PC 80-23~'~~~~:
RESOLUTION N0. PC80-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE NMAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMh11SSI0N
THAT PETITIO~d r=OR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 79-80-?_4 BE GRArJTED.
WHEREAS, the Anahein City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petltion for P,eclassification from LANA CORPORATIOPJ, 2614 East Washington, Escondjdo,
California 92027, owner, and INVESTORS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIOh! OF Okl1NGE COUNTY, 134,
North Grand Avenue, Santa Ana, California 92701, agent, of certatn real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State ef California, described as
follows:
PARCEL 1: That porr.ion of Lot 40 of Anahetm Extension, as shown
on a Map of Survey by William Hamel, December 1863, filed tn the
office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, California, a
copy of which is shown tn book 3, page 163, and following,
entitled "Los Angeles County Maps", in the office of the County
Recorder of Orange County, California, described as follows:
Be9lnning at the Southeast corner of the land descrited in deed to
the Anaheim School Dfstrict of Orange County, recorded January 2h,
~95o in book 1957, page 518, Official Records, beina a potnt on
the Southerly line of the land described in deed to Erwin H. W,
Ke~sten, and wife, recorded June 4, 194f3 in book 1647, page 173,
Official Records, South 74° 41' ~+0" West 3S5•09 feet measured along
said ]ine and its Easteriy prolongation from the monumented center
line of Palm Avenue; thence North 15° 21' 00" 4Jest 215.20 feet
parallel with the center line of North Citron Street along the
Easterly line of said land described in deed to the Anaheim School
~istrict of Orange County to the Northeast corner thereof and the
true point of beginntng; thence South 82° 35' 40" lJest t00.OQ feet
along the Northerly line thereof; thence Nortf~ 15° 21' 00" ;dest
t~ the center line of West La Palma Avenue, as shown on said map
of Anaheim Extension; thence Plorth 89° 39' S0" East along said
center line to the Northerly prolongation of the said Easterly
llne; thence South 15° 21' pp'~ West 108.42 feet along said
prolongation and Easterly line to the true point of beginning; and
PARCEL 2: That portion ~f Lot 40 of Anaheim Extension, as shoHrn
o~ a Map of Survey by Wi113am Hamel, December 1868, filed in the
office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, California, a
~~PY of which is shQwn in book 3, page 163 and following, entitled
"Los Angeles County Maps", in the o`fice of the County Recorder of
Orange County~ Calif~rnia, described as follows: Beginning at the
Southeast corner of the land described in deed to the Anahetm
School Dlstrict of Orange County, recorded January 24, 1950, tn
book ~~57~ page 518 of Official Records being a point on the
Southerly itne of the land described in deed to Erwin H. W
Kersten~ and wife, recorded June 4~ 19G$ in book 1647, page 173 of
Official Records, South 74° G1~ 4p~~ West 3S5,Og feet measured
along sald line and its Easterly prolongation from the monumented
~enter line of Falm Avenue; thence North 15° 2S' 00" West 215.20
feet parallel t,tth the centerline of North Cttron Street along the
PC9~•~23
Easterly line of said land described in deed to the Anaheim School
District of Orange County to the t~ortheast corner thereof; thence
South 82~ 35' 40" West 200.00 feet to the true point of beginning;
thence PJorth 15° 21' 00" West to the center lir.e of West La Paima
Avenue as shown on said map of Anaheim Extension; thence South 89°
39' S0" West along said center line to the Northerly prol~ngatTon
of the Weaterly line of said Anaheim School District land; thence
South 15° 21' 00" East 160.01 feet to the Northwest corner
thereof; thence North 82° 35' 40" East 148.14 feet to the true
point of beginning; and
PARCEL 3: That portion of Lot 40 of Anaheim Extension, as shown
on a Map of Survey by lJilliam Hamel, December ?8G8, filed in the
oFfice of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, California, a
copy of which is shoo-m in book 3, page 163 and following, entitled
"Los Angeles County Maps", in the office of the County Recorder of
Orange County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast
corner of the land described in deed to the Anaheim School
District of Orange County, recorded January 24, 1950 in book 1957,
page 51~ of Official Records of said Orange County, being a point
in the Southerly line of the land described in deed te Er~~in H. W.
Kersten, and wife, recorded June 4, 194$ in book 1647, page 173 of
said Official Records, distant South 74° 41' 40" West 355.09 feet
measured along said line and its Easterly prolongation from the
monumented centerline of Palm Avenue; thence North 15° 21' 00"
41est 215.20 feet, parallel with the centerline of North Citron
Street, along the Easterly line of said land described in deed to
the Anaheim School District of Orarge County to the tdortheast
corner thereof; thence South 82° 35' 40" West 100.00 feet along
the Northerly line of said last mentioned iand to the True Point
of Beginning; thence continuing along said Northerly line South Q2°
35' ~t0" !~!est tOQ.00 `eet; thertce :artn i;° 27' DO" WesC eo tne
centerline of West La Palma Avenue as shown on sald Map of Anaheim
Extension; thence North 89° 39~ 50" East along satd centerline to
a line that bears North 15° 21' 00" West from the True Point of
Reginning; thence along said iine South 15° 21' 00" East to the
true point of beginning.
blHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public heartng at the City
Hali in the City of Anaheim on January 28~ ]980~ at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of r.he Anaheim Municipai Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and agaEnst said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and reco~~mendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission~ after due lnspection, investi9ation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the foilowing facts:
1. That the petitioner proooses reclassification of subject property from
the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone to the Rh-S200 (Residential, t1ultiole-Family) 7.one
to construct three 4-plexes.
