PC 79-87RESOLUTION N0. PL 79-87
RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY P~ANNiNr, GOr1nIS510N
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANLE N0. 3085 BE GRAIITED
NHEREAS, the Anaheim Ci[y Planntng Lommfssfon did receive a verified
Petition for Vartance fran WILLIAM STEVEN GALA AND SANDRA LOUISE GALA, 1883 North
Coronet Place, Anahetm. Calffornia 92801~ owners of certain real property situated in
the City of Anahetm, tounty of Orange, State of California described as:
Lot 145 OF TRACT 2390, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS PER MAP RECORDED
IN 800K 71, PAGES T1 TO 14 INCLUSIVE, OF MISCELL.ANEOUS MAPS, IN
THE OFFICF OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID ORA~~GE COUfITY.
IlHEREAS, the City Plannfng Commission did schedule a public heartng at the
~ity Hall in the City of Anahelm on March 26, 1979, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as reauired by lari anJ ln accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Munfcipal Code, Chapter 18.U3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against satd proposed variance and to investigate and make findi~gs
and rec~nmendations in connection therewith; said pu6lic hearina having been
con[inued to the Pianning Commissfon meettng of May 7, 1979, and
4JHEREAS, said Commissio~, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after Jue consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the follo,.~~ina facts:
1. That the peti[foner proposes a waiver of the followGng to retain a room
addition in an exlsting garage.
SECTIO~! 18.26.066.Q11 - Minimum number and type of parking spaces.
(2 enclosed spaces reoulred; 1 proposed)
2. That the above-mentloned waiver Is hereby qranted on the basis that the
petitioner demonstrated that a hardshtp exists In that denial would deprive subject
property of privileges heTng anJoyed hy ot~er properiics in thc same zone and
vicini[y.
3. That there are excPptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do
not apply generally to the praperty or class nf use in the same vicinlty and zone.
4. That the requested varfance Is necessary for [he preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property r(ght possessed by other proper[y tn thc same
vicinity and zone, and denied to the propcrty (n question.
5. That the rcquested variance will not be materfalty detrimental to the
public Helfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vtcinity and zone
in which the properiy is located.
PC79-87
6. That no one lndfcated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was re=eived in opposltton to the subject
petitfon.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planntng Director or his authorized
representat ve has determined that the proposed proJect falls rrichtn the definftfon
of Ga[egortcal Exemptions. Classes 2 and 5, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of
Anahefm Environmental Impact Rcport Guidalines and Is, therefore, categortcally
exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning CommissTon
does hereby grant subjeci Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which
are hereby found to be a necessary prerequtsite to the proposed use of the subject
property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Lttlzens of tfie
City of Anaheim:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantialiy in accordance
with plans and specificaclons on file wiih che Ctty of Anahelm marked Exhibit No. 1;
with the exceptton [hat the owner(s) of suFject property shall modify the existing
garage conversion to provtde one enclosed par~(ng space.
2. That the existin9 structure shall be hraught up to the mirtimum
standards of the C1ty of Anahelm, tnclud(ng the Uniform Building, Housing, Plumbing,
Electrical, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim.
3. Tha[ Condttion ~los. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be complted with
Within 90 days from the date of approval of [his variance.
BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED [hat the Anahetm Ctty Planning Lommission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolu[fon is expressly predlcated upon
applicant's compllance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set farth.
Should any such condttion, or any part thereof, 6e declar~d invalid or u~enforcrable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolutton,
and any approvals heretn con[alned, shall he deemed null and void.
THE FOREUOING RESOLUTION is slgned and approved by me this 7ih day of May,
1979.
IRHAN, AN I GITY PL tNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~ .~ ~t~.:.
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- Pt79-87
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORA~~GE ) ss.
CITY OF AtIAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris. Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission~ do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolutlon was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim CTty Planntng Cor.mtsslon heid on May 7, 1979, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BUSHORE, DAVID, NERBST. JOH~ISON, KING, TOLAR
NOES: CONM~SSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
iN WIT~IE55 SJHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of May, 1979.
~~ ~ ~~
SECRETARY. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING GOMMISSION
-3- PC79-87