PC 80-109RES2LUTIOt! ~~p, pr,~~-1~~
A RESOLIlTIOt' OF THE At1AF!F I!1 C I TY Pi.A~~~l I H~ C~~~~t I SS I ~~I
P,[CG'1h1C`1D I'1G TO TIiC A"!411C. I'! C I TY Crn1i1C I L T!IAT GY,!11 R I T"E"
PROPOS I PI~ !1"1Ft1Dt1FNT OF A^,EA D[V~Lpp~1~?dT PLA11 P;O, 1'1^ BE oErit Fo
llHEZEIIS, on Au~ust 3, 1'1? i, tiie Anahe i m C i ty Counc i i ~ppl'OVed /lrea
Oevelopnent Plan i~fo. 1~3, Exhihit "D", Hodifieu, regarding vehicular access generally
bounded by I<raener Boulevard or, the east, La Nalma Avenue on the north, and the
Riverside Free~~ay on the south, and
4/HERE/1S, on April 21, l~~Ct, the petitioner (~f. 1•!. Ranill, Realty Ylorld-
Ranill Realty) requr_sted amendnent to Area Development Plan Ilo. 1~~ to delete a
portion of La Mesa Avenue located in unincorporated ~range County, t•iest of 4/hite Star
Avenue and north of the Riversirie Free~~ay, in order to ~llo~v develo~Ment of an
industrial conolex; and
4!N[REAS, the Planning Commission directed staff to set for ouhlic hearing
consideratlon of Amendment to Area ~evelonment Plan No, ln.°,; and
WhlEREAS, the Planning Department, pursuant t~ the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act, prenared a Negative Der.laration in r_onnectian
with the Amendment to Area D~velorment Pian IJo. 1~°; and
41f!F!2EA5, the Planning Commission did hol~.l a ou~~lic !iearinn at the City Nall
in the City of Anahein on June 3~~, 1~3^, at 1:3'? p.n., notice ~f said puhlic heartng
having been duly given as required by la~•~ and in accorrlance t•rith the provisions of
the Anaheim !1unici~al Code, to hear and considAr evidence for and a~ainst said
proposed area development plan amendment and to investinate anci malce Findings and
r~c~mmendations in connection therea~lth; an~i
4lIiEREl15, said Commission, after due investigation, and study, made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidrnce an~i reports offered at
said hearing, does find and det~rmine the follo~•~in9 facts:
1. That the suhject property is an frregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting
o` ~~nproximately 30.') acres hounded on the north by La Palma .4venue, on the
E.'t by Kraemer Boulev~rd, ~,nd on the south and p/P.SL by the Riverside
~ ~..r~ay.
2. That on June 2~3, 1~~1, the Planning Conmission recommended adontion of /lrea
Development Plan Plo, 1~8, folle~~ing a puhlir. hearinq, notice of said public
hearing having heen duly given as required F.y la~:~.
3. That Area Development Flan No, 1~`i, estahiishinq a collector an~J ?ocal
street circulation pattern for suhject area, was anproved hy the City
Council on Auqust 3, 1^71. Suhject ~lan extFnded R1ue Gum Street, retained
Uhite Star Avenue, a~lded Armando Street, ahandoned Canal Strret and r.rn~r~~i~~{
a ne~•~ frontage road ;La ~~1esa Av~nue) .
PC~~-1~~
~~, That La Mesa Avenue is pre,ently impro~~ed from Blue ,um Str~et easterly to
the Anaheim City Limits and serves an er,isting industrial compiex.
5, That the port(on of La Mesa Avenuc.bc~ing consid~rcd for ~leletinn by this
amendment is located bett~~een *_he Anahein City Linits an~l the southerly
tcrminus of Whitc Star ~venuc. Said nnrtian of blhite Star Avenue has not
been inproved and the ~djacent property to the north has not Feen rleveloped.
o, That five (5) persons indicate~i th~ir presence in orp~sition to suhject
request at the public hearings.
?, That other property o~~rners in the inmediate araa have developed their
properties in accorriance with Are~ Gevelonment Plan ~Jo. 1'1`?, as approved in
1~71, ~~rith a fronta9e roarl (La .'Sesa Glvenue) and that deletion of La Mesa
Avenue ti•:outd create hardships for those prooerties ~~ith existing freeway
ex~osure.
~!. That the Anaheim City Pl~nnin9 Conmission has determined that Amendment to
Area Develonment Plan rto. ~03, Ex.hthit,E, is inappronriate at t!-iis ttme and
no change should he made to the er.istin9 olan.
iJ041, TIiEP,EFOP,E, [3E I? RESOL!~ED that the An~';:in Cit~~ Planning Commission has
reviewed the pro~osai to ar~end F~rea Develonment Plan (Jo. ?^`±, enc~mpassing an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consistin_ry of approximately 3~,~1 acres hounded on
the north hy La Palma Avenue, on tne east hy I:raemr_r Boulevard, an~i on the south and
west by Riverside Free~•iay, to delete the portion of La Mesa Avenue located in
unincorporated Orange County i•rest of :/hite Star Avenue and north of the P,iverside
Freeway in order to develop certain pronerty ~•~1th an industrial com~lex; and ~loes
hereby approvc the ~4egative Declaration from t:'~e reouiremenT. to prep~re an
environmental imnact report on the basis that there ~•iould be no sinntficant
individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact riue co the appraval of this
Ne~ative Declaration; that nn sencitive e m~trnnm~ntai im~~crc ir~ fr.vn)v~~ in th~
proposal; th~t t}ie lnitial Study subnitted by the petitioner in~!icates no individual
o~ cunulative adverse environmental impacts; anrl that the Nevative Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the llnaheim City Planning
Depa rtment.
DE IT FtIRTNER RFSQLI/EJ, that pursuant to the foregoinq findings, the !',naheim
City Planning Con±nission does '~ereby recommend to the City Councit o` the City of
Anaheir~ that Amendment to Area Development Plan ~lo. ]n3, Exhibit "E", bP disapproved,
with no change to the current plan on the hasis of t`~e foregoing findings.
THE FOREGOIN~ RESOLUTION is signed and approved hy rse this 3~th day of June,
19&0,
~~~~~~,..~ ~ S~' J ll .~~.t~:/
CIIAIR!rQ~~A"i, A~'/111Ei~t CITY PLA~ININS COPIn+iSSiON
ATTEST:
~ ~.~ . ~~
SEfRETARY, AtlAIIE1~4 ClTY PL~1tJNlr!r, C~"~~11SSlOPi
-2- PCB~-1o9
STATE OF CALIFOR~IIA )
COUMTY OF OP,APJG[ ) ss.
C ITY OF ANlIFIE IM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the 6lnaheim City Planning Commission~ do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and arl~pted at a meettng of
the Anaheim City Planning Corrxr;isston held on June 3~, 1930, by ~he following vote of
the rnembers thereof:
AYES: COM~IISSIONERS: BARMES, BUSH02E, FR1', NERBST, KltlG, TOLAR
NO[S: C011"iISSIOPIERS: P1CNE
ABSEPIT: COM~4ISSIONERS: NONE
VqCANCY: OP!E SEAT
ild WIT`lESS 4/HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3~th day of June, 5960.
~ f ~ ~., ~ ~
SCCRETARY, AF!AHE f" C I PLANN I P1r, C0~1!1155 I OM
-'- Pr.3~-to~