-2- PCaO-23
Z• That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for genera)
commercial uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property ts necessary
and/or desirable fo~ the orderly and proper development of the community.
4• That the proposed reclassification of subject property does pro erl
reiate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established
throughout the communtty.
5• That the proposed reclassiftcation of subject property requires the
dedication and improvement or abut:ing streets in accordance with the Ctrcutation
Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensification of land use.
6• That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FIPJDIFIG: That the Anahetm City Planning Commisston has
reviewed the proposal to reclassi y an Irregularly-shaped par~>1 of land consisting
of approximately 0.6 acre having a frontage of 355 feet on the sauth side of la Palma
Avenue, having a maximum depth of approximateiy 107 feet and being located
epproximately 365 feet ~aest of the centerline of Harbor Boulevard fram the CL
(COMMERCIAL, LIMITED) ZONE to the RM-1200 (RESIDE~1T1,4L, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZOP~E and
does hereby approve the Negattve Declaration fro:~ the requirement to prepare an
environmentai impact report on the basis that there wouid be no signiftcant
individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this
Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property
for general commercial land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive
environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted
by the Petitioner indicates no sigr,ificant t~divTdual or cumulattve adverse
environmentai impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregofng
findings is on ftle in the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
N04l, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
18-Zoniny of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from the CL (CQMFIERCIAL, L1141TED) ZONE and to incorporate said described
property i~to the RM-1200 (RESIDENTIAL~ MULTIPLE-FAMILY) ZONE upon the following
conditions Which are hereby found to be a r~ecessary prerequisite to tne proposed use
of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Cttizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the street along La Palma
Avenue for street widenin9 purposes.
2. That al) engineering requirements of the City of Ananeim along La Palma
Avenue including preparation of improvement plans and installation of ail
improvements such as curbs and 9utters, sidewalks, street grading and pavtng,
dratnage fa~ilities or other appurtenant work, shall be complied with as required by
-3- PcBO-23
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on fiie 1n
the Office of the Clty Engineer;or that a bond, certificate of depos(t, letter of
credtt, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be
posted wlth the City to guarantee the installation of the above-mentioned
requirements,
a fee, in3an amount asedetermined~by5theeCityrCouncYlshfor street lhghting ~alonghei_a
Palma Avenue.
a fee, in4an amount asedetermined~byStheeCityrCounc~~shaforPatree the City of Anahefm
along La Palma Avenue. Pianting purposes
5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with anproved
plans on file t•rith the Office of the Executive Director of Public Works.
b• That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
7. That drainaye of subject property shall be dtsposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
8. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
appropriate park and recrcation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the
City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the buildfng permit is issued.
assessment~feeT(Ordinance~Noer3396)~in anyamountPasPdetermined byythee CityflCouncil,
for each new dwell;ng unit prior to the issuance of a building permit,
1~. That the owner(s) of s~5ject property shall submtt a letter requestinq
the termination of Conditional Use Permit ^!o. 1g7~ to tfie Planning Department for
Pianning Commission action.
11. That a 6-foot high masonry wa11 shall be constructed along the south
and west property lines.
12. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordar.ce
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anahetm marked Exhibtt Nos. 1
through 3.
~3. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subiect property,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 10, above-mentioned, shall be ccmpleted. T~n
prov(sions or rights granted by this resolution shall become nu;l and void by action
of the Planning Commission unless said conditions are comptted with withln on= y~ar
from the date hereof, or such further time as the Planning Commissior. may gra~}
14. That Condition tJos. 5, 6, 7, 11 and 12, above-mentioned, s;~all be
complied with prior to final buflding and zoning (rtspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Clty PTanning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with eac'i and all of the conditions 5ersinabove set forth.
-~~- PC80-23
~'` ,
,f '
Should any such condttion, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdictton, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contairted, shal) be deemed nu11 and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOPJ is signed and approved by me this 28th day of
January, 1980.
~ . -~ 7
/ ~r ~l~~- . G = /~ ~,~
CHA I RhiAtJ, A~~AHE I M C I TY PLANN I PIG C014P1 I55 I ON
ATTEST:
~~~ `~~ ~ ~
SECRETARY, qNAHEtM CITY LANNING CONMISSIOM
STATE OF CA.LIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORqtdG[ ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~, Edith l. Harris. Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
here~y certtfy that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim Ctty Planning Commission held on January 28, iS90, by the following vote
of tne members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, OAVID, FRY, HERBST, KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIOPlERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIOPJERS: BUSHORE
~N WITNESS WHEREOF, ( have hereunto set my hand this ?8th day of January,
t9ao.
~~ ~° ~- .
SECRETARf, ANAHEIM CITY PLA!~7NING COMMISSION
-5- PC8~-23