PC 79-60RESOLUTION N0. PC79-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLAN~itNr, CO~IMISSIO~~
THAT PETITION FOR COtIDITIONAL USE PEP.MIT N0, 1a34 BE GRANTED
Nf1EREA5, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did recetve a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from ROMAN LATHOLIC BISHOP OF ORA~~GE, 4A0 South
Batavia Street, Orange, Californla 9266a, owner, and JOH4 BC,RTLETT ACLOCIATES, 37
West Nuntington Orive, Arcadia. Caltfornta ~1006, agent, o` certaln real property
situated (n the City of Anahefm, County of Orange, State of California, descri6ed as:
THAT PqRTION OF THE LAHO ALLOTTED TO EDUARDO POLLORENO IN DELREE
OF PARTITION OF THE RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, RECORDED IN BOOK
"B" OF JUDG4ENT5 OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL DtSTRICT COURT OF
CALIFORNIA. IN THE CITY Of AHANEIM, COIIYTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORt~IA, AND THAT PORTION OF LOT 2 OF TKE DONINGUE7 ESTATE, AS
PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 2 PAGE 15 OF RECORD OF SUP.VEYS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER Of SAID GOUNTY, BEGItvNING AT THE
LONMON CORNER OF SECTIONS 1, 2 11 AHD 12 T041NSHIP 4 SOUTk, RANGE 9
NEST; THENLE EAST 231.32 FEET; TFIENLE NOP,TH 1973.h5 FEET TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SANTA ANA LA!lYON ROAD AS DESCP.IBEp Itl DEED TO
THE STATE OF CALIFOR~IIA, fiELOP.DED JULY 2. 1~48, iM BOOK 1653 PAGE
304 OF OFFICIkL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THEIICE SOUTH 71+° 17' j0"
41E5T 292.Z3 FEET ALO'!G SAIJ SQUTNCPLY LIN: TO TIlE CO"'t0`7 SELTIO~~
LINE BE7NEEN SAID SECTIO-i5 1 A~~a 2; TF1E11CE SOUTH 74° 17~ 3n~~ wEST
40?.52 FEET ALONG TNE SOUTHERLY LI!!E OF SAID ShtITA aNA C4!7YOH
aOAD; TriENLE SOUTH 17g3.~3 FEET; THEUCE EAST 3~3.2E FEET TO THE
POIr~T OF BEGINNR~r,,
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Car~ission did hold a public heartng at [he Ctty
Hall i~ the Lity of Anahefm on March 26, iQ79, at 1:30 p.n „ notice of sald public
hearing having been duly gtven as required by ;aw and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anahein Municipal Code, Lhapter 13.03, to hear and consider
evldenca for and againsL saf:' pr^aosra condILionat u;e art~' Lo investigate and rake
findings and recommendations in connection cherewi[h; and
1lHEREAS. said Corrmission, after due inspection, investtgation and study made
by itself and tn its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and deternine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use ts proaerly one for which a conditional use
permft is authorized by Anaheim MunicipalLode Section 18.21.~50.110 and 18,21.050.270
to wit: to permit a church wtth accessory school facilities with a waiver of:
SECTI0~1 18.84.042.011 - Naximum structural hel ht.
25 eet permit[ed;
~and 28 feet proposed)
2, That the proposed use is hercby g~anted subJec[ to the petttToner's
stipulation to provide landscaping wtih appropriate trees alon9 the storm drain
easement on the west proper[y li~e to buffer abutiing stngle-famlly residences.
