PC 79-93RESOLUTION H0. PC79-33
A RESOLU7101~ OF TNE AI~HEIM GITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PET1710N FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 78-79-4o BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Cortmission did receive a verified
Petition for Reclassification from JAY J. WALL, ET AL, 1345 North Grand Avenue,
Santa Ana, California 9270l, owners, and RANDALL W. BLANGIIARD, 16371 Beach
Boulevard, Huntington Beach, California 92b47, agent, of certafn real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, Gounty of Orangc. State of California,
described as:
The North 346,00 feet of the East half of the Northe~st quarter
of the Soucheast quarter of Section f2, Township 4 South. Range
11 uest, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as shown on a Map recorded
in book 51, Page il of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the
County Recorder of Orange County, California. Except the
Nesterly 75.00 feet of the Easterty 242.50 fee[ of the Northerly
120.40 feet the reof. Also except the Sou[h 125.00 feet of the
East 270.00 feet thereof; and thc Nest 75.00 feet of the East
242,50 feet of the North 120.00 fee[ of the t~orthcasc quar[er of
the Southeast quarter of Section 12, Township 4 South~ Range 11
West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as shown on a map recorded in
4~H 51, page I1 of Hiscellaneous Haps, in the office ~f the
County Rccorder of said County.
WHEREAS, the City Plan~ing Commission did hoid a public hearing at the
City Hall in [he Lity of Anaheim on May 21, 1979, at 1:30 p.m.~ notice of said
public hearing havi~g been duly given as requlrec! by law and in accordance with
the provisfons of the Anaheim Muntcipal Godc, Chapter 18,03, to hcar and
considar evidence for and against said pr~posed r~classificatfon and to
investigate and. make findings and recommendatians in connection therewi[h; and
ilHEkEAS, said Gommission, af[er due inspection, invcstigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and
reports offered at said hearing, does flnd and determtne the following facts:
1. That the pe[itloner proposes reclassificacion of subjeci property
from the RS-A-43,000 ~Residential/Agricultural) Zone to the RM-3000 (Residential.
Multiple-Family) Zo~e.
2. That the Anaheim Ge~eral Plan deslgnatcs subJect property for
medium density residential land uses.
3• That Che proposed reclasslficatton of subJect property fs necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and propar development of the community.
4. That the p roposed reclassification of subJect property does prop~rly
relate to [he zones and their permitted uses locally establtshed in close proximity
to subJect property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
PC79-93
5. That the proposec; reclassification of subJect property requires
the improvement of abutting streets in accardance aith the Circulatton Element
of the General Plan, due to tfie antictpated increase tn trafftc Hhich will be
generated by the intenstffcatfon of land usc.
6. That no onc indic.ated their presence at safd public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence aas recetved in opposition to subJect
peti tion,
ENVIRONMENTAL tMPACT fIN01NG; That thc Anahcim Lity PlannEng Commission
has revieaed [he proposa to rec assify subject propercy from the RS-A-43,000
(Residential/Agricultural) Zone to the RM-3000 (Resfdential, Multiplc-Family)
Zone Hith waiver of rtwximum building height to establish a one-lot, 44-unic,
RM-3000 (Residenr,ial, Multiple-Family) Zone condominium subdivision on an
irregulariy-shaped parcel of land consis[ing of approxtmatety 3,G acres located
at che southwes[ corner of CrescenY Avenue and Magralia Avenue, having approxi-
mato fron[ages of 605 feet on the south side of Crescent Avenue and 180 feei on
the west side of Maynolia Avenue; and does hereby approve the Negacive
Declara[fon from [he requirertr_nt to prepare an environmental tmpac[ report on
the basis that there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse
envtronmen[al impact c+ue to che approval of this 1~egative Ueclaration since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the subjec[ property for mcdlum density residen-
[ial land uses commensuratc wfth the proposal; that no sensitive environmental
impac[s are invoived in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by [he
petitioner indEcates no stgnificant individual or tumufative adverse environ-
mental impacts; and that the Nega[(ve Dectaration substantiating the foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Pianning Department.
