PC 79-38RESOLUTION N0. PC79-3P
A~ESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLA~~NINr CO"1HISSION
TIiAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N~. 78-7^-27 BE GRA~~TED.
WHEREAS, thc Anaheim C(ty Planning Commisslon dld receive a verified
petition for Reclasstficatlon from JONATHAN T. Y. YEH, ET AL, ~~20 South Beach
Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92804, owners of certaln real property situated in the
City of Anahetm, County of Orange, SCate of California, described as:
The West 1/2 of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest auarter of
the Northwest quarter of Sectton 13. Townshlp 4 South, Range 11
West, S. B. B. 6 M.. EXCEPTINf THEREFROM the South 52E feet
thereof, also excepting therefrom thc Nest 92 feet thereof.
M'HEREAS, [he City Plannfng Commission did schedule a public heartng a[ the
City Nall In the Clty of Anaheim on January 29, 1979, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
pu6ltc hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Lode, Chapter 18.03, Co hear and consider
evidence for and ayainst said proposeE reclassification and [o investigate and make
findfngs and recommendatfons in connection therewith; said publie hearing having been
continued to Ciie Plannin9 Cortmisslon meeting of February 2f, 197?; and
NHEREAS, said Commission after due inspectton, investigation and study made
by itself and in Its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offere~ at said hearing, docs find and detcrmfne the following facts:
1. That the petttioner proposes reclassification of sub)ect property from
[he RS-A-~i3,G00 (Residential/Agrtcultural) Zone to the CL (Lonmercial, Limited) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan Jesignates subJect oroperty for general
corunercial land uses.
3. That the prnposed reciassification of subject property is ~ecessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and propcr development of the comnunity.
4. Tha[ the propased reclassif(cation of subJect property does properly
relate to th~ zones and thei~ pefmitted uses localiy established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and thetr permitted uses generally established
throughout the communtty.
5. That no one indicated thelr presence at sald public hearing In
oppositton; and [hat no correspondence was recetved in oppositlon to the subjec[
petltion.
EN4IRONNENTAL IHPAC7 FINDING: That the Anaheim Lity Plannin9 Commission has
reviewed the proposal to reclass fy subJect property from the RS-A-43~000
(Residential/Agricultural) to the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone to expand an exlsting
motel wlth waivers of maximum structural height on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of
PC79-38
land consistin9 of approximately 0.6 acre, having a frontage of approxlmately 13B
feet on the east side of Beach Boulevard, having a maximum depth of approxlmately 238
feet, being located approxinately 528 feet north of the centerllne of Orange Avenue;
and does hereby approve the Nega[fve Declaratlon from the requtrement to prepare an
environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no significant
(ndividual or cumulattve adverse environmental Impact due to the approval of this
Negative Declara[ton since the Anahelm General Plan designates [he subJect property
for general coamercta) land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive
environmental impacts are tnvolved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submltted
by the pet(tioner indicates no siqniftcani individual or cumulative adverse
environmen[al impacts; and that the Nega[ive Declaration substantiating the foregoing
findings Is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVE6 that the Anaheim Clty Planning Commisston
does hereby grant subject Peti[ton for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
13-Zoning of the Anahetm Municipai Code be amended io exclude the above-descrtbed
property from the RS-A-43,0~0 (RESIDEtlTIAL/AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporate sald
described property tnto [he LL (COMMERCIAL, LIMITED) 20t1E upon the followfng
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequislte to the proposed use
of subJect property in order to preserve thc safety and general weifare of [he
Citizens of [he Ltty of Anaheim:
1. That trash storage areas shall be previded in accordance Hith approved
plans on file with the Office of the Director of Pubiic Works.
Z. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the trafftc signal
assessment fee (Ordinance Wo. 389G) amounting [o $3f„ Or, per each motel unlt prior to
the issuance of a buildtng permit.
3. That Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be comolied with prior to
final building and zon?ng inspecttons.
BE IT FURTNEP. RES~~YED that che Anaheim City Plannlnq Commission does hereby
finu anJ Jetermine Cfiat aJoption of this Resolu[ion is expressly preuica[ed upon
applicant's compltance wftfi each and all of the condicions herelnabove set forth.
Should any such conditlon, or any par[ thereof, be declared invatid or unenforceable
by the flnal judgment of any court of competent )urisdiction, then thi; Resoiution~
and any approvals herein contained~ shall be deem~d null and void.
THE FOREGOING RFSOLUTIOt~ ts signed and approved by me [his 26th day of
February, 1979.
CNA MAq, A E ITY PL NNING ~OMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~. ,~.° ~1.a,,,~.:,
SELRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMiS510t~
-2- Pt79-38
STATE OF CALIFORFlIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
GITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edlth L. Harrls. Secretary of the Anaheim Ctty Planning Carcnisslon, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resotutlon was passed and ~dopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission hcld on February 26, 1979, at 1:3~ p.m.~ by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COt1M15510-7ER5: BAfiNES, BUSHORE, DAVID, HERBST, JOHtlSON, KING
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CO'1MISSIONERS: TOLAR
1975•
IN NITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my har,d this 2Eth day of February.
`~~.~. ~ ~.~,,,,,~..
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLA'INING COMHISSION
_3_ PC79-38