooscd for the use is adequa[e [o
allow ifie full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of che Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
(, That the graniing of che Condttional Use Permit undcr the conditions
imposed. (f any, witl not be deCrimental to the peace, hcalth, safety and general
welfare of the Citlzens of the Ctty of Anaheim.
7, That the traffic gener~ted by the proposed use will ~ot Impose a~ undue
burden upon [he streeis and highways desl9ned and Improved [o carry the traffic tn
the area.
$, Thac no one tnd(cated thelr presence at satd public hearTng Tn
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to tfie subJect
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL 14PACT FINDI~IG: That the Anaheim City Planning Lommission has
revlewed the proposal to permit expanslon of an exTsting motel ln the NL (Industrtal.
Limited) Zonc to 23 un(ts with walvers of the minimum number of parking spaces a~d
mTnimu:n landscaped setback on a~ irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximatelY 0.4 acrc, having a frontage of approximately 1GG fect on the East sTde
of Anahelm Boulevard. having maxTmun depth of approximately 100 feet, and being
-2_ Pt79-164
locaied approximately 1035 fect north of the centerline of Paciftco Avenue; and does
hereby approve the Negatlve DeclaraClon fran the requlrement to prepare an
environmental impact report on the basis that the~e rrould be no sTgnificant
tndividual or cumula[ive adverse environmen[al impact due to the approval of this
Negative Declaration since the Anahelm General Plan designates the subject property
for general industrial land uses cocamensurate with the proposal; [hat no sensltlve
envircnmental tmpacts arc involved in the proposal; that the I~itlal Study submitted
bY the petitloner tndicates no significant individual or cumutative adverse
environmental Impacts; and that the Negative Declaratio~ subsean[iating the foregoing
findt~gs is on file in the tity of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE~ 4E IT RESOLVED that the lnahcim City Pianning CommTssion
does hereby grant subject Petitton for Conditional Use PermTt, upon the foltowing
conditions which are hereby found to be a ~ecessary prerequtsite to the proposed use
of the subJect property in order Lo preserve the safe[y and gencral welfare of the
Citlzens of the City of Anaheim:
1, That the owner(s) of subjec[ ~roperty shall pay the traffic sTgnat
assessmen[ fee (Ordinance t~o. 3896) i~ an amount as determined by the City Cauncil,
for the new motel units prior to the issua~ce of a Euilding permit.
Z, That trash storage areas shall be pravided in accordance wlth approved
plans on file wtth the Office of the Olrector of Public Norks.
3, That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with p~ans and specificattons on filc with thc City of Artaheim marked Exhibit Nos, i
and 2,
4. That Condttto~ Nos. 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be compiled wtth
prior to final bullding and zonTng inspections.
8E 1T FURTHER RESOLVED tha[ the Anaheim City Pl~nning Commisston does hereby
find and determine that the adoption of thTs Resolutien ts expressly predicated upon
aPPlicant`s compiiance with eac~ and aii of [he corditions herelrtabove set `arth.
Shoutd any condleion or any part thereof, be declared Tnvalid or unenforceabie by the
ftnal judgment of any court of competent Jurisdictlon~ then this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be deemed nutl and void,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOq is signed and approved by me this 13th day of
August. 1979.
~
CHA AN RO ORE
AMAHEIti CITY PLANNING COHHISSION
ATTEST:
~~ ,~ ~~.,..
SECRE A. ANA!{EIM CITY LANNIMG COMH15510N
-3- PC79-164
t
' ~i
STATE Of CALlFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I. Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission. do
hereby certlfy that the foregoing resolutton was passed and adopted at a meeting oP
the Anaheim City Planning CommissTon held on August 13, 1979, at 1:30 p,m.~by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAVID, FRY, HERBST, KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: t10NE
ABSENT: CONNISSIONERS: 9ARNE5, BUSHORE
IN WITNE55 WHEREOF, I have hereuntu set my ha~d thts 13th day of August, 1979-
~G~..
~ECRE ARY, NAHEIM I1~' LANNING COMM SS~ON
-4- Pt79-164