PC 80-112RESOLUTION N0. PC 30-112
A r~ESOLUTIO~t OF THE ANANEIM CITY PLANNi~IG COM}11SS10~!
TNAT PETITION FOR kECLASSIFICATIOtI N0. ?.0-$1-2 BE DENIED
W~iEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a vertfied
Petition for ReclassiTication from LINDA M. GRAH.AM, S233F East Howard~ Whittier,
Californ(a 90G01, owner, and AtITJE HENDERSON~ (,00 West Roherta Avenue, Fullerton,
California 92G32, agent, of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Jrange~ State of Caiifornia. described as:
That portTon of Record of Survey Booi: i Paae 55 of Record of
Surveys~ in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California~ shown as Parcel No. 2 on a Map filed in 9ook 25 Page
ly of Parcel Maps~ (n the 0`fice of the County Recorder of said
Co~nty.
WH=REAS~ the City Planning CommTssion did hold a publlc hearing at the Lity
Hail in the City of AnaheTm on June 3'~. 19Z~, at 1:3~ P.m „ nocice of saTd public
hearirtg having been duly given a5 required by lar~ and in accordance with the
provlsions ~f the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence f~r and aaainst said oroposed reclassiftc:~tl~n ~nd t~ investi~ate and !~ke
findings anj recortenendations In connectlon therewith; and
WH_REAS, said Comntssfon~ after due inspection~ investiqatlon and study made
by ftself a~ci in its behalf~ and after due cons(deration of all ev(dence and reports
offer~d at said heartng, does flnd and deterrrine the foll~inq facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of sub~ect proper•ty from
the RS-7200 (Residentlal, Singie-Family) Zone to the R.`1-1200 (Residential, M.ultiple-
FamTly) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan destgnates suhJect prooerty for low
density and/or medium density residential land uses.
3. That approval of this reclassiftcation would result Tn "spa[ zoRTng" on
Cherry Way and would have an adverse impact on the nearhy single-family resfdential
uses.
4, That the proposed reclassification of suhject property is not necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper develooment c,f the ccxnr~un6ty.
5. That the proposed reclasstfication of suhsect pr-oparty does not
properly relate to t'~e zones and their permicted ~ses locaily estaF>listied Tn close
proximity to suFject property and to the zones and their pcrmitted uses acnerally
establish~d throuahout the communtty.
6. That approximately fifteen (15) persons indicated thelr presence at
sa:d public hearing in opposi[ton; and that no cnrresoondence was received in
opposition to the s~hject petition.
PC80-112
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Plannina Cortmission has
revie~Ned t e proposa to reclass y suhject property from the RS-77.00 (Residential~
Single-Family) Zone to the RM-1200 (Residential~ Multip'e-Family) Zone to construct a
4-unit apartment complex with waivers of maximum structural he?9ht and minimum
landscaped setback on a rectangularly-shaped parc~l of land consist(ng of
appr~ximately 577p square feet, having a frontage of appror,imately 5~ feet on the
east side of Cherry Way, havtng a maximum depth o` aoproxlmately 115 feet and being
located approximately 150 fee; south of [he center lfne of R~mneya Drive; and does
hereby disapprove the Negative Declaratton from the requirement to prepare an
environmental impact report on the basis that there would be signlfican[ individual
or cumulative adverse environmental impacts due to the approval of this Negatlve
Declaration in that reclasstfication would be "spot zoning" on Cherry Way; that
sens(tive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Inttial Study
submitted by the petitioner indicates significant ~ndividual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE~ that the Anahetm City Planning Commtssion
does hereby deny subject Petition for Reclassification on the hasis of the foregoing
findfngs.
THE FOREGOI~IG kESOLUTIO~! is signed and 3pp;oved by ne thlc 14th day ~f July,
133C.
ATTEST:
~
__~~~~~~t- ~'~ ~c/
CHAIRI!~MAt~~ AFIAH~'IM CITY PLAtJNIN; COMMISS104
/
~ I,C~~ `'~ 7J~ ~ .
Ot / TiCi'/L.t.c..
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIn CITY PLAMNING COMMISSt0~7
STATE OF CA~ 1 F(1R1t ~ 4 1
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF A~lAHEIM )
I, ~dith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plannlna Commission, do
hereby certlfy that the foregoing resolution was passed and ad~pted at a meetino of
the Anahe(m Ctty Plan~ing Commission held on July 14~ 1~°~~ by the foliowing vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BUSHORE, FRY~ KI~~r
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSE~IT: COMMISSIONERS: HERaST
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIOtJERS: TOLAP,
VACANCY: ONE SEAT
IN WIT~IESS WHEREOF~ I have here.~nto set my hand this it+th day of July~ 1980.
L~'~S'~C.t~ f~ ~ ~.t.t. ~.
SEC?ETARY~ Ar~AHEIM CITY IANtJING COHMISSION
-2- PC80-112