NOW, THEREfORE, ESE IT RESOLVED Chat the Anaheim City Planning Commissi~n
dces hereby grant s~bject Petition for fieclassification and, by so doing, that
Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Hunicipal Code be amended to exclude the above-
described property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residen[ial/Agricultural) Zone and to
incorporate said described property into [he RM-3000 (Residential, Multiple-
Family) Zone upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a
necessary prcrcRv~slte ta Lhc proposcd use af sutject pro~,crcy in order to
preserve the safety and generai welfare of the Citizens of the Ctty of Anaheim:
1. That s[reet lighting facilities along Crescen[ Avenue and Magnolia
Avenue shall be installed prior to thc final butlding and zoning inspec[ions
unless otherwise approved by [he Director of Public Utflities, and in accordance
with spectfications on file in the affice of the Dtrector of Public Uttiities;
andlor that a bond, certificaLC of deposit, letter of credit. or cash, in an
amount and form sattsfactory to the City of Anahetm shall be posted with the
City [o guarantee the fnstallation of the above-mentioned requirements.
2. That the owner(s) of subJect proper[y shall pay to the City of
Anaheim a fee, in an amount as desermined by the City Council, for tree planting
purposes alonq Crescent Avenue and Magnolta Avenue,
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved pians on file with the office of [he Director of Public Works.
4. That fire hydrants st~all bc tnstalled and charged as requlred and
dete rtnined to be necessary by che Chief of the Fire Department prtor to
commencement of structura) framtng.
'2' PC79-93
5. 7hat subJect property shall be served by under9round utllities.
6. That drainage of subJect property shail b~~ disposed of in a manner
satisfactory [o the City Engineer.
7. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay co the Gity of
Anaheim the appropria[e park and recrcation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the Ci[y Council, said fees to be pafd at the time the building
permit is issucd.
3. That a modffied cul-de-sac shall be constructed at the terminus of
Stockton Avenue subjeci to the approval o~ the Li[y Engineer.
9. Tha[ ali prtvate streets shall be developed tn accordance with the
City of A~aheim's standard for private streets, includfng the installation of
street lights as required by the standard.
10. That an ordinance rezontng the subject property shall tn no event
become effective excep[ upon or folla+ing the recordatlon of Final Tract Map tdo.
10710 withtn [he ttme specified in Government Code Section 66463.5 or such
furGher time as the advisory agency or City Council may grant.
11. That the a+ner(s) of subJect propercy sha11 pay the traffic slgnal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3846j, in an amount as determined by the City
Council, for each new d-+elling unit prior to the issuance of a building permit.
12. Prtor to the iniroductfon of an ordinance rezoning sub)ect property.
Condltio~ Nos. 1, 2 and 10, above nentioned, shall be completed. The provisions
or rights granted by this resolution shail become nuti and void by action of Che
Planning Commission unless said conditions are complied wlth within one year from
the date hereof, or such further ttme as the Planning Comnission may grant.
13• That Condition Nos. 3. 5. 6, 8 and 9, above mentioned, shall be
complied with p~ior co final Duilding and zoning inspections.
Bt IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Rnaheim Gity Pianniny tarrni~sion does
hereby find and de[crmine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated
upon the applicani's compliance with each anJ all of the conditions hereinabove
set forth. Should any such condition, or a~y pert thereof, be declared invalid
or unenforceable by the final judgmenc of any court of competent Jurtsdiction.
then [his Resolut(on~ and any approvais hereln c~~tai~ed, shall be deemed null
and vaid.
7HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is siqned and approved by me this 21st day of
May, 1979.
. ~ ~
N, TY PL NING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
d 1:~. . ~
SECRETARY, AWIHEIN CI Y PLAkNING COMMISSION
-3- PG79-93
0
l ~ .1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANANEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris~ Secratary of the Anahcim City Planning Commission~
do hereby cerCify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on May 21~ t979, by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMtSSIOt~fRS: BARNES, BUSHORE, DAVID, fiERBST, JOHNSOtJ, KtNG, TOLAR
;~OES: LOMMISSIO~~ERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
1979.
IN WITNESS WHEREQF, 1 have hereunto s~t my hand this 21st day of May,
~.,, ~J ~t° ~:,
SELRETAR~, ANAHEIM GITY PLANNItIG COMMISSiON
-4- PC79-93