PC 80-198~~'r' .
RESOLUTION N0. PC30-198
A RESOLUTION OF THE ArlAHEIM CITY PLANNING COHMISSIOti
THAT PETITION FOR COIJDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2132 BE GRAMTED
WHEREAS~ the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit frum GLENDON R. MILLER A~ID SHIRLEY G. MILLER,
2121 Skyline, Fullerton, Cattfornia, 92631, owners, and GEORGE blADE, 6074 Camino
Manzano~ Anaheim, Lalifornia 92807, agent, of certain real property situa;ed in the
City of Anahetm, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
Lot Eight of Eucalyptus Forest Tract in the Lity of Anaheim~ as
shown on a map thereof. recorded in Book 5~ pages 29 and 30,
Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Cortmission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anahetm on November 17, lg£30~ at 1:30 P.m., notice of said
public hearFng havtng been duly given as required by 1aw and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipa) Code, Chapter 18.03~ to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditiona) use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS~ said Commission~ after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf~ and after due consideration of ali evtdence and reports
offered at said hearing~ does find and determtne the followinq facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditio~a) ~se
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.600.601 to wit: to
permit a truck repair facitity.
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted on the basis that all vehiclps
being repaired shall be parked on-site and inside the enclosed area and that no
vehtcles shall be parked on the street, as stipu~ated to by the petitioner,
3. That the proposed use is granted for a period of two (2) years, subJect
to review for possi6le extenstons of time.
4. That the proposed use ioill not adversely affect the adjoining land us~s
and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
5. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimentai to the
particular area nor to the peace, health~ safety~ and general rielfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
6, That the granting of the Condittonal Use Permit under the conditions
imposed~ if any~ will not be detrimental to the peace~ health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Ananeim.
PC8o-t98
7. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and high4rays designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
8. That no one indicated thelr presence dt said publtc hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was recei~ed in opposition to the subJect
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINOiNG: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
revTewed the proposal to permit a truck repaTr facility in the ML (,~ndustrial,
Limited) 2o~e on a rectangularly-shaped parcei of land consisting of apRroximatelv
0,86 acre~ having a frontage of approximately 132 feet on the south side of Miraloma
Avenue, having a maximum depth of agproximately 285 feet and being located
approxiroately 265 feet east of the centeriine of Blue Gum Strzet; and does hereby
approve the P~egative Deciaration from the requirement r~ prepare an enviranmental
Impact report on the basis that there would be ne stgnificant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due to 2he approval of this Negative
Declaratio~ since the Anaheim General Plan desi~nates the subject property for
general industrial land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensttive
environmenial impacts are Pnvolved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted
by the petitioner indtcates no significant individual r,r cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaratton substantiattng the foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLUED that the Anaheim City Plznning Commisston
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the followina
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Cltizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That street lighting facllities along Mtraloma Avenue shall be
Instatied as required by the Office of Utifities General Manager, and in accordance
with standard spectfications on file in the Office of the Utilities General Manager.
2. That trash storage areas with paved access shall be provided in
accordance with approved plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of
Public Works.
3. Thati the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the t~affic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3396) in an amount as determined by the City Council~
for industrial buildings prior to the issuance of a bui~ding permit.
4. That subJeCt property shall be enclosed on all sides by a 6-foat high
concrete masonry wall or chainlink fence interwoven with either redwood or cedar
slats.
5. That all outdoor yard areas (with the exception of paved access to the
trash enclosure) shall be oiled and graveled with decomposed granits.
6, That subject property shait be developed substantially in accordance
wlth plans and specifications on file vrith ihe City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. t;
provided, however~ that the driveways shall be a mtnimum thlrty (30) feet tn width,
-2- Pc8~-t98
7. That ondition Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6~ above-mentioned, shall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspectians.
8. That all vehicles being repaired shall be parked on-site and inside an
enclosed area.
9. That the use is granted for a period of two (2) years, subJect to
review for possible extensions of time by the Planning Commisslon. Such review shall
be requested in writing by the petitioner.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEO that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that the adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's comptiance wlth each and all of the condtttons hereinabove set forth.
Should any condition or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the
final judgment of any court of competent jurfsdiction~ then this ResolutTon, and any
ap~rovals herein con2ained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOtN6 RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 17th day of
November~ 1980.
,
.y ~r~.~ r . ~ ~-o-l-s~--
CHAIRMAN PRO TEMPORE
A~lAHE1M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
_ ~~ ~ ~,~,..~y
SECRETFiRY~ RNAHEfhf CfTY PLANNING COM-11SSIOM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~, Edith L. Harris~ Secretary of the Anahelm City Pianning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meetTng of
the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission held on November 17, 1g80, at 1:30 p.m.~by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARMES, 90UAS~ BUSHORE, KING
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FRY~ HERBST, TOLAR
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of November, i98o.
wn ,~ ~
SECRE~ARY, r1AH~ I'FY PLANN I NG COMM 1 SS I O~i
-3- PC8o-198