PC 79-61RESOLUTION N0. PC79-61
A RESOLUTION OF TNE AtIAIIEIM CITY PLANNING CO`1HISSION
THAT P[TITI01~ FOR CO~JDITIOt~AL USE PERMIT N0. 1955 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, [he Anaheim L1ty Planning Commission did recelve a verified
Petitlon for Condt[ional Use Permit from BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES, INC., 260 Newport
Center Drive /1520, Newport Beach, Lalifornia, 92E60, owner, and NATIO~IAL CONVENIENCE
STORES. INC., 1385 Knollwood Circle .96, Anaheim, California ~2801, agent~ of certain
real property situated in the Clty of Anaheim, County of Orange, Statc of Californla,
described as:
PARCEL 5, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
LALIFORNIA, AS SHONN ON l1 RARCEL NAP FILED IN Ei00K 99 PAGE ;2 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN TfiE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a oubifc hearln9 at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on March 26, 1979, at 1:3f1 p,m „ notice of sald publTc
hearing having been duly given as requtred by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and a9ainst said proposed conditional use and to (nvestigate and make
findings and recommenda[lons in connectlon therewith; and
1JHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspectton, investigatton and study made
by itself and in its behalf~ and after due consideration of all evldence and reports
offered at said hear(ng, does find and determine the following fac[s:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for whtch a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Lode Section 1A.03.030.010 to wit: to
permit the retail sale of records and tapes in the ML (Industrial, Limited) Zone.
2. That [he proposed use is hereby denled on the basis Chat it is not
compa[ibin wi[ii the surrounding industriai area. that approval coufd cause adverse
traffic problems in the area whlch is at Yhe terminus of a cul-de-sac, and that
approval could set an undesirable precedent for establ)shtng commerclal uses in the
industrial zone and (ndustrial buildings.
3. That the proposed use wtll adversely affect Lhe adjolning land uses and
the growth and development of the area tn which It ts proposed ta be located.
4. That the stze and shape of the site proposed for the use is not
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use tn a manner not
detrimental [o the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety. and general
welfare of the Citizens of the Ctty of Anaheim.
S. That [he gra~ting of the Conditlonal Use Permtt will be de[rimental to
the peace, health~ safety and general welfare of the Cttizens of the City of AnahGim.
6. That no one lndicated thetr presence at said publlc hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence Nas recetved in opposition to the subJect
petition.
PC7Q-61
~;,
EHVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FIHDtNG: That the Anaheim Clty Plannin9 Carmission has
reviewed the proposal to permit Che retall sales of rccords and tapr.s in the ML
(Industrfal~ Llmited) zone on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisttn~ of
approximately 3 acres, having a frontage of approxinately P7 feet on the nor[herly
cul-de-sac term(nus of Knollwood Circle, having i maxTmum depth of approximately 513
feet, being located approximately 2h08 feet north of the centerltne of Woodland
Drive; and does hereby approve the Negative Deciaration from thc requtrement to
prepare an environmental tmpact report on the 6asis that there would be no
significant individual or cunulative adver~e environmental inp~ct due to the approval
of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject
prope~ty for aeneral industrtal land uses cocr.~ensurate with the nroposal; thai no
sensitive environmental Impacts are involved tn the proposal; that [he Intt(al Study
submTtted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative
advcrsc envlronmental impacts; and that the tlegative Declara[ion substantiatTng the
foregoing findings is on file. in thc City of Anaheim Plannin~ Department.
NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anahetm City Planntno Commission
~oes hereby deny subJec[ Petition for Condi[ional Use Permit on th~ basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOIt1G RESOLUTION ts slgned anJ aporoved hy ne this 2Cth day of
Harch. 1979.
NR .HF~ ~ N. C I Y PLt,NY i NG COM`1 I 5 I ON
ATTEST:
~~ ~ ~
SECRETARY, ANAHE IM C I TV PLAt;171 ~Jr COM~ I SS IOt!
STATE OF CALIFOR~~IA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF At1AHEiM )
I. EdfLh L. tlarrts. Secretary of the i.naheim City Fianning CommisSFon, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution r:as passed and adopteA at a meetTng of
the Anaheim Clty Planning Commisston hcld on March 2~. 197q, by the folloNing vote of
the menbers thereof:
AYES: COHMISSIO!d'eRS: BARNES, BUSHORE, HERBST, JONt~SO;!
NOES: LOMhISSIONERS: DAVi~, TOLAR
ABSENT: COM!115510tJER5: KING
14 WITNESS WHEREOF, i have nereunto set my ha~d this 2Fth day of March,
1479.
~a.~ ,f' ~.~.
SECRETAP. ~ ANAHEIM CI PLANNIuG COHMI55 ON
-2- PC79-61