PC 79-5RESOLUTION N0. PC7Q-5
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANP,FIEI!1 CITY PLANNIIlG COhHIS510N
THAT PETITIO~t FOR LONOITIONAL USE PERr1T N0. 19~1 BE DENIED
WtiEREAS. the Anahcim City Planning Cmmission did receTve a verifieC
Petitlon for Condt[ional Use Permit from LA11RE1~CE U, ALLEN~ 2028 South Flippen Drive.
Anaheim~ Lalifornla~ 92302. ovmcr, and PURU PATfI~ 202'i South Ha~bor Boulevard,
Anaheim, California 928Q5. agent, of certatn reai property situated Tn Che tity of
Anaheim~ County of Orange, State of Californla, descr(bed as:
iNE SOUTH 272.00 FEET OF THE EAST 5g5.00 FEET Of THE NQRTH FihlF OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHVEST QUARTER CF SECTION 27.
TOtiRISHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 l~fEST, PARTLY iH TFIE RANCHO SAN JUAH
CAJON DE SANTA At1A~ AND PARTLY IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS. ALL IN
TNE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS PE°
l1AP RECORDED IN BOOK 51 PAGE 10 Of MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE
OFfICE OF TNE tOUHTY RECOROER OF SAID COUNTY,
VFiEREAS, the tity Planning tor~misslon "d fiolA a public hearing at the CTty
Ha11 in the City of Anahein on J~nuary 3~ 197~. at 1:3~ o.n.. notice of satd publie
hearing havtng been duly given as revuired ny law and Tn ++ccordance w(th the
provisions of the Anaheim Munictpal Code, Lhapter 1'..~3. to hear anA consTder
evldence for and agofnst said proposed variance and to investigate and ~+ake fTndTngs
and recomnendations in connectlon thererrith; and
WNEREAS, sald Cammission. after due inspectTon~ investigotion and study made
by icself and in it~. Aehaif, and after due consideration ef a1t evidence and reports
oft°ered at said hearing. does find anA dete m Tne the follorvinq facts:
1. That the proposed use is Droperly o~e for .rhich a condttlonal use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Mu~icinal Code 5ectlon ib.ti%i,05D.154 to v.it: to
Permit a rec:eational-vehicle park in conJunctTo~ with an exisLTng nwtel.
2. That the proposed use is her'by denied on the Dasis that Tt aould not
be comPatible with surroundtrtg uses and Is not the htohest and Dest use of the
property.
3. That tfie proposed use will adversely affect the adJoining lsnd uses and
the grarth nnd development of the ares Tn wfiich tt Is proposed to be ~oc'ted.
4. That the slze and shape of the site proposed fo~ tQe use ts no[
adequate to allar thc fuii development of the proposed use In a awnner not
detrimental to che parttcutar area nor to the peace. health~ safety, and general
welfare of the Cittzens of the City of Anaheim,
S. That the ~ranting of the Conditlonai Use Prr.nit will De Jetrin~ent~i to
the peace. health~ safety and generai r+rlfare of the Citizens of the City of AnaAeim,
PC74-5
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing tn
oPPosition; and that no correspondence was received In opposition to the subJect
pett[lon.
ENVIRONMENTAL iMPACT fIN01NG: tha[ an Environmental I~pact Report Negative
Declarstion Nas prev ous y approve at the meeting of October 23, 197g. ~aheim CTty
Ptan~ing Camm(sston No. PC78-249.
NOW~ THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
dxs hereby deny su5ject Petition for Condlttona) Use Permit on the basis of the
sforement(oned findings.
TME fOREG0IHG RESOLUTIOH is signed and approved by me this 3rd day of
January, 1979•
C ~`~Gw /~~ ~ 2. ~
t+n t anaH R~MPORE ,
ANAHEI''1 CITY PLAHNINC COMy15SI0N
ATTEST:
rP GC~: a~ ~
5 RETARV. NAN i`1 1 IANN N, 0!1'11 ~ 1 tl
STkTE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAMEIM ~
1, ECILh l. Marris. Secretary of the Anahein~ Clty Planning Commlssion. do
he~cby certify thst the fo~egpTng resoiutlon aas passed and adopted at a meetTng of
L4c ttr.sf.cir LI:Y °l~~nlrrf ~~l~slan hwl~± ?r. ~!!T!!)PTY ?~ 2R;±~~ a~ ~~3~ fi.~^.~ ~y tlre
following vote of the n~bers the~eof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BA4HE5. BUSHORE. DAYIO~ JOMHSON~ KING, TOLAR
NQES: COM.yfSStONERS: HONE
ABSENT: COt~'1155tONERS: MERDST
1979.
IN YITNESS MNEREOF. I have hereunto set nry haed this 3rd day of January.
3 . ~ •~ ' Y1 N
-2. PC79-S