Loading...
PC 79-192RESOLUTION N0. PC79-192 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANN111G COHM~SSIO~J THAT PETI7tON FOR RECLASSIFICATIO~~ N0. 79-80-12 BE GRAtITED. WHEREAS~ the Anahelm City Planning CommissTon did recelve a vcrifled petltion for Reclassification from ST, MARK'S UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, 3700 41est Orange Avenue, Anahcim, California 92804, owner, and uALTER FORSYTHE, 518 South Brookhurst 5trcet. AnaheTm, Callfornia ?2804, agent. of certaln real property sltuated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange~ Statc of California, described as follows: The south 160 feet of Lhe eas[ one-hal` of the uest cne-half of the Northeast quarter of the Sou[heast Quarter of Section 15 township 4 South Range 11 IJesc tn the Rancho Los Loyotes. City of Anaheim~ County of Orange, State of California, as pcr map recorded (n book 51, page 11 of Miscelianeous Haps, in the office of the County recorder of said County, lyfng Northerly of the Nesterly prolongation of [hc cer.tcr line of Munaall Drive as sham on a map of Tract No. 35Q~, as per map recorded in boot: 133 pa9es 1L and 19 of Misceilaneous Maps, in the office of the County recorder of said County. Excepting the Nest 100 feet chereof. WHEREAS. the City Planning Cormission did hold a publtc hearinq at the City Hali in the City of Anahetm on Sept~nber 24, 197Q~ at 1:30 p.m „ notice of said public hearing having been duly given as reguired by law anJ in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evtdence for and against safd proposed reclassiftcation and [o in~~estigate and mal;e findings and recommendatians tn connec[lon therewith; and WHEREAS. sald Commission, after due (nspectton. investigation and study made by itself and tn its behalf, and after due cansideration of all evidence and reports offered at satd hearing, does find anJ determine the following facts: 1, That the petit(oner proposes reclassifictlon of subJcct property from the RS-A-q3,000 (Res(denttal/Agricultural) to RM-1200 (Residen;ial, MultTple-Fam(ly) Zone. 2, That the Anahetm General Plan designates subJect property for medium denstty residentTal land uses. 3. That the proposed reclassification of subJect property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the cortmunity. 4, That [he proposed reclassification of subJect property daes properiy relate to the zones and thelr permitted uses locally establlshed In close proxlmity to subJect proper[y and to the zones and their permltted uses gencrally establlshed throughout thc community. 5. That the proposed reclassificatlon of sub)ect property requires the tmprovcment of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the PC79-192 General Plan, due to che anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensiflcation of land usc. 6, That no one indicated thetr presence at said publlc hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subJect petition. ENYIRONMENTAL IriPACT FIN6ii:G: Tha[ the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposa to reclassify sub)ect property from RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural) to RM-1200 (Residential, Hultiple-Family) Zone with waivers of maxtmum building height and permitced vehlcular access to construct an 18- unit apartment complex on a rectangulariy-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately Q.7 acre, having a fronta~e of approximately 230 feet on the ~orth side of Mungall Dr(ve. having a maximum depth of approximately 128 fe~t and being located approximatcly 750 feet west of the centerline u.` Knott Strcet, and does hereby approve the Negative Der1-~;~tion from the requirement to preparc an environmental 'rmpact report on thP basis th~~ there would be no significant individual or rumulatfve adverse environmentai imp~~t duc to chc approval of this Negative Oeclaratlon sincP the Anaheim feneral Plan des~g~ates the suhJect property for medium der:stty resi~ential land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensftive envTro~~menral Impacts are invoived In the proposx~l; th;~t the Inttial Study subnTtted by the petitloner indicates no signiflcant individual or cumulative adverse environmental Impacts; and that the t~egative Dec~~ra~ion substantiatino the foregoing findings is on file ln the City of Anaheim Planning Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED