PC 80-141RESOLUTIO~i rin. ~r,;n_~i,~
A RESOLUTI01: OF TF!E A~JAFIEIM CITY PLA~~4JI~Ir, Cnr~;~~SS~~~i
TNAT PETITIO'I Fn^, ~n~I~ITIO~iAL U5F PERMIT Mn, ?1nt gF rRA"ITFO
1!fIERFAS, the Anaheim City Planning Conmissinn did receiv~ a verified
Petition for Conditional !lse Pernit from !dIU_IA"1 R, t,/HITI_~ A~m BARqqRq L, l•!HITLA P.
~. tiox 1~!(•,, Ah~•iahnee, California'^2~•!~, oamers. and PF~R.!1 R~DRInI)E7, istj East La
Palma Avenue, Anaheim, California 92~,n5~ aoent, of c.ertatn real property situated in
the City of Anahetm, County of Oran9e, State of California, rlescrihed as:
Thr_ South ?_27..n feet of the ldest one-half of the Southorest ~uarter
of thc South~•~est Ouarter of the Southeast Ouarter ~f Secti~n 2,
7o~•mship h South, Range 1~ llest, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de
Santa Ana, as shorm on a Map recorderi in Dool: ~1, page 1~ of
Miscellaneous ~iaps, records of Orange County, Califerr,ia, F`!CEPT
therefrom thc interest in th^ West 1~.^ feet thereo` conv~yPd to
the City ~f Anaheim by deeds recorded Julp 1~, 1~51~ in 6ook 2?7?,
pages $82 and G03 of Official Records of said Orange County.
WHfREAS, the City Planning Commtssion did hold a puhlic hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on August 25, 1'1F;~, ~t ~•3n p,n., notic~ of said public
hearing having been duly given as required hy )ao-~ anrl in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim ^+untcipal Code, C!~aoter 14.~13, to hear and consider
evidence for and aqainst said proposed conditional use permit anri tn irvestioate and
make findings and recommendations in conn~ction ther~with; and
4~~NFncnc~ ;~;~~ Ccrris~i,~n, aFter dur. incpP~tion, invr.stiaation and study made
hY itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and repnrts
offered at said hearing, does find and deterMine the foito~:~inn facts:
1. That the proposed use is prnperlv ~ne fc,r ~~~hich a conditional use
permit is aut!iorized by Anaheim ~tunicipal Code Sectinn 1°,l~I~,nS~,n~n to wit: to
permit on-sale beer and wine in an existinn restaurant in the CL (Commerclal,
Limited) Zone.
2. That the proposed use ~•rill not adversely affect the a~iioining lanr~ uses
and the growtb and developmen[ of the area in ~-rhich it is r.mposed to he located.
3. That the size and shape of fhe site preposed f~r the use~ is adequate to
a11o~a the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, saf~ty, and gener~l o-~elFare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim,
ff . That the ~rant i ng of the Cond i t i ona 1 I)se Perni t ~.mrler t`~e cond i t i ons
inposed, if any, ~•~i~~ not he dAtrimentai to the peace, health, safety and oeneral
welfare of the Citiz~ns of the City of Anaheim.
PCBO-141
5. That the traffic generated 6y the proposed use ~•~ill no*_ impose an undue
burden upon the streets and higho-rays dPsigned and impre,ved to carry the traffic in
the arca.
6, That no one indicated their presence at said ~uhlic hearin~ in
opposition; and that no correspondence ~~~as rec~ived in opposition to the subject
petition.
EtIVIP,O~!MENTAL INPACT Flid^I~l~: The Plannina Director or his authorized
re~.resentative has determined that the proposed pra.ject fr~lls r~ithin the definition
of Catego;ical Exem~tions, Class 1, as deFined in Para~raph 2 of the City of Anaheim
Environmental Impact Report Guidelines and is, therefore, cate~orically exempt f rom
the requiremPnt te ~repare an E~R.
N041, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL!'ED that the Ana~~eim City Planning Comnission
does here6y grant suhject Petition for Condition?' Use Permit, uoon thr. folloviing
condttions U~hich are herehy found to t~e a necessary prereou!site to the proposed use
of the subje~t praperty in order to ~reserve the safety and r~eneral o-ielf~re of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That subject property sh,311 tie f~P_VP~ODP[I suhstantially in accordance
wtth plans and specifications on file ~~~iYh the City oF AnihPim marlced Exhihit Nos. 1
and 2.
EE IT FURT!!ER FF.SOC.VFD that the Anahein City Planntna Commission does hereby
find and determine that the adoption of ihi~ Resolution Is exnrPSSly pre~llcated upon
applie.a~t~s com~iiance ~:~ith each and ali ~f the conditions hereinahove sPt forth.
Should any condition or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceahle hy the
final judgment of any court of c~mpetent jvrisdiction, then this ^esolution, anc! any
aprrovals herein contained, shall be deemed null and vci~i.
THE Ff1REG01HG RESOLL)TIOt! is signed and a~prove~i tiy me this 25th day of
August, 198^.
~,~_~~..~.c,l ~' _l ~ ~~,~I,_>-._~
fItAIR'LA~d PRf? TF'iPq4E
~^.''•41!EIM CITY PLAPI~!I~lr, ~pMMISSI~N
ATTEST:
~~ ~ ~z!~
SECRETAf;Y~ ANAIiEIM CITY PLAPJrlINr, (,0~1'115510"I
-2- PC80-1 ~11
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUPlTY OF ORAPIGE ) ss.
CITY OF AtIAhEI"~ )
I, Edith L, tlarris, Secretary of the Anaheim Citv Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution ~•~as oassed and icionted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Pl~nning Conmission helrl on August ?.s, 1'1"~, at 1•30 p,m „ hy the
follot•~ing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COM!11SSIONER~: BhR~lES, BUSNOP,E, ROIMS, FRY, HF2!~ST, ~lN~
P~OES: COMt115S10"IERS: NOtdE
tiBSEt•IT: CQMt11S510!dERS: T(1LRR
IPJ WITNESS WFIE~EOF, I ~iave hereunto set my hanrl this ^5th day of qugust, 19,`~0.
~~.~:' ,~.° .
SECRFT/1P,Y, A'IAHE IN C ITY PL~?I~! I`!G CO`!"' I ~S I OM
-3- PCBu-141