PC 80-100R[SCL'JTIOU I10. f Cu0-lrlrl
A RES^UJTIO~! OF Tfl[ A1lAlIEIFt CITY PL!?II;JI~Ir.- Cf?h1htISS101:
TII~,T Pl:TiTIOr! FOF CO~ICI i IOtIP,L LSE PCRIIIT I1f!. ?n~r, G[ DEf(IED
4lIIERE/1S, the /lnaheim City Planninr Conr:iission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Perciit from LC/15C-/1LL LA PALI?A, 15!1!F Soutt, llnaheim
tSoulevarJ, "A", Anahein, California, ~2(~05, awner, and ROSCRT ~i. LFAVERTOtJ (TtIE
L[AVERTON COFIPA~IY), 1591! South Anahcir,~ Boulev.~rd, "~", Anahcim, California 92£305,
agent, of certain real propcrty situat~d in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, clescribed as:
Parcel 1~~ in the City of Anaheici, County of Oranye, State of
Calirornia, as shcw~n on mar filed in Dool; 13? of Parcel Maps,
p<iges 6 and 7, in ti~c office of the County Recorder of said
County.
WHEP,F.l15, the City Planning Corunission dicl hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anahein on June 1G, 19(;0, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having bcen duly givPn as required by lav~ anci in accordance ~~ith the
provisions of the ~n~heim Flunici~~a1 Code, Cliapter 1F,~~, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed con~litional use pen;~it and to investigate and
make findings and recommenJations ir. eonnection thereti•iith; and
b1fIEREAS, said Commission, after due ins~ection, investi~ation and study made
by itself and in its beti~lf, ancl after due c.onsideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find ancJ determine the follaving facts:
1. That the proposeu use is properly ~ne for ti~ihich a conditional use
perrniL is autiwrizecl uy Nnaiieim 11unicipaf Lode Section 1&.Gi.;1~0.E05 to wit: to
permit industrially-oriented commerciai sales and office uses in the f1L (industrial,
Limited) Zone.
2. That the proposai is hereby denied on thc basis that the uses specified
by the petitioner are too general in nature and that in order to protect the
inte~rity of the industrial zone, the Planninc~ Commission 4~ishes to consider each use
indivicJually to insure ttiat such uses actually service the industrial area.
3. That tlie {~roposeci use will adversely affect the adjoir.ing land uses and
the yrowth and development of the area ir which it is proposed to be located.
4, That thc size anJ snape of the site proposed for the use is not
adequate to alloar thc full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to Cfic particular are~ nor to the peace, he~ltf~, safety, and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City o` Anahciri.
5. That Che granting of the conc:itional use ~ermit under the conditions
imposeti, if any, ti•rili be detriciental to the peace, health, safety, and 9eneral
welfare of the Citizens of the City of ~~naheim.
PCSO-100
6. That the traffic ~~eneratc~l by the proposeJ use will impose an undue
burden upon the streets and hi~h~•rays designecl and imp mved to carry the traffic in
the area.
7, That no one indicated their presence at s~id public hearing in
opposition; and that no corres~ondence:~~as received in opposition to the subject
petition.
EiIVIROP1Pi[IITAL lMPACT FIFIDItdC: That the Anahrim City Plann:n9 Cormiission has
reviewed the proposal to pernit industriaily-oriente~ wmmercial sales and office
uses in the ML (Industrial, Lin~ited) Zone on 2n irregularly-shaped parcel of land
consisting of a~proximately ~.2~ acres having a frontage of approxirr.ately 210 feet or,
the north side of La Palrr~a Avenue, having a maximum depth of approximately 725 feet
and being located approximat°ly 67~ feet east of the centerline of Van (3uren Street;
and does hereby approve the Ilegative Declaration frorn the requirer~ent to prepare an
environmental impact report on the basis that there a~ould be no significant
individual or cumulative aclverse environmental impacC due to the approval of this
yeyative Declaration since the Anaheim Gener~l Plan designates the subject property
for general industrial land use_' comriensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive
environnental im,pacts are i~valved in the ~roposal; that the Initial Study submitted
by the pet;ti~ner indicates no significant incliviclual or cumulativE adverse
environriental i~npacts; and tnat the tlegative Declaration substantiating the foregoing
findings is on file in the City af Anaheim Plannin~ Department.
tlOll, TNEREFORE, 3E IT RESOLVED that thc Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereb;~ deny subject Pe[ition for Conditional Use Permit on tt~e basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THC FOREGOItJG RcSQLUTI0t1 is signed and approved by me this 1Gth day of June,
19~30.
/ /w ~
~/ '/
CIIAIRi AN PRO TEP1 RE
AtIAIIEI PI CITY PLl1~1;11 t:G COP1M1 SSIOtI
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, Atl~Pt C~ PLAtJt~~~~11SSI0P!
- 2-
PC80-100
.ea.
STAT[ OF C/1l l FORP! IA )
COUIlTY OF ORAtJGE ) ss.
CITY OF AIlAIIEIFI )
~
I, Edith L. flarris, Secretary of the Anaheiri City Pianninq Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoiny resolutiun 4/]S passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on Junc 1G, 19^•0, at 1:~0 p,m.,by the
following vote of the mernbers thereof:
AYES: COt1PIISSIOtiEP,S: 13USHfiRE, DAVID, FRY, IiERCST, Y,INf, TOLAR
NOES: COt1~115510FIERS: NO1dE
AE3SENT: CON111SS10~lERS: [3ARI~ES
I!! tJITtJESS YlIIEP,EOF, I have hereunto set my hancJ this 1Gth ciay of June, 1980.
/f ~ ~ / ~FK/ QJ
SECRETl1RY, ,4!lAHEIN CITY PLANtlIfJG COH~IISSIO~J
'3' PCIIO-100
1