Loading...
PC 80-163oFSOLUTIOt; ."10. PC8~1-1!.3 A P,ESOLl1Tl(1"I OF THE A`lAHEIM CITY PLA~RII~1G C~4NISSION TH;1T PETITIO~! f~? C~NDITIO'1AL USE PERHIT 't^, 2113 BE fRA11TED WHEREAS, the Anaheir Ci[y Planning Corrmission ciid receive a verifted Petition for Co~ditional Use Pernit frrxn ORAIlGE C~L'IITY 4/ATER ~ISTRICT, P. 0, Box ~3~0~ Fountain Vallcy, California, ~27~8, ayner, an~i (1AN C~PP CRIISHI~IG Cl1Rp., 14625 Carmenita Road, Suite 210, ~JorwalL;, Caiifornia 40f~~n~ ~g~.nt, of certain real property siiuated in thc City of Anaheir~, Lounty of Orange, State o` California, described as: PARCEL 5: THOSE P~RTIO!IS OF LOTS ?? A"!C 23 Itl BL~CY. 3/, OF YOP,BA L1~7Dh TR~CT, It! Tf!E CITY OF ANAHEIN, C~II~ITY OF ORA~1r,E, STATE OF CALIFORtlIA~ AS PER. HP.P RECORDED I!1 BQOY. ~ PAGES 17 A!;D 1R OF MISCELLA~JEOUS NAPS, I'J TNE OFFICE OF THE COU"ITY RECORDER OF SAID COUt1TY, DESCRIB~D AS FOLLOt1S: 6E61NMIFIG AT A POIIIT OP! THF EqST LINE OF SAID LOT 22, SAID LIrIE BEI~!G Cn;aSIDFpED FOp THIS DESCRIPTIO.'! AS THE CEMTER LINE OF THAT CERTAI~! UtiNAMEO STREET, SHOWPJ OP! T4E EAST S I ~E OF SA I D LQT 22, ' COM~I~N~Y KN~WN AS FEE ANl1 STREET'~ SOl!TH 0° 12' 25" EAST 2~b,4p FEET FROM TF!E F104TNEAST COR~IER OF LOT 22. SAID POINT AL50 BEING TFIE 'lORTHEAST C~RtlEF OF THE LAtiL DESCRiBE6 iN DEED RECORDED DECEMI3E° 3, 1~37, IN BOOK 91G PA(;E 221 OF OFFICIAL RECOR~S; TNENCE SOUTH 0° 12' 25" EAST 57,~'1 FEET TG 1! POI~JT I~J THE NORTH TOE OF THE MORTH D11;E OF THE SANTA AflA RIVER; T4ENCE SOUTH 51° 50' 20" WEST 97;.11 FEET AL~NG SAID ~lQRTH 70E TO THE CE~iTER LI~IC OF A STREET CO~1rtn~~LY KNOWN AS RtCHFIELD ROAD; Tf!EP!CE ~JORTH !1° ~7' 1(1" WEST FS;,~( FEET ALONG SAID CENTER IINE OF RICNFIELD R~AD TO A POIMT S~UTH 0° 07' 10" EAST 284.?~ FEET FROM THE NORTH LIN~ OF SAID LOT 2?; TtIE~lCE NORTH o~° 4f' ~5" EAST 7F6,3~ FEET TO THE P01!IT OF BEGINNI!1G. WFIERFAS, the City Planning Comnission did hold a public hearlnq at the Civic Center in the Ci[y of Anaheim on September 22, 5980, at 1:30 o.n „ notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law anci in accordance ~vith the provisions of the Anaheim 1lunicipal Code, Chapter 19,03. to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use ~ermit and to investigate and make findings and recom^~enda[ions in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission~ after du~ inspec[ton, investigation and study made by itself ar,d in Its behaif~ and after due consideration of a11 evidence and reports offered at sald hearinS, does find and determine [he folinwing facts: 1. That the proposed use is properly one for ~ahich a conditional use per~nit is authorized by Anaheim Flunicipal Code Section 1~.?.1.~50,3?-~ to wit: to permit a concrete and asphalt recyclin9 operation in the RS-A-~~3,00(1(SC) (Residential/Agricultur~l - Scentc CorrTdor ~verlay) Zone. 2. That the nroposed usc is 9ranted for a period of ta+o (7) years, subiect to rPVie~~ for possil~le exlensions of tim~, PC~SO-1G3 ~ 3. That the proposed use wIi) not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and th~ gro~•rth and developraent of the area in which it is proposed to be located. 4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to ; allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particu)ar area nor to the peace, health, safety, and General lti~elfare of the Citizens I of the Ctty of Anaheim. ; S. That the granting of the Conditlonal Use Permtt under the conditlons imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the oeace, health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of tlie City of Anaheim. ~. That the traffic generated by the proposed use 4~111 not impose an undue burden uFon the streets and highways designed and impr~ved to carry the traffic in the ar•ea. 7. That no one indicated their presence at said p~blic hearing in ~PP~sition; and that no correspondence