Loading...
PC 79-200RESOLUTION N0. PC79-200 ~ RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COHMISSION THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 79-80-13 BE GRANTED. WNEREAS, the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commisston did recetve a verlfied petltion for Reclassification fran BIRCH RIDGE ESTATES, 4242 Campus Drive, P. 0. Box 1668~ Newport Beach, Lalifornia 92660, owner, and RICHARD L. OWEN, 4242 Lampus Dr(ve, P• 0. Box 1668, Newport Beach. California 92660, agent, oF certain real property situated !n the City af Artahetm, County of Orange, State of Lalifornta, described as follows: Lots i to 57. ~th incluslve. of Tract No. 9752. as show~ on a Map recorded ln book h18, pages 34 to 38. inclusive, of Miscellaneous Naps, records of Orange County. Lalifornla. I/HEREAS, the City Planning Commission d)d schedule a public hc~aring at the Clty Ha11 in the Ci[y of Anaheim on September 10, 1979, at 1:30 p.m., noilce of sald public hearTng havin9 bee~ duly given as requtred by law and in accordance Hith the provisions of the Anaheim MunicipaD Code, Chapter 18.03. to hear and consTder evidence for and against said proposed reclassifica[ton and [o investigate and make findings and recommendations in connectlon therewtth; said public hearing havtng been continued to the Planning Commission meeting of October 8. 1979; and WHEREAS, said Commission after due inspection, investigation and study made by Ttself and tn its behalf, and after due consldera[ion of all evTdence and reports offered at said hearing, dces fi~d and determine the following facts: 1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subJect property from the RS-HS-I0,QQ0(SL) (Residenttal, Single-Family Htllside - Scenic Corridor Overlay) Zo~~ to the RM-3000(SC) (Residential, Multiple-FamTly - Scenic Corridor Overlay) Zone. 2. ihat the Rnaheir Gerserat ?lan deslgnates subjec[ p~-aperty for iow and medlum density residential land uses. 3. That *_he proposed reclass(fication of subJect property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the camnunlty. 4. That the proposed reclassificatlon of subJect property does p~operly relate to ihe zones and [heir permltted uses locally established In close proxtmlty to subJect property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally establTshed throughout the community. 5. That no one fndicated their presence at said publtc heartng t~ opposTtion; and tht no correspondence was recetved in opposftioi to subJect petttlon. ENVIROlIMENTAL iMPACT FINDING: Thac [he Anaheim Clty Planning Commission having revlewed A dendum No. 1 to Environmental Impact Report No. 197 for TentatTve PC79-2Q0 Hap Tract ~los. 9752 ~Revtsion No. 1) and 10800 this date and evidence, both wrttten and oral, having been presented to supplement Addendum No. 1 to EIR No. 197, finds that potentlal environmental impacts of the proJeci may be reduced to an tnsigniftcant level by conformance with Ctty pians, policies and ordinances and Addendum Na. 1 to EIR No, 1~7 is in compllance with the Californ(a Environmental Quality Act and with City and State EIR Guidelines and, therefore, based upon such information, the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon certlfles Addendum No. 1 to EIR No. 197. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thai the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon does hereby grant subJect Petttion for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipat Code be amended to exclude the above-described property fran the AS-HS-10,000(SC) (RESlDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - SCENIC LORRIDOR OVERLAY) zONE to [he RM-3000(SC) (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY - SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY) ZONE upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subJect property in order to preserve [he safety and general welfare of the Litizens of the City of Anahetm: 1. That an ordlnance rezoning the subJect property shall In no even[ become effecttve except upon or following the recordation of Final Tract Map No. 10800 withtn the ttme specified in Government Code Sec[lon 66463.5 or such further time as the advisory agency or City Council may grant. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anahelm City Plannin9 Cortntssion does hereby flnd and determtne that the adoptton of this Resolution ts expressly predicated upon applicant's complTance wtth each and a11 of the condi[tons hereinabove set forth. Should any condltion or any part ihereof, be declared Invalid or unenforceable by [he final Judgment of any court of competent Jurisdictlon, then this Resolu[ion. and any approvals heretn contained, shall be deemed null and void, TNE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ts signed and approved by me this 8th day of October, 1979. ~~x~~~ / ~ CH IRMAN RO TEMPORE ANAHEIH CITY PLANNING COMHISSION ATTEST: ~~ ~ ~~~ SECRETARY~ RNAFi~IM CiTY PLANNING COMHISSION -2- PC79-2o0 ~ ; ;. ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHElM ) I~ Edtth L. Harrls, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commisston, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of tt~e Anaheim City Planntng Commtssion held on October 8~ 1979~ at 1:30 p.m„ by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAVID, FRY, HERSST, KING, TOLAR NOES: COMMISSIONERS: BUSNORE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES IN 411TNE55 41HEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand Chis 8th day of Octoher~ 1979• `~,~ ,~.° a ~ ~. SECRETARY~ NAHEIM CITY P~ANNING COHMISSION -3- PC19-2o0