Loading...
PC 79-207~ ~,>:: s; ,~ ~- ,1 . RESOLUTION N0. PC79-207 A RESOLUTION Of THE ANAHEIM CITY PLA~INING CONHISSION THAT P£TITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2Q27 BE GRAHTE~ WHEREAS~ the Anahcim City Planning Commlssion did receivc a verified Petitton for Condittonal Use Permlt from SMIP,ISH6ABU N. PATEL AttD PUSHPA N. PHTEL, and ARU11 H. PATEL AND PRA9HA A. PATEL, 2145 South Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, California~ 92802, owners, and THOMAS CASEH7A AND KENNFTH MC INTYP.E, 301 South Richm~nd Avenue, Fullerton, California 9z63z, agents, of certain real property sttuated fn thc City of Anahefn, Lounty Af Qr~nge, SCate of Californla, described as: PARCEL 1: The South 100 fee[ of [he Northeast quarter of the Nor[heast quart~r of the Southwest quartcr of Section 27, Tovmshlp 4 South, Range 10 West. In the R~ncho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana and Rancho Las Boisas, as shown on a Nap recorded in book 51, page 10 of hitscellaneous Maps, records o4 said Orange County. NHEREAS, the Lity Planning Cormmisston dTd hold a public hear(ng at the Ctty Hall Ir the Ciiy of An~heim on October 22, 197?, at 1:30 p.n., notice of satd public hearing havTng been duty given as required by laH ansi In accordance with the provtsions of Chc Anahcim Municipal Lode, Lhanter 18.03. to hear and consider evTdence for and agalnst said pro;~osed conditiona) use permit and co tnvesttgate and make finJings and recommendatlons in connection therewith; and h'HEREAS. said Cor,rnission, after due inspection, investiga[ion and study made by Itself and in I[s bchalf, and aftcr duc considcracion of ali evidence and reports offered at said hearl~g, does ftnd and de[ermine the follrn+ing facts: 1. That the proposed use is properly one for whtch a co~ditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipai Lode Sectton 18.44.050.IF0 [o Nit: to permit the expansion of an existing motel. 2. That the proposed use ts hereby granted subJect to the peiitioner's stipulattons ac the publtc hearing Lo prov)dc frncing arr~und Lhc s:~fr.r..tng ,~aai arca; to re~rove the arch in the front; and ;o clear the iQ-foot wide access area In the rear of the property in order to provide emergency vehicle access. 3. That thc proposed use wtll not adversely affer.t the adJoinfng land uses and the grnwth and development of the area In which it is proposed to be lacated. 4. That the size and shape of the stte proposed for the use Is adequate to aliow the full development of [he proposed use In a manner not detrimental to [he partl~ )ar area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Cltizens of thn ~ity of Anaheim. 5. That the granttng of the Condttlonal Use PermiL under the condittons imposed. if ~ny. will not be detrTmental to the peace, health. safety and generai welfare of the Cittzens of ihe City of Rnaheim. PC7g-207 ( ~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is stgned and approved by mc this 22nd day of October~ 1979. ~HA~~ H tl~ NAHE~IM CIT PL~ t1~~ ON aTresr: ~~ ~ ~ ECRE R~ MAHE H L NN ~ONN. _ N STATE 0~ CALiFOANiA ) CdUN7Y OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Edith L. Harris. Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannina CarmissTon, do hereby certlfy that the faregoing resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anahelm LTty Planning Canmisslon held an Octobcr 22, 5979. by the following vote of the members thereaf: AYES: COHMISSIONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE, DAVID~ FRY, HERBST, KING, TOLAR NOES: COMHISSIONERS: t~ONE ABS£NT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE iq7°. IH u1T~1E55 1JHEREOf, I have hereunto se[ my hand this 22nd day of October, ~ eLt.t~ .~ ~4.~,.,,~ SECRETARY, ANAMEIy CITY PLANNI!!5 CO!LMISSION -3- PC79-207 1 I 6. That the traffic oenerated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burdPn upon the streets and high~aays designed and improved to carry the trafftc tn the area. 7, That no one tndicated thelr presence at said public hearing ln opposltlon; an~ that no correspondence was recetved in opposition to the subject Fetitlo~. EI~VlRONME4TAL IMPACT FIt~D~NG: That the Anahelm City Pianning Commission has reviewed t e proposa to rec ass fy subJect property from the RS-A-b3,000 (Residential/Agrlcuitural) Zone to CL (Commerciai, Limtted) Zone to permit the expansion of an existino motel on a rectangulariy-shaped parcel of land consistiny of approxlmately 100 feet on the west side of Narbor Boulevard, having a maximum depth of approximately 270 feet and being located approximatcly 600 feet south of the centerline of Orangewood Avenue; and does here~y approve the Hegative Declaratlon from the requirement to prepare an envtronmental tmpact report on the basis [hat there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse envTronmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for commerciai-recreation land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensiCive envfronmental impacis are involved in the proposai; that the Initlal Study submttted by the peti[toner indlcates no significant indivtdual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts~ and that thr. Negative Declaratton substantiating the foregoing findings is on f(le in the City of Anahelm Planning Department. NON. THEREFORE, 3E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ciiy Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Londitlonal Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary pre~equisite to the proposed use of thc subJect property in order to preservc the safety and general welfare of the Citlzens of the Lity of Anaheim: 1. That this Conditional Use Permii is granted subJect to the completton of Reclassification No. 79-80-15, now pending. 2, That ihe proposed mo[el shall comply with all signing requirements of the CL Zone. 3. That subject property shall be devel~ped substantiatty in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anahein marked Exhibit Nos. t, 2 and 3: and/or provided; however, that kitchen efficiency units with a maximum of 5- cubic foot refrigerators; two-burner stoves~ excluding oven and baking facilities; and single compartment sinks may be installed; except that the manager's unit will be allowed to have full kitchen facllities. 4, That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above-mentioned. shall be complied with prior to ftnal building and zoning Inspections. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planntng Commission does hereby `ind and desermine that adoptlon of thls Resolution is expressly predlcated upon appiicant's compliance with each and atl of the condttlo~s hereinabove set forth. Should any such condttion, or eny part thereef, be declared invalid or unenforceable 6y the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolutton, and any approvals hereln contained, shall be de~ned null and void. -2- PC79-2o7