PC 79-191RESOLUTION N0. PC 79~1°1
p RE50LUT 10~i OF THE AFlAHE IM L ITY PLANN ING COMt115S 101~
T11AT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 3112 BE DENlED
11HEREAS, the Anahcim City Planntng Cammission dld receive a verifled
Petltlon for Varlance fram RAYMOND G. SPEHAR AND ESTELLE Y.. SPEHAR, ANU MIIRCIA Atl~i
HALLIGAN~ 913 Pa~O"~a Place, Fullerton, Callfornia 92635, owners, and GEORGE l.
BEAUREGAP,D, 1265 North Chrisden Street, Apartment A1D6, Anaheim, California 926807.
agent, of certaln real property situoted in the Ct[y of A~ahcim, County of Orange.
State of Californla described as:
That portion of the land allocted to Kalisher and uartenberg, as
described in the Flnal Decree of Partition of the Rancho Canon de
Santa Ana, a certified copy of whtch was recorded February $,
1$74, in Book 28, Page 158 of Deeds, records of Los An9eles,
California, des~ribed as follows: Parcel No. 2, as shown on a Hap
filed tn Book 75. Page 23, of Parcel Haps. in the office of the
County Recorder of Orange County, California.
NHEREAS, [hc City Planning Comm?sslon did schedulc a publtc hearTng at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on Sep[ember 10, 1!!79, at 1:3n p,m., notfce of said
Gu61ic hearing having baen duly given as reautred by law and in accordance wlth the
provtsions of the Anaheim Muntcipal Code, Chapter 19.~3, to hear and consider
evidence for and a9ainst said proposed variance and to investigate and make firdings
and recommendattons in connection Cherewith; said public hearing having been
contlnued to Lhe P~a~ning Commissian mcetin~ of September 2~±. 1979, and
WHEREAS, sald Commission. after due Inspectlon, investigation and study made
by Itself and in (ts behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offcred at said hearing, docs find an~i decermine [hc followi~g facts:
~, That the netitioner oroposes waivers of the following to construct
three (3) wall signs:
(a) SELTION 18.05.091.020 - Pernitted nunber size and location
o wa s~gns.
;onc ~l-s uare foot wall sign pe~mitted;
one 51-s uare oot and
two 130-square oot wall signs proposed)
(b) SECtIOt~ 18.05.091 - Permltted si ns In the ScenTc Corridor Zone Overla .
0 ree-standing signs permiited;
1 free-standing sign proposed)
Tdelcted)
2, That the above-mentloned waivers are hereby denled on the basls that
the petltToner did not ddnonstra[e that a hardship exists. and that slnce subJect
property Is located in the ScenTc Corrtdor 2one Overlay. an undesirable precedent
r+ould be establlshed )f the proposai were approvad.
Pt79-191
~ ~
3, That there are no exceptional ar cxtraordinary cfrcumstances or
conditlons applicable to the property tnvolved or to the intended use of the property
that do not app1Y 9eneralty to the property or class of use in the same vtcinity and
zone.
4. That the requested varlance is not necessary for the preservatlon and
enJoyment of a substantial property rtght possessed by other property in the same
vlcinity and zone, and denTed to the property (n qucstton.
5, That the requested variance Nill be materfaliy detrimental to the
pub)ic weifare or inJurious to the proptrty or improvements !n such viclnity and zone
In which ihe property is located.
6. That no one lndicated their presence at said public heartng in
oppositlon; and thaL no correspondence was received in opposi[Ton to the subJect
petitlon.
ENVIROHNENTAL IMPACT FI~ID1t1G: Thc Planning DTrector or his authorized
representat(ve has determined that [hc proposed projcct fails wTLhin [he definition
~~f Categor•ical Exemptlons. Class 3, as defTned in Paragraph 2 of che City of Anahetm
Envtronmental Impact Report Guldelines and Ts, therefore, categoricatly exempt from
thc requirement to prepare an EIR.
Hpu, THEREFORE, BE IT RES6LVED that the Anaheim City Fiannino Cor,+missio~
does hereby deny subject Petitlon for Variar.ce on the basis of the aforementioned
findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOp is signed and approved by me this 24th day o`
September. 1y79.
% ~~ir ~ii... l- Ci rt.s~.--~...~
CNAIRMAN. A~~ANEIM CITY PLAN'II~IG COMHISSION
Al'TEST:
SECRETA~ AI~~M~T PIANNitJG COMMISSION
STATE Of CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIH )
f~ EdTth L, Narris, Secretary of the Anahetm City PlannTng CommTsslon, do
hereby cerLify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anahelm City Planning Commisston held on September 24, 1979~ by the fotlowing
vote of the members thereof:
AYES: CONMISS~ONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE~ DAV~O. FRY. KING, TOLAR
NOES: COM.415510t~ER5: HERBST
ABSE4T; COMNISSIONERS: ~IOt1E
~979.
IN WITNESS HlfEREOF. 1 have hereunto set my hand thts 24th day of September~
~~ ~
~ ~TbN
-2- PC79-191