PC 80-21~:..
RESOLUTION N0. PC80-21
A RESOLUT I ON OF THE AHAHE I M C I TY PLAhIh: I FIG CONFt l SS I ON
THAT PETITION FOR COPIDITIOPI~IL USE PFRMIT N0. 2f15~~ BE GRA~lTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Com,Tission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional tJse Permit from RAD1/1tJT TECHNOLOGY CORPORATIOPI. t3856
Bettencourt Street, Cerritos, California, 90701, oo-mer, and VA~DERSON COPlSTRUCTION,
I(dC., 1345 Var.~ier Way, San Jose, California 95112, agent, of certain reat property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
PARCEL 1: That portion of Lot 2 in Block K of the Kraemer Tract,
in the County of Orange, State of ~alifornia~ as per :rap recorded
in book 12, pages 37 and 83~ Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles
County, California~ described as follo~•is: Beginn+ng at a point in
the Westerly line of said Lot 2; said point being Southerly Q90.00
feet from the NorthH!est corncr of said Lot 2, said point being the
t~orthwest corner of the tand desFrlbed as P~~CeI 3 in deed to John
F. Anderson and other, recorded December 21, 1?50 in book 2119,
page 201, Officiai Records; thence Easterly along the Northerly
line of last mentioned land 330.00 feet to the tlorth~aest corner of
the land described as Parcel 1 in deed to Paul J. McGhehey ar~d
wife. recorded July 14, 1959 in book 47g7, pa~e 1+3i, Official
Records; thence Southerly along the Wes;eriy line of said last
mentioned deed 126.20 feet to the tJor~~east corner of the land
described as Parcel 2 1n said last mentioned deed to McGhehey;
thence Westerly along the IJortherly line of said Parcel 2, a
distance of 25.00 feet to the Fiorthwest corner of said Farcei Z;
thence Southerly alony the Westerly line of said Parcet 2, 16.OG
fect to the Southwest corner of said Parcel 2; thence Easterly
along the Southerly line of said Parcel 2. a distance 25.00 feet
to the Westerly line of said Parcel 1 in said last mentioned deed
to McGhehey; thence Southerly along said Westeriy tine of [he land
described as Parcel 1 to 11cGhehey, and its Southerly proiongation
to a point in the Northerly line of the land described in deed to
Calvin t4. Seay and wife, recorded June 17. 1960 in book 5~91, page
328, Official Records; thence Westerly along the I~ortherly line
of said last mentioned land to the ~+orthwest corner of said land;
thence Southarly along tne Westerly line of said land of Seay~
160.00 feet to the Southwest cornr_r of said land; thence 4/esterly
along the 1Jesterly prolnngation oT the Southerly line of sald land
of Seay to said West line of Lot 2; thence Plortherly along said
Westerly line of Lot 2. a distance of 5~~3.00 feet to the point of
beginning; and
PARCEL 2: A 30 foot right: of way for road purposes to be used in
common with others along the Southerly line ~f the following
property: 1he Northerty rectangular 37~3 feet of the following:
that portion of Lot 2 in Block K of the Kraemer 'fract, as shown on
a map recorded in b~ok 12, pages 87 and 8°, Miscellaneous Records
of Los Angeles County. California, described as: Beginning at a
PC30-21
point distant 3~.10 rods 1Jesterly me~sured at right angles from a
point in the Easterly line of said lot, said latter polnt being 7~
rods Southerly from the Plortheasterly corner of said lot; thence
Southerly, parallel with the Easterly line of said lot, 42 rods;
thence Westerly parallel o~ith the Hortherly line of said lot,
4t.9o rods t~ a point in the Westerly line of said lot; thence
Flortherly, along said Westerly tine, 42 rods; thence Easterly,
parallei with the Northerly line of satd Lot, ~!1.p0 rods to the
point of beginning. EXCEPTIPlG THEREFROH any portion thereof lying
~•+ithin Parcel 1.
WHEREAS, the City P1-nning Commission did hold a public tiearing at the City
Hall in [he City uf Anaheim on January 28, 198~, at 1:3~ p.m., notice of said public
hearing havtng been duly given as required by lao-i and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Munic~pal Code, Chapter 1P.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREA~, said Cortmiss3on, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its beh~lf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed ~se is properly one for t•~hich a condltional :ise
permit Is authorized by AnaFeim ~Iunicipal Code Sections lA.G3.o3o.010 and
18.61.05~.503 to wit: to permit a truck freight terminal with waivers of:
(a) SECTIOP! 1a.01.130 - Re uired lot fronta e.
Fronta e on dedicated stree* oi ~ile~ requtred;
none proposed
(b) SECTIOF! 18.61.068.Q3~ - Required enclosure of outdo~r uces.
- oot high chainlink encing intc~rwoven ~•rith
wooden slats proposed to screen t-•ucks exceeding
6 feet in height)
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted subject to the petitioner's
stipulation at the public hearing that no ninety (90! fooe long trailer truzks shall
uttlize the proposeJ freight terminal.
