PC 80-12RESOLUTION NO. PC8n -12
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 79 -80 -22 BE GRANTED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from TERRY KEITH POCOCK, 1735 West Katella Avenue,
Orange, California 92667, and CITY OF ANAHEIM, 204 East Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim;
California, 92805, owners, and MICHAEL T. COLLINS AND JOHN J. KOGLER, 1400 N. Bristol
Street, Suite 245, Newport Beach, California 92660, agents, of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
follows;
That portion of Lot 23 of "Anaheim Extension ", as shown on a Map
of Survey made by Wm. Hamel on file in the office of the County
Recorder of Los Angeles County, California, described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of said Lot 28, said
point being South 15 deg. 38' 25" East 562.00 feet from the
Northwesterly corner of said Lot 28; thence continuing along said
Westerly line South 15 deg. 38' 25" East 225.41 feet; thence South
70 deg. 51' 19" East 127.87 feet; thence South 85 deg. 22' 37"
East 66.48 feet to the Westerly prolongation of that certain
course in the deed to the City of Anaheim, recorded April 14, 1977
in Book 12147, Page 226 of Official Records of Orange County,
California, having a hearing of South 85 dea. 58' 53" West and a
length of 224.77 feet; thence along said Westerly prolongation
North 85 deg. 58' 53" East 150.59 feet to the Westerly terminus of
said course; thence along the Southwesterly line of said deed to
the City of Anaheim North 71 deg. 11' 28" West 166.55 feet and
North 46 deg. 31' 21" West 299.28 feet to a line parallel with the
Northerly line of said Lot 28 that passes through the point of
beginning; thence along said parallel line South 74 deg. 26' 40"
West 23.66 feet to the point of beginning; and
That portion of Lot 23 of Anaheim Extension, as shown on a Map of
Survey made by William Hamel, filed in book 3, pages 163 to 165,
inclusive of Miscellaneous Records, in the office of the County
Recorder of Los Angeles County, California, and that portion of
the Easterly half of Citron Street as shown on said Map vacated by
Order of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange on May
7, 1913, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the
Easterly line of the land described in the deed to the State of
California (1100) recorded in book 2620, page 240 of Official
Records, in the office of the County Recorder of said County of
Orange, distant thereon South 16 degrees 47' 10" East, 452.00 feet
from the Northerly terminus of said line; thence North 78 degrees
04' 54" West, 30.51 feet; thence North 45 degrees 24' 33" West,
17.24 feet; thence North 19 degrees 55' 46" West 82.53 feet to a
tangent curve concave Southwesterly having a radius of 149.00
feet; thence along said curve Northwesterly through an angle of 74
degrees 05' 21 ", an arc distance of 192.67 feet; thence South 85
degrees 53' 53" West, 224.77 feet' thence North 71 decrees 11' 28"
West, 166.55 feet; thence North 46 degrees 31' 21" West, 299.88
feet to the Northerly line of that certain parcel of land
described in deed (1097) to the State of California recorded in
book 2789, page 445 of Official Records, in last said office;
thence along said Northerly line North 74 degrees 26' 40" East,
355.09 feet to the Easterly line of the land described in said
deed recorded in book 2789, page 445; thence along last said
Easterly line, South 15 degrees 37' 30" East, 190.06 feet to the
Northwesterly corner of that certain 10.29 acre parcel of land
described in deed recorded in book 258, page 332 of Deeds, in last
said office; thence along the Northerly line of said certain
parcel North 74 degrees 27' 35" East, 307.69 feet to said Easterly
line of the land described in said deed recorded in book 2680,
page 240; thence along last said Easterly line South 16 degrees
47' 10" East, 452.00 feet to the point of beginning.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on January 14, 1980, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from
the RS -A- 43,000 (Residential /Agricultural) Zone to the RM- 3000 (Residential,
Multiple- Family) Zone.
2. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is hereby
granted subject to the condition that prior to the introduction of an ordinance
rezoning subject property, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City
of Anaheim pursuant to Government Code Section 65915, et seq., to guarantee that the
maximum sale price of not less than eighteen (18) units shall qualify as low and
moderate cost housing pursuant to terms by the City of Anaheim Housing and
Neighborhood Preservation Department.
3. That although the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for
commercial recreational land uses, General Plan Amendment No. 156 to amend that
designation to medium density - residential land uses is currently under consideration
and subject reclassification would be in conformance with the Anaheim General Plan as
it is proposed to be amended.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary
and /or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the community.
-2- PC80 -12
6. That one person indicated his presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the RS -A- 43,000
(Residential /Agricultural) Zone to the RM -3000 (Residential, Multiple- Family) Zone to
construct an 86 -unit condominium complex with waivers of minimum building site area
per dwelling unit, maximum building height, maximum site coverage, minimum floor
area, minimum recreational- leisure area, minimum number of parking spaces, required
parking space location, and structural setback on an irregularly- shaped parcel of
land consisting of approximately 4.49 acres located at the southerly terminus of
Citron Street approximately 560 feet south of Vermont Avenue, having a frontage of
approximately 370 feet on the south side of the public alley and a maximum depth of
approximately 480 feet; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the
requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the hasis that there would
be no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the
approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the
subject property for commercial recreation land uses commensurate with the proposal;
that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the
Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning
Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
18- Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above - described
property from the RS- A- 43,000 (RESIDENTIAL /AGRICULTURAL) ZONE and to incorporate said
described property into the RN-3000 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE- FAMILY) ZONE upon the
following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare
of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement
of structural framing.
2. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
3. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recreation in -lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the
City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
4. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3896) in an amount as determined by the City Council,
for each new dwelling unit prior to the issuance of a building permit.
5. That a minimum 6 -foot high masonry wall shall be constructed along the
north property line adjacent to the public alley, the east property line abutting
commercial - recreational uses, and the southwesterly property line abutting the
freeway and freeway on-ramp, provided that no wall shall be required in locations
where buildings abut the property lines.
-3- PC80 -12
6. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
through 3.
7. That prior to the introduction of an ordinacne rezoning subject
property, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Anaheim
pursuant to Government to Government Code Section 65915 et seq., to guarantee that
maximum sale price of not less than eighteen (18) units shall qualify as low and
moderate cost housingpursuant to terms established by the City of Anaheim Housing and
Neighborhood Preservation Department.
8. That Condition Nos. 2, 5 and 6, above- mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
TEIE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 14th day of
January, 1980.
ATTEST:
oiLLiCk 1 Afebt
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
CHAIRMAN, ANAHE M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on January 14, 1980, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, DAVID, FRY, HERBST, KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BUSHORE
1980.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14th day of January,
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC80 -12