PC 80-102RFSQLUTION t10, PC~~-1~"L
A RESOLUTIOR OF Tf!F. ll!I/111E1?1 CITY PL~Pt'il~1r C~~t~~ISSI^N
TIIAT PETITIOIJ F03 °[CLl1SSIFIC.qTlO~l No, 7~-^n_[,~ DE rRAr1TED,
WHEREAS~ the Anaheim City Planning Commission d(d receive a verified
petition for Reclassification fror~ E. J. CA4ATT1'Il A'JD P,IT~ r,pPaTTl~tl, ET AL, 9~~7~
Terry~•~oed Road, Santee, California ~32^71, o4mers, and 1~11E G. lIRiAS, ~~~ South San
Gabriel E3oulevard, San ;ahriel, California ~177;~ aocnt, of ccrtain reai property
sttue.ed in the C(ty of Anahetm, County of Orange, Statc of Cali`ornia, descrlbed as
follo~,~s:
Beginning at a point on the South Iine o` the ~lest one-haif of the
Southeast quarter of thc Southeast quarter nf Sectton 1;, Toi.inship
~F South P,ange 11 West, S,B,B, ~!
Southcast corner of said 4!est one-half {~~ Lr~~~n f~'~t'~+est of the
along the South llne of said West ~nPnha~f~nnin~ thence 4lest
North parallel to thc 4.~est line of said t:est one7half,fe~t; thence
to a point on the Southerly linc of the right ofsway2offthe
Pacific Electric Railre~d; thence Sou[heasterly along s~id ri~ht
of way line 92.3^ feet; thence Soutfi parallcl to ttic .lest line of
said 4!est one-half 535.72 feet to the point of he~innln~, in the
City of Anaheim, County of Oranne, State c` California.
WNERFAS, the City Planning Corr,iissinn dtd ho!:1 a pub)fc he~ring at the City
t1a11 in tfie City o` Anaheim on June 3~~ 1~3~, at 1•3n p,~,,~ n~ticr of 5~(d public
hearing having been duly given as required hy 1a~.; anr~ in accordance ~•iith the
provisions of the Anahetm Municipal Code, Chapter 1?,~3, to heir an~i consider
evidence for a~d against said proposed reclassification and to investi~ate and make
findings and reeomMendations in connection tht~rr~•~i±ti• ~~.~
IJHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investia~tic+n and study made
bY itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of a11 evidencr and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and deternine the fo1lo~.iin~ facts:
the RS-q,lE3~~~~at ttie petitioner proposes reclassific~tion of subject prnperty from
(Residential/Agricuitural) Zone to thc R~!-3~~~ (Residential,
flultiple-Family} Zone.
2, That the /lnaheim General P)an designates suhject property for medium
density residential land uses.
3. That tize proposed reclasslfication of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderiy and prnper development of thn communitv.
k. That tfie proposed reclassification of suhject pronr_rty d~es properly
relate to the zones and their pernitted uses locally est~hltshed tn close proximity
to subject property and to the z~,nes and thetr pcrmitted uses generally established
throughout the ~:or,munity.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject pronertv requires tLe
:ledieation of abutting streets in acc~rdance tyit:h thr_ Clrculation Element of the
PC3~-1'l2
General Plan, due to the ~ntici~~-~tecl increas^ in trrif°ic ~:'~ic`~ ~:ill !;e. nenerated hy
the intensification o` land use.
6. 7hat n~~ one indieatc:i t`~^_ir r,res^ncc ~t said public hcarinc in
opposiLion; •~nd that no c~rrespon~encr ~~a~ r^ceived in nonnsition t~ the subjeet
petition.
EIIV1~20!1HEiJTAL 1;iPACT F1~171':G: That the ~lnahcim City Pianninc Cor~~nission has
reviewed the proposal to reclassify su~icct nr~ocrtv `r~~ t~c FS-^-1i',~^~
(P.esidential/Agriculturai) 7.on~ to thc „'-3n^~(^esid~nt~~~, 'lultiole-Farily) Zone [o
eonstruet a one lot. 1Z-uni[ residential condo^~iniun suhdivision ~;ith ~•~aivers of
minimu^~ lot area per dwelling unit, naximun ~*_ructural !~ci~ht and minimum
recreational-leisure area on an irrcyularly-sh~ped parr_el af lan~i consistinq of
ap?roximately 0.' acrc having a frontaae o` a~pror.in~tely ?~~ feet on the north side
of Ball Road, !~aving a maxtmum dept'~ of approxir~atcly 5~C1 `cet ~n~! F,eing loeated
approximately 1120 feet o+est of t1~e centcrline of i'nott Strect; and do~s herehy
approve the "7e~attve Declaration fron the renuirenent [o nrenarc~ an em~irnn~ent~l
impact repor[ on the basis Lhzt the~e ti••oul~f be nr. si9nificant in~!ividual or
cumulativc adv~rse enviro~nental inpact duc to the ioproval of t`+is '~eaative
Declaration since the ~nahein ~eneral Pian desiqnates t~e suhject p mperLy fc,r nedi~nn
Jensity residential land uses corri~nsurate^ ~~ith, the„frohns~lnitial~Stu~iv sub~nittede
environnenEai inpdcES are irvclvc.. tn c.~^ .re~_s~.l; t• i
by the petitioner in~licate5 no sir,nificant individual or cunulitive idverse
environnental impacts; and t'~aL the :Jegitive ~eclaration su~st~nt::+tir.n thP °oreaoing
findings is ~n fil~ in t`~c Ci[y of Anahcin °lanninr ~enart~'er.t.
