PC 80-125~:"
RESqLUT10~. ~10. PC?^-12,
~ RESOl.UT10'; OF T(IF A~iAiIE I'1 C ITY PLA~I~II'JG C~M`"ISS I'~P!
T!IAT PETITION FnR ~p;~~~T~~~~~L UcE PER'11T h1Q, ?~l~a yF DFhIIFD
WFIER[AS, the l4naheim City Plannin~ Comriissi~n di~l receive a verified
Pet i t i on for Co~~ i t iona 1 Use Pern i t from fRA~tCFS ~1, E3ARTLETT, 71 1 Morth Harbor
8oulevard, Anahein, California, 92•".~5, o~mer, and CHERI.FNE J. 4/111le~.±c n~;~
MAY,ItaE 11. S4.iFll~l, 9~f0 Nantucl;et Str~et, La ~labra, i;al i fornia ~OF31 ~ agents, of
c~r~dj~~ reai oroperty situated in the City of Anaheiro, Countv of Orange, St~te
of California, described as;
Lots 3 and 4 of Tract PJo. 7p1, in thc City of Flnaliein, as shoo-m on
a map recorded in book 10, page %;?. of !liscellaneous 'iap;, records
of Orange County, California.
b/HEREl;S, the City Planning Comnission did hold a puhlic hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on liugust il, 1;3~, at 1:3~ p.m., notice of said public
hearin9 having been duly given as required by la~~ and in accordance wlth the
provisions of the Anaheir:i ~lunicipal Code, Chapter i".03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use pernit and to investigate and
nake findings and recommendations in connection there~•~ith; a~d
WNEREAS, said Conmission, after clue inspection, investigation and study rade
bY itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evtdence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and deternir.e the follo~-ring facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for ~•~htch a conditional us~
Permit is authoriYecalre centermin"the'RS? or+~c ~cctio~, i',2t;,%)~~,~?n to wit: to
permit a child da 7..,, (Residential, Single-Fam~~y) 7one.
2. That t)ie proposed use is hereby denie~! on the hasts that vehicul<~r
access is solelythrough a residential alley and the prooosed commercial use would,
thereforc, have a detrimental effect on the surrnundinq residential area; and on the
basis that Harbor Bouievard is a high traffic volume street ~-ihich is potentially
dangerous to child day-care activities.
3, That t,ie proposed use ~~ill adverscly affect the adjoining land uses and
the growth and development of the area in a~hich it is pronose~l to be located.
4. That the size and shape of rhe site pronoserl for the use is not
a~e9~~te to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the part.cular area nor to the neacr, health, Safety, and general
welfare of rhe Citizens of the City of Anahetm,
5, That the grantin~ of the Conrliti~nil Use Permit will b~ detrimental ~o
the peace, health~ safety and general i~ielfare of thc Citizens ~f thc City of .4naheim,
5 That the Lraffic
burden u on the stre 9enerated hy thP pr~~osP~ use will imoos~ an undue
P ets and hig!i~iays deslgned a~~d 'mproved t~ carr
the area. Y the traffic in
PC80-~~a
7. That approximaCely ilF persons indicated ~heir presence at said publjc
hearing in opposition; and that petitions r_ontaining approxinately 10~ signatures
H~ere received in opposition to the suhject petition.
E~VIRO~!~1ENTl1L IMPPtCi FI~lDltlr,; That the Anaheim City Planning Cor~mission has
revieo-~ed the proposal to permit a chil~l day-care center in the I,;-72M r?,
Single-Family) Zone on a rectan,ularl ~•esidential,
9 y-shaoeJ parcel ~f land eonsisting of
approximately ~,23 acres fiaving a frontaoe of appror.imately 1'~3 feet on the rrest side
of Harbor Boulevard, having a maximum depth of ap~roximately 9~ feet and being
located approximately 150 feet north of the centerlinc of Whilhelmina StraAt and does
hereby approve the Plegative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an
environmental tm~~act report on the basis that there t•~o~ld be no significant
individual nr c~mulatiue adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this
Negative Declaration since the Anahetm ~eneral Plan desinnates the subject property
for lot•rdensity land uses c«r.mensurate arlth the oroposal; that no sensitive
environmental impacts are involved in the prnposal; that the Initial Study su6mttted
by the petitioner indicates ~o sionificant indivtdual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and that the Negative Decl~ration substantiatinq the foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planntng [iep~rtment.
PJO!~1, THEREFORE, QE I7 RESOL.VFD that the Anaheim City P)anning Commission
does hereay deny subject Petition for ConditionaT Use Permit on the hasis of the
aforementioned find9ngs.
THE F~REGOING R[SQLUTIOH is signed and approvr.d by me this ilth day of
August, 1~80,
ATTEST:
L/ ~~
CHAIRftAPt, AMAHEI~1 CITY PLP.t~M Nr ~qr.~~~ISSI~Pt
~LC-~-~G~ oC ~~ n .
SECRCTARY, A~:qIIE M CITY PLqN~l~~Jr, C~~ISSIn~~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
CqU~JTY OF ORAt•1GE ) ss.
C ITY OF AtIAHE Ift )
I, Editf, L. Fiarris, Secretary of the AneSein City Planninq Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoinq resolution ~•ias passed and a~lopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Plan~ing Conmission held on F,ugust 11, 1^?n~ ~y rhe fo1l~w~ing vote
of the memhers thereof:
AYES: Cor4~~ss10~lERS: BARNES, QOUAS, BUSfIORE, FRY, HFRPST, Ki~~r, Tn~q~
NOES : COhf"1155 I OrIERS: PlOI~E
ABSEFIT: C011HISSIOVERS: MON[
!N lllT~lESS 41NEREOF, I have hereunt~ set my hand this llth ~fay of ~unust,
19$0,
n
• "~ v`iar
SECRETARY, AHANFf~t CITY PLA')~IIP1r C~~!~+ISSION
PC30-125