PC 80-213RESOLUTION N0. PC80-213
A RESOLUTION OF THE APIANEIM CITY PLANNiNG COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERPIIT N0. 2117 BE DEPIiED
WHFREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission
petition for Conditional Use Permit from NICHOLAS URSINI
Padonta, Whit~ter, California, 90603, owners, and JOHN H.
Newport Beach, California 92G60, agent, of certatn real prop
of ~Snaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
did receive a verified
ADlD MARY URS I P! I, 1338
DAWSON, 4650 Von Karman,
erty situated in the City
as:
That portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 22, Township lE
South~ Range 10 West, as shown on a map recorded in book 51, page
10 ~f Miscellaneous Maps. records of Orange County, ~~lifornia,
described as foilows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of satd
Southeast quarter; thence North 675.00 feet along the Westline of
said Southeast quarter; thence East 833.51 feet parallel with the
South iine of said Southeast quarter; thence South 0° 16' 30"
East, 675.11 feet to the true point of beginning, said point also
being the Southeasterly corner of the land descrihed in deed to
Alwyn S. Jewell and Lucille G. Jev~ell, recarded October 5, 1959 in
book 4°12, page 102 of Official Records; thence North 0° 16~ 30"
West, 360.00 feet along the Easterly line of said 1and; thence
East 150.00 feet paraliel with the Southerly line of said
Southeast quarter; thence Soutt~ 0° 16' 3~" East, 3~0,00 feet
paral)el with said Easterly line of the land conveyed to Jewell to
the Southerly line of said Section; thence West alonq the
Southerly line of said Section 160.00 feet to the true point of
beginning.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission dtd schedule a public hearing at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on October 6, 1980, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required hy law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 12~03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against sald proposed conditional use pe~mit and to investigate and
make findtngs and recortxnendations in conn~ction therewith; sald public hearTng having
been continued to the Planning Commission meeting of December i, 1980; and
WHEREAS, said Cortrcnission after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behal' and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, uoes find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditiona? use
permit ts authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sectton 18.8g.030.010 and
18.03.~3~.010 to prr•mit an adult entertainment business in cennection with a
backgamnon and chess operatio~.
2. That ti~e proposed use is hereby denied on the basis ~hat pUrsuant to
Anaheim Municipal Cade Section 18.II9.030.020~ no condtttonal use permit shall be
granted by the City of Anaheim for any adult entertalnment bustness if the premises
upon which such business is located is within 1000 feet of a church or schoel site or
Pc8o-zt3
within 500 feet of a residentially zoned lot. The subject premises are located
approximately 310 feet south of an extsting church and school (Melodyland Christian
Center School) and the subject property abuts RS-A-43,n00 (Residentlal/Agricuitural)
Zoned property to the norfh and east.
3. That the proposed use ~~rill adversely affect the adjolning land uses and
the growth and development of the area in which it fs proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the sfte proposed for the use is not
adequate to allow the fu11 development of the propo;ed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Cttizens of the City of Anahetm.
5. That granting of the Cundittunal Use Permit will be detrimental to the
peace~ health~ safety and general welrare of the Citizer.s of the Ctty of Anahetm.
6. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will fmpose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways destgned and improved to carry the traffic in
the arca
7. That 3 persons indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposltion; and that no correspandence was received tn oppositton to the subJect
petition.
ENViRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDIFIf: The Planning Dlrector or his authorized
representat ve as etermine that the proposed project falls ~oithtn the definition
of Categorical Exemptions~ Class 1, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the City of Anaheim
Envtronmental Impact Report Guidelines and is~ therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED that the ~naheim City Plannlna Commission
does hereby deny subject Pet)tiort for Conditionai Use Permft on the basis of the
aforementioned itndings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this lst day of
December, 7980,
ATTEST:
n / ~ ~
SECRETAR , AD~ HEIM i PLANNING COMMISSION
/~.~~~~
~n RMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOW
-2-
PC80-213
~,...~.m...;:,r::.;~.>:~ . . .
~°
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF OFANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L.
hereby certify that the
the Anaheim City Plann
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
Harris, Secretary of tF~e Anaheim City Planning Commission~ do
foregoing resolution ;yas passed and adopted at a meeting of
ing Commission held on December T, 19f30, by the following vote
BARNES, BOUAS~ BUSHORE, FRY, KING, TOLAR
NONE
HERBST
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ist day of December,
1980,
SECRETARY, NAHEIM CITY PLANNIN~ COMMISS ON
-3- PC80-213