PC 79-228~
RESOLUTION k0. PC79'228
A RESOLUTIOtJ OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLAtIlIING CONl11iSI0N
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2039 BE DE~~IED
11F1EREA5~ the Anaheim City Ptanning Commtssion did reccive a verified
Petition for Condttional Use Permit from KENt~Y GOLF ENTERPRISES, Il~C., 1486 Enderby
Way, Sunnyvale, California 94087, owners of certain real property situated ln the
City of Anahetm, County of Orange~ State of CallfornTa, described as:
That portion of Lot 10 of Orange Grove Acres, in the Ctty of
Anaheim~ Loun[y of Orange. State of California, as shown on a map
recorded in Book 6. Paqe 42 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said
County. being also a portion of Parcel 1 as shown on a map filcd
tn Book 39, Page 42 of Parcei Maps, (n the offlce of said County
Recorder more particularly described as follows: Beglnntng at the
Southeasterly corner of sald Parcel 1; [hence along the
Southeasterly boundary of sald Parcel 1~ the followin9 courses:
South 73° 48~ 30" wcst 99.34 feet, South 77° 53' 3u" aest 117.38
feet, and North 3~ 46' 15" Nest 0.05 feet; thence con[inuing North
3° 46' 15" IJest 195.94 feet; thence North 85° 13' 45" East 178.44
feet to the Northeasterly line af said Parcel 1; [hence South 15°
11' 30" East 161.39 fcet along said Northeasterly llnc to the
POINT OF BEGI~INIt1G.
~IHEREAS~ the City Planni~g Commisston dTd hold a public hearing at the City
Hall Tn the City of Anaheim on Oecember 3. 1979, at 1:30 p.m.. nottce of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance wTth the
provisions of the A~aheim Municipal Code' Chapter 18.03. to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to tnvestigate and
make findings and recomnendations in connection thereHith; and
LIHEREAS, said Caimission, after due (nspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf. and after Eue cons(deration of all evldence and reports
offered at sald hearing, does find and determine thc following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for MhTch a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anahetm Municipal Code Sectlon 18.21.050.280 to wit: to
permit a watcrslide Tn [he RS-A-43~000 (Residenttal~ Aqrtcultural) Zone.
2. That [he proposed use is hereby denTed on the basis that sub)ect
proper[y Is in the Canyon Industrtal Area and is a portion of a parcel pa~tiaTly
zoned ML (industrial. Limtted) and developed as a mtniature golf course; that the
proposed expansion af the recreational use within the ir.dustrlal area will create
addittonat and undesirable trafffc and wl11 be a further encroachment into the
industrlal area; that the industrtal traffic already in the area would be a hazard to
thc safety of thc youth frequenti~g the proposed recreational establishment during
regular industrTa) business hours; and~ furthermore~ that subJect property abuts a
PC79-?.28
freeway and the proposed use would be an attractlve nutsance possibly creating a
tr~ffTc hazard to passing freeway trafftc.
3. 7hat the proposed use N111 advcrsely affect the adJoining land uses and
the growth and development of the ~rea in whtch lt Is eroposed to be located.
4, That the s(ze and shape of the site proposed for the use is not
adequate to alla~ thc fulT devclopment of the proposed use in a manner not
detrtnental to the particular area nor to the peace~ health, safety, and general
welfare of the Cltizens of the City of Anahetm.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit wlil be detrimental to
the peace, health~ safety and generai welfare of the CTtlzens of the City of Anaheim,
6. That the traffic gencrated by thc proposed use will imposc an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and Improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
7. That 2 persons indicated theTr presence at satd public hearing in
opposftion; and that no carrespondence -+as received tn oppositlon to the subject
pe[ition,
ENVIROtIME~lTAL IMPACT FltlDItIG: That the Anaheim C(ty Planning Comission has
rcviewed thc proposa to pern [ a Haterslide In thc RS-A-~i3.000 (Residen[iat~
Agrtcultural) Zo~e on an Trregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approxima[ely 1.0 acre located on the north side of the Riverside Freeway
approxtmately 2q1 feet souch of che terminus of Carpenter Avenue~ and does hereby
disapprove the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an envlrornnental
impact repor[ on the basis that there would be significant individual or cumulatTve
adverse environmental.
N041~ THEREFO4E~ BE IT RESOLVED thac the Anaheim City PlannTng Lommission
docs hereby deny subJec: PetltTon for ConditTonal Use PermTt on the basis of the
aforementioned findlr.gs.
THE POREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 3rd day of
December, 1?79,
ATTEST:
L~~,•.~l~= ~ ~..
~RhAN~ ApANE1H I LAt1N NG COMHISSIOq
~ CRE AR , N H M. AN~CONMI ION
-2- PC19-228
~ i
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIN )
I~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commtsslon, do
hereby certify Cha[ the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on December 3, 1y7g, by the followtng vote
ort the members thereof:
AYES: CO1fMISSIONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE, DAVID~ FRY, HERBST, Y.ING~ TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
kBSENT: CQMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN N~7NESS WHERF.~F, I havc hercunto set my hand thls 3rd day of December,
is~9.
~ ~ x° ~ ~
3ECRE~fA°Y,,~NANEIti CITY A`IlING COMMISSION
-3- PC79-228