was received in opposi;:ion to the subject petition. EMVlRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Nnahetm City Plannino Commissi~n has reviewed the proposal to permit a concrete and asphalt recycling operation in the RS-A-43,OOQ(SC) (Restdential/Agriculturai - Scenic Corrid~r Overlay) 7one on an irregu)arly-shaped parcel of land consisting of a~proximately !,0 acres, having a fror.tage of approximately 650 feet on the east stde of Richfteld Road, having a maximum depth of approximately 740 feet and being located approximately 1280 feet south of the centerline of La Palma Avenue; and does here.by approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there ~~ould be no significant individual or cumulative adverse envlronmental impact due ~o the approval of this Plegative Declaratton since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property f~r general industrial land uses cortxnensurate with the proposat; that no sensitive environmental imoacts ar~ iR.~~)y~~ in the proposai; that the ;nit~ai Study submftted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumu)ative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department. N04/, THEREFOftE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City P)anntng Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Condittonal UsP Permit, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general ~velfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That the owner(s) of subject proryerty shall pav the traffic signal assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3~396) in an amount as determined by the City Council, for industrial buildings prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. That trash storaye areas shall be provided in accordance ~•~ith aoproved plans on file with the Office of the Executive Directe~r of Pubiic Idorks. 3. That the owner(si of suhject property shall suhmtt a letter requesting the termination o` Conaitional Use Permit No, 67S to the P)anning Department. -z- Pc8o -tF3 4. That subject property shall be developed suhstantially in accordance with plans and speci`ications on filP ~•~ith the City of Anaheim marked Fxhihit No. 1 5, That Condition !!o. 3, ahove-mr,ntioned, shall be complied with prior to the commencement of the activity authorized ur.dar this rPSOlution, or prior to the time that the building permit is issued, er ~~ithin a period of one year from date hereof, whichever uccurs first, or such further time as the PTanning Commission may grant. 6. That Condition tlos. 2 and 1E, ahove-menttoned, shall he complied with prior t~ final building and zoning inspections. 7, That the proposed use is granted for a period of t~~~o (2) years, subject to review for possible extensions of time. BE tT FURTHER RESOLVFD that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predtcated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, er any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approval~ herein contained, shall he deemed null and void. THE FOREG~ING RESOLUTIOW is signed and a~pr~vP~ by me this 7_2nd day of September, 1930. v CHA °MP"! ~ AtJAHE M C I TY PLANN I Nf, C~MM I SS I'?N ATTEST: ~ ~ ,~~OC/v~-~w. SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANMIMG C(1MNISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUMTY OF ORA~lGE ) ss. CITY OF AWAHEIM ) I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution ~~as passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on September 22~ iQ$0, by the following vote of the memhers thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOIIAS~ BUSHORE, FRY, IIERBST, ~IMG, TnLAR NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BAR"IES IN WiTNESS h~FiEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27nc1 day of September, 1980. ~~ oZ , C~r"`~~'~.c.~, SECRETARY, AMAHEIM CITY PLANh11rIG COMMISSION -3- PC8o-t63