PC7q-60
RESOLlIT10N N0. PC79-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM LITY PLAN~~ING COyMI5510N
THAT PETITION FOR CGNDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 1?3° BE GRANTED
IJFiEREAS, the Rnaheim City Planning Commission did recelve a verifled
Petitlon far Conditional Use Permit from ROMAN CATFIOLIC B~SHOP OF ORAt~GE, 440 South
Ba[avta Street. Orange, Caltfornla 92660, ~wner, and JOHN BARTLETT ACCOCIATES~ 37
West Huntington Drtve, Arcadia, Californla ~1006, agent, of certain real property
sftuated In the Cfty of Anaheim~ County of Orange, Stace of California~ described as:
THAT PORTION Of THE LA~10 ALLOTTED TO EDUARDO POLLORENO IN DECREE
OF PARTITION OF TNE RANLHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA. RELORDED iN BOOK
"B" OF JUDG!IEt~TS OF TNE 17Thi JUDICIAL OISTRICT COURT Of
LALIFORNIA, IN THE CITY OF A~lAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORAkGE. STATE OF
CAIIFORNIA, AND TfIAT PORTION OF LOT 2 OF TNE DONIN;UEZ ESTA7E, AS
PER MAP fILED I~~ BOOK 2 PAGE 15 Of RECOP.D OF SUP.VEYS~ IN THE
OffICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID CQUNTY. BEGINHING AT THE
CONMOt~ CORt~ER OF SECTIONS 1. 7. 11 At:D 12 TOWNSNIP b SOUTH, RA~tGE 9
N[ST; THENCE EAST 231.32 FEET; THENLE NOP,TH 1978.Fi5 FEET TO THE
SOUTFiEFiLY L I NE OF SANTA ANA LAtlYON ROAD AS DESCR I BED I N DEED TO
THE STATE OF CALIFOR111A, RECOP.DEQ JULY 2. io48, IN BOOK 16E3 PAGE
304 OF OFfICIAL RELORDS OF SAtD COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 74° 17~ 3p"
kEST 292.23 FCET ALOi~G SAfD SOUTItCRIY LIKE TO TIiE COHHON SECTION
LINE BETWEEN SAID SECTIONS 1 A1~~ 2; THENC[ SOUTN 74° i7' 3~" WEST
40?,52 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SA~lTA ANA L4NYOM
ROAO; TNENCE SOUTH 1739.93 FFET; 7HErlCE EAST 393.2E FEET TO THE
PO I t~T OF BEC, I NN I!!G.
WHEREAS. tlie City Planning Cor,misslon did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall fn the Ci[y of I\naheim on March 26, 1Q74, at 1:30 p.m,~ notlce of sald public
hearing having been d~ly gtven as required by law and in accordance wtth the
provisions of the Anah~eim Municipal Code, Chapter 13.03, to hear and consider
evtdence for and agatnst sald propcsed condJtiona~ use and ta irtvestigate and make
findfngs and recommendations tn connectlon therewlth; and
WHEREAS~ said Commission, after due inspection, invesci9ation and study made
by itself an~ in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine [he followin,q facts:
i. That the proposed use Is properly one for which a conditional use
permft is authorized by Anaheim MunicipalCode Sectlon 18.21.~50.110 and 18.21.050.270
to wit: to permit a church with accessory school faciltties with a waiver of:
SECTION 18,84.042.011 - Maxtmum structural het ht.
25 eet permitted;
~and 29 feet proposed)
2, That the proposed use is hercby granted subject to the petitioner's
stipulatlon to provide landscaping wfth appropriate trees along the storm draTn
easement on the west property ltne to buffer abutting single-family residences.
PC79-60
3, That the requested waiver is herebY9ranted on the basts that simtlar
requests have been granted in the area and denial would be deprtvtng subJect property
of a privilege betng enJoyed by others in Che same zone and victntty and on the basis
that the highest proposed structure, a 48-foot high tower, is only 3z feet above the
grade of the adJacent residential lots; and that satd tower is purely ornamental in
nature.
li, Tha[ [he proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be lotated.
5. That the size and shapc of [he site proposed for the use is adequate Lo
aliow thc full development of the proposed usc in a manner noC detrimental [o the
particular area nor to the peace, heaith, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the Lity of Anahetm.
6. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the condltions
imposed. if any, will not be de[rimental [o the p~ace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahefm.
7. Tha[ no one indtcated their presence a[ said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposttion to the subJect
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL 114PACT FINDING: Tha[ the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to permi[ a church wi[h accessory school Pactltties wtth walver
of maximum structural height on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land conslsting of
approximately 5 acres located at the southwest corner of Santa Ana Lanyon Road and
Solomon Orive, having approximate frontages of 3~B feet on the south side of Sa~[a
Ana Canyon Road, ~015 feet on Che Nest side of Solomon Drive, and 11° feet on the
north side of Cicero Road; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the
requirement to preparc an environmental impac[ report on the bas(s that there would
be no signiftcant individual or cumulative adverse envtronmenta) impact due to the
approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anahelm General Plan designates the
subject property for low density residenttal land uses commensurate with the
proposal; tha[ no sensitive environmenCal impacts are }nvolved 1rt ttie propo;al; that
the Initfal StuJy submftted by the petitioner indicates no significan[ individual or
cumulative adverse envirornnental Impacts; and tha[ the Negattve Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findings is on fite in the City of Anaheim Planning
Department.
