PC 80-206RESOLUTtOt~ N0. PC$0-206
A RESOLUTION OF TtiE AFiAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
'fHAT PETITION FOP, RECLASSIFICATIOt7 N0. ~36-81-1$ BE GRA~~TED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Canmission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from AtJAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGE~ICY, 106 North Claudina
Street~ Anaheim, Caltfornia 92805, owner of certaTn real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange~ State of California, described as fotloa~s:
The site is Parcel 2 of a subdivision of portions of Blocks "A"
and "B" of the center tract, as per map recorded in Book 14, Page
13 of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, California, and
a portion of the resubdivision of the northerly part of 81ock A of
the center tract, as per map recorded in Bool: e, Page 22 of
Mlscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, together o-~ith a
portion of Claudina Street, vacated by Resolution Plo. 76R-653, of
the City Council of the City of Anaheim, Recorded December 1, tg76
in Book it979, Page 1467 of Official Records, of said Orange
County and portions of the alleys as shown on said maps, vacated
by Resolutlon No. 80R-244 Book 13042 Page 103 of Official Records
of said Orange County.
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the Ctty of Anaheim on November 17, 1980, at 7:00 p.m., notice of said
public hearT~g having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1~',03, to hear and constder
evidence for and agalnst said prop~sed reclassification and to investtgate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewlth; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigatton and study made
by ItselP and in i[s behatf, and after due consideration of alt evidence artd reports
affered at said hearing, does find and determine the foltowtng facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassificatlon of sub.ject property from
the RM-1200 (Residential, Ptuitiple-Family) Zone to the CL (Commercial, Limited) Znne.
2, That the Anaheim General Plan designates subj~ct property for general
commercial land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassiftcation of subject property is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper develop~ent of the conmunity.
4, That the proposed rectassification of subject property does properiy
relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally estahlished in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted u•es ge~erally established
throughout th~ community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the
improvement of a6utting streets in accordance with the Ciru~lation Element of the
General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by
the intensification of land use.
PC8o-2o6
~._---
6. That no one indicated their presence at: sald public hearing in
opposition; and that no corresponder.ce was received in opposition to the subJect
petition.
ENViROPlMENTAL IMPACT FINDIPlG: That the Anaheim City Planning Commisston has
revie~~ed the proposal to reclass y subject pro~erty from the RM-12~Q (Residential~
Multiple-Family) Zone to the CL (Cortmercial, Limited) Zone~ on a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.3 acres iocated at the northwest corner
of Broada~ay and Philadelphia Street, having approximate frontages of 330 feet on the
north side of Broadway and 175 feet on the ~aest side of Philadelphia Street; and does
hereby approve the Negative Declaratian from the requirement to prepare an
environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no significant
individua) or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this
Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property
for general commercial land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive
environmental tmpacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted
by the petitioner indicates no si9nificant individual or cumulat(ve adverse
environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from the RM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE and to incorporate said
described property into the CL (COMMERCIAL, LIMITED) ZONE upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That trash storage areas shall be orovided in accordance with approved
plans on file ~atth the Office of the Executive Director of Public Works.
Z. That sidev~aiks shali be instalied alang Claudina Street as requIred by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and speciftcations on fiie in
the office of the City Engineer.
3. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that the adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any condition or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceabla by the
final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any
approvals hereln contained~ shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 17th day ~~f
November, 1980.
,r~...:-._.. ,~ -~.` ~1~- ' ~j v a 1-.* -'`-~
ATTEST:
ANAHE i M C I TY PLANN I NG COMt•1 I SS I OP!
, '~~ ~ ~
Q.G.Pi6t, ~,~
SECRE17ihY'~ A~1CF~E~1'~i"~'T L NN I PJG COMM I SS I ON -Z- PC80-206
:;~~
--~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ~s,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoin9 resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November 17, 1980, at 1:30 p.m,,by tne
followtng vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BOUAS, BUSHORE, KING
NOES: COMMISSIONcRS: NONE
ABSENT: C011MISSIONERS: FRY, HERBST, TOLAR
IN WITNESS 41HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 17th day of November, 1980.
SECRETARY, APJAHEIM CI~~LANNIM~~ISSION
-3- PCao-206