PC 80-188 RESOLUTI0~1 PlO. PCIIo-~~3
A RESOLUTIOM OF TrIE APJANEIPt CITY PL/1P1P1111G CQHt115510M
THFlT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATIOh! N0, ~0-31-1F, BE DEt•JIFD
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission di~1 receive a verified
petition for Recl~ssification from CROWPJ DEV[LOPMEtdT CONPANY, 12570 E3 rookhurst
Street, Suite 5, Garden Grove, Cal iforriia 92.61~0, oi•mer of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, desc ribed as
follows:
TFIAT PORTIOPJ OF LQTS g AND 10 OF THE ORANGEWOOD TRACT, AS SHOWtJ OM
A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7, PAGE 42 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS
OF ORANGE COUIJTY, CALIFORNlA, DESCRIBED AS FQLLOWS: BE(;IMNIN~ AT
THE SOUTHtJEST CORhJER OF LOT 1 F3 OF TFACT PIO. 2683, AS S'rIOWtJ OPd A
MAP RECORDED IN BOOY, 92, PAG[ 1~ ADJD 11 OF SAID P1ISCELLANEOUS
F1APS; TFIENCE, ALONG TFIE SOUTHERLY LIPlE OF S.41D TR/1CT N0. 2683,
SOUTH 8£3 DEGREES ~E1' 43" EAST 610.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
WESTERLY LIIJE OF LOT 12 OF TRACT N0. 5155. AS SHOIJ~I ON A MAP
RECORDED IPJ BOOK 1~34, PAGES 45 AP1D 46 OF SAID MISCELLANEOIIS MAPS,
SAID POINT ALSO BEING TH~ SOUThEP.ST COR~lER OF LQT 1~ OF SAID TRACT
N0. 2683; THENC[, ALONG THE 41ESTERLY LINE OF SAID TP,ACT PIO. 5155,
SOUTH 0 DEGREES 00' 05" 4/EST 94,72 ~EET TO THE SOUTH4IEST COR~IER OF
LOT 13 OF SAID TRACT N0. 5155; THEPlCE, ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
SAID TRACT N0. 5155, SOUTH 88 DEGREES 41~ ~E3" EAST 165.22 FEET TO
7HE EASTERLY LI~lE OF THE LAND QESCRIBED IN DF.ED TO GLENN E.
HUGNES, AND OTHERS, RECORDED NOVEMEER 20, 1Q53, IN BOOK 2(17, PAGE
417 OF OFFICAL RECORDS OF SAID OR~VGE COUNTY: TNEPICE, ALOPlG SAID
EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LAND OF HUGHES, SOUTH 00 DEGP,EES 00' 05'~
WEST 190.04 FEET TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITfi AND NORTHERLY
3~.00 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SIMMOPIS AVENUE, AS SHOWN OM SAID
TPACI NQ. 2GE3; THE~iCE, ALONG SfyID PARALLEL LItdE, iJORTH s" DEGREES
41' 43" WEST 543.36 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THF ~AND
DESCRIBED IN DEED TQ VERL UNDER4100D AND WIFE, REC~RDED FEBRIIARY
18~ 1~52 IN BOOK 2283, PAGE 173 OF SAID OFFICIA! RECORDS; THENCE,
ALONG SA I D EASTERLY L I PJE OF UNDER4100D, NORTH 0 DC(;P,EES f10' 05"
EAST 186.75 FEET TO THE SOUTH[AST CORNER OF THE L.Arln DESi,RIBED IPJ
DEED TO HAROL~ J. NEMNAUSER A~~O WIFE, RECORDED OCTOE3ER 22, 1Q52 IN
BOOK 2401, PAGE 162 Of SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS; THEPICE, ALQh1G THE
SOUTHERIY LIPIE OF SAID LAND OF HEMHAUSER, lJORTH 8$ DEGRE~S 41' 43"
WEST 232.11 FEET TO A LINE THAT BEFlRS SOUTH 00 DEGP,EES O(l' Q5"
WEST FROM THE POIP~T OF BEGI~JNING; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 00~ 05"
EAST 9~.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINPJItdG.
YIHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a puhlic hearing at the Civic
Center i n the City of Anaheim on Novemher 3, 1980, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by larf and in accordance with the
provisio ns of th~; Anaheim Municipai Code, Chapter 1£3,03, to hear and consider
evidence fior and against said proposed reclassificatio~ ancl to investigate and make
fi~.:ings and recommendations in c~nnectio~ ttierewith; and
PCBo-18S
.--, ..-.
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its hehalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the folloi,iing facts:
1, That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject ~roperty from
the RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural) Zone to the P,!1-3~~0 (Residential,
Multiple-Family) Zone,
2, That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for low-
density residential land uses.
3. That the requested reclassification of subject property is hereby
denied on the hasis that an increase in density ~-~ould create ac~ditional traffic and
that the reclassification exceeds the density designation of the General Plan.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is not necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses iocaliy established in close
proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally
established throughout the community.
6. That approximately 20 persons indicated their presence at said public
hearing in opposition; and that a petition containing approxtmately 145 signatures
was received in opposition to the subject petition,
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDINC: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviei~aed the proposal to reclassify suhject property from the RS-A-43,000
(Residential/Agricultural) Zone to the RM-3~~0 (Residential, Muitiple-F'amily) Zone to
permit a 1-lot, 60-unit condominium complex (48~ affordable) with waivers of minimum
lot area per dwelling unit, maximum structural height, minimum recreational-leisure
area and minimum number of parking spaces on ar irregularly-shaped parcel of land
consisting of approximately 3.7 acres located north and east of the northeast corner
of Simmons Avenue and Haster Street; having approximate frontaqes of 543 feet on the
north side of Simmons Avenue and g$ feet on the east side of Haster Street, being
located approximately 218 feet north of the centerline of Simmons Avenue and
approximately 282 feet east of the centerline of Haster Street; and does hereby
disapprove the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental
impact report on the basis that there would be significant indlvidual or cumulative
adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaretion since
the Anaheim General Plan designates the suhject property for loar density land uses
not commensurste with the proposal; that sensitive envtronmental impacts are involved
in the proposal; and that the Initial Study submitted by the petittoner indicates
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does here5y deny subject Petition for Reclassification on the basis of the foregoing
findings.
THE FOREGOIWG RESOLUTIQ~I is signed and approve<1 by me this 3rd day of
November, i~C~O.
ATTEST:
~ v•
CHAIRMAN, AMAhIEIM CITY LA~IMIN~ 01MISS10~1
~,~ L~~ .~ • /`K-fl~Lt.w
SECRETARY~ ANANEIM CITY PLAP!NING COMMISSIOfI
-2-
PC~30-188
i'. -_
STATE OF CALIFORPJIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF A~~AHE~M )
I, Edith L. Harris~ Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution v~as passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November 3, 1~J~, by the folloo-~ing vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSlONERS: DARNES, BOUAS, FRY, f(E^RST, KIPIG, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSfONERS: DUSHORE
ABSEPJT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of PJovember,
1980.
SECRETARY, APJAHEIM CITY PLANr•IING COMMISSION
~~~ PC30-18$