PC 80-239~V
: >,
~;,.,.;~,
RESOLUTION N0. PC80-239
A RESOLUTIOPJ OF TNE ANAHEIM CITY PLAPlNItJG COMMISStON
THAT PETI710N FOR COPJDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2152 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Rnaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Perriit from LOUIS E MAPJUEf_ WALTER CO., et al, 9350
Wilshire Boulevard, Sujte 212~ Beverly Flills, California, 90212, owner~ and JANES
STOVALL, 1110 West Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California g2802, agent, of certain real
Property situated in the Ci*yo uf Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Caltfornia~
described as:
Parcel 1 as shoHm by that certain parcel map recorded in book 22~
page 13 of Parcel Maps, records of Orange County, California.
Center inWLheECitytof AnaheimaoniDecembers15~n19$O,hatd ~:30b~j~ hearing at the Civic
public hearing having been duly given as required by lao-~ andPin~acco~dance wtthsthe
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code~ Chapter 18,03, to hear and consider
evldence for and against said praposed condttional use permit and to inv~sstigate and
make ftndings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investtgation and study made
bY itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Munlcipal Code Section 1f3.48,050.160 to wit: ta
permit on-sale of alcoholtc beverages in an existing motel with the following waiver:
SECTION 18.06.060.0232 - Minimum number of arkin spaces.
22 s aces required;
17~ existing)
2. That the requested waiver is hereby granted on the basis that the bar
will be used only by motel guests and that a certain percentage of the guests arrive
by transportation modes other than private automobiles.
3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area 1n which it is proposed to be located,
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
a11ow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not de~rimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
S. That the aranting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Cittzens of the City of Anaheim,
Pc8o-239
~ARA
1 IF1r.;,
6. 7hat the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and imo~oved to carry the traffic in
the area.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petttion.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Director or his authortzed
representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the CTty of Anaheim
Envlronmental Impact Report Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLUED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit~ upon the following
conditions whlch are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1, That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of Public Works.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file ~~ith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1.
3. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentio~;ed, shall be complied vrith
prior to ftnal building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Shouid any such condition~ or any part thereof, be deciared invaiid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent Jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 15th day of
December, 1980,
/~ l.~ ~~
CHAIR AN~ ANAHEIM CI PLA NING COMPiiS510N
ATTEST:
(n ~ ~ ~~tn.c~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- PC8o-239
+ },,,~`~,nA' 4 r~; ' '
~ ,.:.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on December 15, 1980, by the foilowing vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BOUAS~ BUSHORE, FRY, KiNG, TULAR
NOES: COMMISSIQNERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HERBST
1980.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of December,
~O! /sa'~~, ~ ~~t.+L~e1
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLArIrJING COMMISSION
-3- PC30-239
~..