tl0l:~ TI~EREFO°.E, CE IT °FS~L~'E~ that the 4n~h~~^+ ~~ty 'lanninn Cor+mission
does herehy grant suh,jec; °etition for Reclassi`ic~tion and, 'v sn cloinp, thit Title
1R-Zoning of t!~e Anahein `lunicip~l Code be anended tn exclude the ahove-~eserihed
property from the RS-A-1~3.0'J~ (R[SID['ITIAL/A~R~CULTUP,AL) Z^'1E ~nd t~ incorporate said
~~c~rjh..~1 n~~~rrr~ lnto [tie ~"~-~~~~ 12E51[1F'lTIAL. '1~.I~TIPLE-FA`11LY) 7.O~IF upon the
follo~•~inq eonditions ~+•~~ie!i ar^ herehy found to '~e a necessary prer~quisice eu t1~G
proposed use of su~.ject ~roperty in order to nres~rvr_ the safetv i'+~' ~Pn~ra1 4~clfare
of the Citizens of the City of ~n~hei,•~:
1. That t'ic o~.~nnr(s) of su~ject nrnncrtv ~hall d~ari t~ thr City of Anahcin
a strip of land 53 fcet in ~•+idt`~ fr«~ tf~e centerlinc of the strr~t alon~ 2a11 4oad
for street ~rldening purposcs.
2. That an ordinance rezoninn t'~e subject prn~~rty shall in ^o evert
becone effeetive excert upon or follo~.+ing the recordation of Final Tract Map No.
~~p7~3 witnin the time specified in Government Codc ~ect~on C~~r3.~ or such further
tine as the advtsory agency or City Council nay ar.in[.
3. That subjcet proncrty shill t~c sr;vc~1 t,y unrfcrqro~ln~1 utillties.
4, That drain~~c of subj~~c[ prorerty shill b^ dis?osed of in a nanner
satisfaetory to thc City En~incer,
5. Tha[ the owncr of suhject oropcrty shall piY [o t~e Ci*.y of P~nahct^ t~e
appropriate park and reereatlon in-licu fec~ ~s <l~t~~rlned to ~c ~PP~~F~~~~e hY th"
City Cou~cil~ said fecs to be n~id at thc tinc thc t,uil~tina perr~lt is lssued.
-2- Pf3^-ln,
G. That thc o~;!ncr(s) of sut:ject propcrty shall pay thc traffic signal
assessncnt `~c (Orciinanr.c ;lo. 3~'?6) in an anount as detcrnined by thc City Council~.
for each neri d~rellinca unit prior to the issuanc~ of a building permit.
7. That the o~~ner(s) of subject prooerty shall submit to Che Planning
Comnission a Ir.ttcr rrqu~sLing thc termination of Conditional Use Pernit ~do. 133'.
f~. That trash stora~r_ areas shall 'ne provided in aceordanee wlth a;.pru:ed
plans on file oiith ihe Offiee of thc Exec~tive ~ireetor of Puhlic ~lorks.
9. That suhject aroperty shall be develeped suhstanttally in aecordance
wlth plans and specifications nn file r~ith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Mos. 1
throug!~ 3.
1~. That vehicular turninq ar^_a ai the northerly terminus of the driveway
be indicatcd as a'no parl:ing' area.
11. Prior to ttie in[rod~~ction of an ordinance rezonina subject property,
Conditio~ ~los, i and ~, ahove-mr_ntioned~ shall hc conpleted, The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall becore niill and void by action of the
Planning Com issSon unless said conditions are conplied iiit~ ~•rithin one year from the
date here^f, or suc!~s fcsrther ti~e as t?;e Fianning Commission may arant.
12. That Condition 'Jos. 3, ~s, c~ ; and 1f1, ahove-mentioned, shall be
conplicd aitt5 prior to final huil,ling and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHE? RESOLVED that [he A~aheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and deterntne that adoption of this Resolution is exrressly predicated upon
applicant's conpllance ~:,ith each and all of tl,e conditlons hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition~ or any part tt~ereof, he der_lared invalid or unenforceable
by thc finai judqnent of any cnurf ~f c~^+..~r....r ~~..t~.±~`~i....~ ~,y~;~ ~~;I; ^,~sc~utlon,
and any aprrovals herein contained, sna11 he cieemed nuli and void.
THE FOP.EGOING RESOLUTIO~; is sioned and approved hy rne this 3~th day of June,
1Q3o.
ATTEST•
~~~~~w
CN l!0"!A~•; ~ F A~~ ~1~ ~ L!1yM N6 CO'1MrSSTOM
E RE R~ tJ HEltt CIT L~!ti Nr, C~1MIS 10"t
-Z- Pf,3,'1-1 f?7.
STATE OF CAL i FORtJ I~~ )
COUNTY OF' OP,AhJGE 1 ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Fdtth L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commisston, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution ~•ras passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Rnaheim City Planning Commission held on June 30, 19Bn, by the follo~oing vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMPIISSIOMERS: BARNES, BUSHOP,E, FRY, HERGST, t;ING, TOLAR
NOES; COMMISSIOtJERS: MOPlE
ABSEtlT: COf1MIS510NERS: NQPlE
VACANCY: ONE SEAT
it! 611T~JESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3nth day of June, 1930.
(~ 4~4~ ~ !`k~L~r~
SECRETAR , APIAHEIM CITY PL44RdIN!; C~1IMISSION
-1E- PC"~-1~72