PC 80-202RESOLUTIO~~ N0. PC80-2U~
A RESOLUTIOD~ OF THE At1AHEIPI CITY ~LANNI~JG COHNISSIO~!
THAT PETITIOP! FOR COpIDITI0FIAL USE PERMIT ?!0. 213F BE DEPJIED
WHEREAS, the P.naheim City Planning Commtssion did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permtt from JOHP! AZIAIAPJ APlD DEANNE AZ17.IAN, 6331
Innsdale Drive, Hollywood~ Callfornia, g0068, o~mers, and MFLVENA A. TRENHOLM~ P, p,
Box 2421-H, Anaheim, California 92804, agent of certain real property situated in t!~e
C~ty of Anaheirr, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
PARCEL 1: THE NORTH 70 FEET OF THE SOUTH 140,00 FEET OF TFIE EAST
390,82 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF SECTION 18, IN TOWPlSHiP 4 SOUTH,
RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS SAID
SECTION IS SNOWtd ON A MAP TlIEREOF RECORDED IM BOOK ;1, PAr,E 10 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS
FOLL04/S: BEGINNiflG AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTIOPJ
t8~ NORTH 50.00 CHAINS FROM THE SOUTHEAST CbRNER OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE WEST 8.77 CHAiNS; THENCE MORTH 11,41 CHAItJS; THENCE EAST
$.77 CNAItJS; THENCE SOUTH 11,41 CHAINS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNIPJG.
41HEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public heartng at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on November 17, 1q$p, at 1:30 p,m,~ notice of said public
heartng having been duly given as required by )aw and in accordance wlth the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal ~ode, Chapter 18,03, to hear and consider
evidence for and agatnst satd proposed condttional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAg, sa(d Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
bY itself and in tts behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reoorts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the foilowing facts:
1. That the proposed use 1s properly one for which a condttional use
permit is authorized by P.naheim Municipa) Code Section 18,8A,030,p~~ to wit: to
retaln a massage parior with waiver of:
SECTIOPJ 18.89,030.020.13 - Minimum distance frcxn a church.
1000 eet required;
~eet existing)
2. That the proposed use and requested waiver are hereby denied on the
basis that pursuant to Anaheim Munici;~al Code Section 1~3,a9.03p,~2p~ no conditional
use permit shall be granted by the City of Anaheim for any adult ente~tatnment
business if the premises upon whlch such business is located is within 1000 feet of a
church or school site or within 50~ feet of a residentially zoned lot. The subject
use is defined as an adult entertainment business by the Anahetm Nunicipal Code and
the premises are located approximately 460 feet north of a church and school site and
less than 33~ feet from residentfally zoned lots to the ~vest.
3. That the proposed us~ !~~ii; adversely affect the adJoining land uses and
the graoth and development of the area tn ~rhlrh it fs proposed to be located.
PC80-202
~~. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and generai
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim,
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit will be detrimental to
the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the Citlzens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
7. That one (1) person indicated their presence at said public heartng in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petttlon.
ENUIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Director or his authorized
representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of Anaheim
Environmental Impact Report Guidelines and is, therefore~ categorically exempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFGRE, BE tT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permtt on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 17th day of
November, 1980.
A7TEST:
SECRE AR , N HEIM CITY PLA~dNING COMMI SION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OP ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Comnlssion held on ~~ovember 17~ 1980, by the following vote
of the members thereaf:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BOUAS~ BUSIIORE, KING
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSE~YT: COMMISSIONERS: FRY, HERBST, TOI,AR
IN WITD~ESS WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of November,
tg8o,
' ~ .
~ L N G COMMISSION
~2 PC80-202
~~
~ .~
~ ~~...~ ~t~ ~` _ ~.-~~. --`
GHAIRMAN PRO TEMPORE
P,P:AtfEtM ClTY PLAtJNING COMM(SSION