ihat the Anaheim City Planring Commission does hereby grant subJect Pecition for Reclassiftcation and, hy so doinq, that Ticle 18-Zoning of the Anahe{m Municipal Code be amended te exclude the above-described property from the RS-A-43,~OQ (P,ESIDEt~TIAL/AGP,ICULTURAI) ZOtiE and to Incorporate said descrlbed property into the RM-S200 (RESIDENTIAL, MUITIPLE-PAMILY) ZOHE upon the following conditions whtch are hereby found to be a ~ecessary prereaulsite to the proposed use of subJect property in order to preserve the safety and gencral welfare of thc Ci[Izens of the City of Anaheim: t, Thst sLrcet !lghtEng fa~fttttes alon, Yungall ~rfve sha11 5c Installcd as required by the Office of Ucilities General Manager. and fn accordance with specifications on ftle in the Office of Utilities General Manager; and/or that a bond~ certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to 9uarantee the tnstailation of the above-menttoned requirements prior to occupancy. 2. That the owner(s) of subJect property shal) pay to the Clty of Anahelm a fee, in an amount as determtned by the City Councfl, for tree planting purposes along Hungall Drive. 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved ptans on file with the Office of the ExecutTve Director of Public Work.s. 4, That fire hydrants shall bc Installed and charged as requlred and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prtor to commencement of struGtural framing. 5. That subJect property shall be served by underground uttlities. -2- PC79-192 ~ ~ i 6. That drainage of subJect propcrty shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 7. That the owner of subJect property shall pay to the Ctty of Anahelm the appropriate park and recreation In-lieu fees as determincd to be apprapriate by the City Council, said fecs to be paid at the time the building permit is issued, 6, That the owner(s) of subJect property shall pay the traffic signal assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3896) in an amount as determined by the Lity Council, for each new dwelling unit prior to the tssuance of a buliding pernit. 9. That the owner(s) of sub)ect property shall submit to and have approved by the Planning Commtsston, revised plans for Special Use Pernlt No. 79 which reflect the modtfied land use praposat caused by this reclassiflcatlon. 10. Prior to the introductio~ of a~ ordinance rezoning subject property, Londition ~~os. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall bc completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by acCion of the Planning Commission unless said conditions are complied r~ith wiihin one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the PlannTng Commission may grant. il. That Condttiort Nos. 3. 5. 6 and 10, above-mentioned, shall be conplied with prior to finai butlding and zoning lnspecttons. BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED tha[ the Anaheim City Planning Canmission does hereby `ind and determine that adoption of this Resolutlon is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each a~d all of the conditions hereinabove se[ farth. Should any such condition, or any part [hereof~ be declared invaltd o~ unenforceable by the final ,judgment of any court of competen[ Jurisdiction, then thts Resolutton, and any apF~rovals hcrein contained, shall be deemed null and void. T11E FOREGOING RESOLUT~OtJ ts signed and approved by me this 21tth day of September, 1979. // /~ ~ l ~ 2~c2.-~L~-t.~ / - ~) 2-Lx....~_-~ CHAlittlAM, RNAHEIH CITY PLANt~iNG COHMiSSION ATTEST: ~ ~ - SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CI~Y LANN NG COMM ~~~ -3- PC79-t92 , (, i i,~;1 STATE OF CALiFORtJIA COU~ITY OF ORANGE ) ss. CiTY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Edith L. Harrts, Secretary of the Anahetm Lity Planning CommTssion~ do hereby certify that the foreaoing resolutTon r~as passed and adopted ab atheefollowinf the Anahclm City Planning Commtsslon held on September 24, 1979. Y 9 vote of the members thereof: AYES: COHMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BUSHORE, DAVID, FRY~ HERBST, KING~ TOLAR NOES: COMM15510NERS: NONE ABSENT: COMNISSIONERS: NONE IN WIT~~ESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of September, 1979. `~~__ ~ ~.~.. SECRETARY, ANANEIM CITY PLANNIHG COMMISSION -4- PC73-t92 _ ---_--~_y--- __"'I