PC 80-19RESOLUTIOtI P10, PC30-1Q
A RESOLUTIOF! OF TfIF /1hlA11EIt1 CI'fY PLANFtIfdG C011111SS10!f
Ttl/1T P[TITION FOR COf,DiTIONAL USE PEP,?11T hJO. 7.01!~ BE DEtIIEJ
Petition folrRCo~nditlonalAUseePermittfrcm,A1ERICA?IrPJATIOPdALnPFOPERTI[Se1V~~J~a'veFifi~ed
Box 10077, Santa Ana, Caltfornia, g?.711, owner, and f,qCIFIC OUTDOOR C,DVER7ISING CO.,
P• ~• Box 315f3, Los Angeles, Cali`ornia 90051, agent, of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
Parcel 3, in the City of Anaheim, as per Map Recorded in E3ook 32,
Page 50 of Parcel Maps, in the Office of the Ceunty Recorder of
said County.
l•JHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on January 2u, 1gII0, at 1:3~ p.m., nc~tice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by la~~ and in accordance with the
provisi~ns of the Anaheim ~1unicipai Code, Chapter 12.03, to hear and consi~er
evidence for and against said proposed conditionzl use permft and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection thereo-iitii; and
41HEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said ;~earing, does fi~d and determine the fol)a~•aing facts:
1. That the proposed use is pro~erly one for ~~~hich a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Mu~icipal Cod~ Sectio~ 1~?,<<,nrn.^,°p ~o wit: to
retain an existing biliboard in the P1L (Industrial; Limited) 2one ~oith waiver of the
following:
{a) SECTIO~J 18.05.116.01~ - Maximun heigtt.
(3F feet perrt•itted;
+~~t existin9)
(b) SECTIO(J 18.05.115 - Minimum setback.
,5~ et required in the ~IL Zone;
~$- eet existing)
2. That the proposed use is herehy denied on the basis that subject
property anu the surrounding area o-rere undeveloped ~ahen thls t>illboard 4ras originally
constructed; ho~~ever, industrial development is currently under way on subject
property and the existing sign ~vould be detrimental to the industrial use of subject
property and surrounding area.
3. That the reques[ed ~~aivers are hereby denied on the basis that tfie use
has been denied; that there are no unique circumstances applicable to the property,
including size, shape, top~graphy, location or surroundings, which do not apply to
Pf,30-?a
other proper•ty under identical zoning ciassification in the vicinity; and that the
Zoning Code hos been amended since this billhoard was originally approved resulting
in the billboard being in a nonconforming location.
4. That the biliboard shall be removed ~•~ithin sixty (50) days from the
date herefn.
5. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and
the growth and development of ;.i~e area in which it is proposed to be located.
E. That the size and shape of the s~te proposed for the use is not
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, s.fety, and general
v+elfare of the Citizens of the City of A~aheim.
7. That the granting of the Conditicnal Use Permit t•~ill 6e detrimental to
the peace, health, safety and general o-~elfarc of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
8. That ttie t~-affic generated by the proposed use wiil not impose an undue
burden upon the streets anci nigh~•~ays designed and improved to carry ttie traffic tn
the area.
9. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
EPJVIROPIME~lTFlI_ I`1PkCT FIPlDItJG: Tne Planning Director or his authartzed
representative has determined that the proposed project falis !•~ithin the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 3, as deflned in Para~raph 2 of the City of Ana!zet~;;
i:nvironmentai impact Report Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirenent to prepare an EIR.
P:OW, THEREFORF, f3E IT RESQLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Lommission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit on the basis of the
aforementioned findin9s.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOH is signed and approved by me this 23th day of
January, i98~,
ATTEST•
1~.~, ~ ,f ~
CHA I RMAPI, AP!l1fIE I h1 C I TY PLANtI I P1G COHM I SS I Oh
iJ w`-~~ ~v.d(JL^ c ai
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COM+IISSION
-7.- PC~4Q-1 ~
,~-•.
STATE OF CALIFORidIA )
COUPITY OF OR,4`!G[ ) ss.
CITY OF /1NAHEIFI )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Ca~nmission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on January ?.8, 19R~, by the follo~,ring vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: CQMMISSIO~lERS: EARNES, f3US~!OZF, FRY, HERBST, KIN~, TOLAR
t~0E5: CONM1SSlONERS: ~IOME
ABSEPIT: COMMISSIONERS: DAVID
198n.
IPd 4JITPlESS 41HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2~3th day of January,
C~ ~i.(~i'.a. ~ /~~
SECRETAF;Y, ANFNE I ~! ClTY PLANN I P!G COIi~11 SS I ON
-3- PC9~-1q