NOW, THEREFQRE. BE IT aE50LVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon
does hereby gran[ subJect Petition for Londitional Use Permft, upon the following
condittons which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to [he proposed use
of the s~bject property in order to preserve the safety and generai wclfare of Che
Citizens of thc Clty of Anahetm:
1, That sidewalks shall be installed along Solomon Drive as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifica[tons on ftle In
the Offtcc of the Clcy Engineer,
2. That street lighting facitities along Solomon Drive shall be installed
prfor to [he final building and zoning inspections unless otherwise approved by thc
Director of Publlc U[ilitles, ~nd in accordance with specif(catlons on file ln the
-2- PC7S-6o
~`
5
Office of the Director of Public Utilities; and/or [hat a bond, certiftcate of
deposit, letter of credit, or cash, 1~ an amount and form satisfactory to the City of
Anaheim shall be posted with the City to 9uarantee the installacfon of the above-
mentioned requirements.
3. That the owner(s) of subJect property sFiall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fec, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for tree planting purposes
along Solanon Drtve.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provfded in accordance with approved
plans on file wtth the Office of the Dlrector of Public Works.
5. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chlef of the Fire Department prior to commencement
of structural framing.
6. That subJect propercy shail be scrved by underground u[ilitles.
7. Tha[ drainage of subJec*_ property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
Ci. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigatton faciiities shall be
installed fn [he medtan and the unpaved portion of the south side of Santa Ana Lanyon
Road rtgh[-of-way In accordance with the requirements of the Superln[endent of
Parkvray Maintenance. Foliowin~ lnstallation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim
sliall assume the responsfbllity for main[enance of said landscaping in the median
only with the owners of subject property maintaining the parkNay on the south side of
Santa Ana Canyon Road.
9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay [he [rafffc signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 33~6) in an amount as determined by [he City Council.
for commercial buildings prior to [he issuance of a building permit.
10. That subJect property shall be developed substantially in accordance
+~lth ~lans and specfffcations o~ file aith the City of Anaheim marked Exh?blt Nos. 1
througfi 5; provided, however, that [he 15-foot wlde storm drafn easement along the
west property line sh~il be planted with trees, tfie numbers and spacfng of whtch
shall be approved by the Planning pepartment•
11. That the proposed church shall comply w(th all signing requirements of
the RS-A-43,000(SC) zontng, with the exception of those signs speciftcally Ind(cated
on plans and specifica[lons on file with the Lity of An~helm marked Exhibit Nos. 1
[hrough 5.
12. That any spectmen [ree removal shall be subject to the regulations
pertaTnTna to tree preservatlon in the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone.
13. That tt:e ow~er(s) of subject property shal) dedicate and improve a 10
foo[ wide equestrlan and hiking trail as shown on the Equestrtan and Hlking Tratis
Component and that improvement plans. in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on flle in the Offlce of the Clty Engineer, shatl be submi[ted in
conJunctlon wi[h the grading plan; and/or that a bond in an amount and form
-3- PC79-b0
satisfactory to che City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the
tnstallation of the above-mentioned requirements prtor to occupancy.
14. ihat Condi[lon Nos. 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be complied wlth
prior to the co•mencement of the activi[y authorized under this resolutlon~ or prior
to the ttme tt,at the bullding permit Is Issued, or wichtn a pertod of one year from
date hereof~ whtchever occurs first, or such furcher time as r.he Planning Commisslon
may grant.
15. That Condition Nos. 1, 4. 5~ 7, 8 and 10, above-mentloned, shall be
complled with prior to finai buTldin9 and zonirtg inspections on the first
construction phase.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that ihc Anaheim City Ptanning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolutton is expressiy predtcated upon
appllcant's compliance with each and all of the conditions heretnabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof~ be d~clared invaiid or u~enforceable
by the final Judgment of any court of competent jurisdictton, then this Resolutto~.
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE F~REGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 26th day oF
March, 1979.
N, H C LANNING C6MMISSION
ATTEST:
`~ a.~.t~. .~ ~~,~.4.
SECRETARY, AtIAHEiM LITY LANNING COriM15510~!
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIN )
I, Edi[h L. Harrls, Secretary of the Anaheim Ci[y Plannin9 Comnission. do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolu[ion was passed and adopted at a meeting of
[he Anaheim City Flannf~g Commission held on Harch 26~ 1979, by the following vote of
the mcmbers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIO~IERS: BARNES. BUSHORE, DAViD, HER85T, JONtI50N. KING, TOLAR
NOES: CONMISSIOHERS: NONE
ABSENT: COHMIS5104ER5: NONE
IN 411TNES5 WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand thts 26th day of March~
1979.
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMNISSION
-4- PC7Q-F~