3. That the requested waiver (a) is hereby granted on the basis that the
petitione~ submitted information showing this landlocked parcel of proper*.y has a 30-
foot wide easement for access purposes.
4. That the req~ested waiver (b) is hereby granted because the outdoor
storage ~~ill consist solely of parked trucks; an~i subject to the peitioner's
stipulatlons at the public hearing to removing the existing gates across the access
easement and helptng the adjacent property owner to the east construct adequate site
screentng along the entire access easement, said screening consisting of a six-foot
high chainlink fence inten;~oven with redwood slats; and also to resurfactng the
entire access easement to provide a suitable surface for the proposed truck t~affic,
5. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be lor_ated.
-2- PC8Q-21
'~
~. That the size and shape of the site proposed fo~ the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposad use in a manner not detrimental to
partlcular area nor to tlie peace, health, safety, and general t:~elfare of the Citizens
of the Ctty oF Anaheim.
7. That the granting of the Conditic.nai Use Permft under the conditions
welfare~offtheYCitizens~ofbtheeCityeofaAnaheime Pcace, health, safety and general
8• That the traffic generated by the proposed use ~•rill not tmpose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved *_o carry the traffic in
the area.
9• That two percons indicated their presence at said public hearing in
oppos(tion; and that no correspondence ti•ras received in opposition to the subjecr
petition.
ENVIRONHENTAL IMPQCT FINDIFif: That the Anahein City Planning Commission has
revier~ed the proposal to permit a truck freight terminal with o-iaivers of
frontage and required enclosure of outdoor uses on a rectangularly-sha ed9uired lot
land cunsisting of approximately 4,~8 acres located approximatel P Parcei of
the centerline of Mt11er Street; and does here~ a Y 33~ feet west ~f
fram the requirement to prepare an environmental tmpactPr~eporte on9attve Declaration
Chere wou)d be no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmentalsimpact
due to the approval of this Negatlve Declaration since the Anahetm General Plan
designates the subject property for general (ndustrial land uses commensurate with
the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal;
that the Inttlal Study submitted by the petitloner tndlcates no signifieant
individual or cumu)ative adverse environnentai impacts; and that the Negattve
Declaration substantlating the foregoing findings Is on file in the C~ty of Anaheim
Planning Department.
NQW, THEREFORE, BE IT RLSOLVED that the Anahetm City Plan;iing Commission
does hereby grant subject P.=tition for Conditional Use Permit, upc,;~ the following
ccnditions whlch are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in urder to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Ctttzens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That appropriate a~atPr assessment fees as dete~m(ncd by the Office of
Uttlities General Flanager shal) be paid :o the City of Anaheim prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
2. That trash storage arc:as shail be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of Public Works,
3. That fire hydrants s:hall be installed and charged as re:~utred and
determined to be necessary by the Ch+'ef of the Fire Department prior to commencement
of structural framing.
4• That the o~aner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordtnance Wo. 330~) In an amount as determined by the City Council~
for industrtal buildings prior t~ the tssuance of a building permit.
-~- PC$0-21
5. That tlic proposed truck freiaht facili[y shall conply ~~ith all signing
requi,-ements of the ML (InJustr(al, Limited) Zone.
6. That subject property shall be deve'loped subs~antiall• in accordance
Ntth plans and specifications on file ~~~ith the City of Anahetn marked Exhibit Plos. 1
th-ough S.
7. That Che existing gates across the access easement to the east sh~ll be
removed and site scree~ing consisting of a six-foot high chainlink fence interwoven
with redwood slats, shall be constructed along the entire access easement.
8. That the entire access easement shall be resurfaced to provide a
suitabie surface for the proposed truck traffic.
9. That Conditlon t~os. 2, 6 and 7, above nentiuned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspecttons.
i0. That there shall be no ninety (90) foot long trailers utilizing subject
property.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does herebv
find and determine that adoption of th[s Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance a~ith each and all of [he conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition~ or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the flnal judgment of any court of cumpetent jurisdlction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed nuli and void.
TNE FOREGOItJG RESOLUTIOIJ i~ signed and approved by me this 28th day of
January, 1980.
ATTEST•
~ 1~.e~" ~-.~-~_~
CHA I RMAIJ,~AtJAHE I M C ITY PLAHN I PIG COMP11 SS I ON
. / ~ • ~~
SECRETARY, A~lAHE i M C ITY PLAN~! I NG COM"11 SS I 0~!
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHE111 )
I, Edith L. Harris~ Secretary of the Anaheim City Planninq Commission, do
hereby certify that the forcgoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the An~heim City Planning Commission held on January 23, 1~~30, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: ~OPIMISSIO"lERS: BARNES, BUSIIORE~ DA~11D. FRY~ IIERBST, KIPiG. 'fOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: t~011E
ABSENT: C~M!115510tlERS: NONE
IN tJITNESS IJHEREOF, i havc hc~eu~to set my hanJ thfs 2gth day of Sanuary~
198u.
~~C4ET , At HETM CIY LANFlIFlG OMMISSION
-~~- PC80-21