Loading...
PC 80-55RESOLUTION N0. PC80 -55 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2063 BE GRANTED WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit from WOODWARD R. ARCHER AND EUNICE L. ARCHER, ET AL, 1180 North Blue Gum Street, Anaheim, California 92806, owners of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as: PARCEL A: LOT 1 AND THAT PORTION OF LOT 2 OF TRACT N0. 5019, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN 8001: 318, PAGES 21 AND 22 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 64, PAGE 30 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; AND PARCEL B: AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER THE WESTERLY 7.00 FEET OF PARCEL 2, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED 1M BOOK 64, PAGE 30 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on March 24, 1980, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered as said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.600.601 to wit: to retain an automobile restoration shop in the ML (Industrial, Limited) Zone. 2. That the proposed use is hereby granted for a period of three years, subject to review by the Planning Commission for possible extensions of time if the use has not had an adverse use on surrounding properties. 3. That the proposed use is hereby granted, subject to the petitioner's stipulation that there shall be no outdoor work or storage and that all activities except customer and employee parking shall be conducted wholly inside the building. 4. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. PC80 -55 5. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 6. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 7. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 8. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to retain an antique automobile restoration shop in the ML (Industrial, Limited) Zone on a rectangularly- shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.58 acre located at the southwest corner of Coronado Street and Blue Gum Street having a frontage of approximately 130 feet on the south side of Coronado Street and having a frontage of approximately 170 feet on the east side of Blue Gum Street; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for general industrial land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That sidewalks shall be installed along Blue Gum and Coronado Street as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the difference between the industrial and commercial traffic signal assessment fees (Ordinance No. 3896) in an amount as determined by the City Council, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. That the auto restoration shop shall comply with all signing requirements of the ML zoning. -2- PC80 -55 4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3. 5. That Condition Nos. 1, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections, or within a period of ninety (90) days from the date hereof, whichever occurs first. 6. That all restoration activities and storage shall be conducted wholly inside the building. 7. That the use is granted for a period of three (3) years, at which time and upon written request of the petitioner, the Planning Commission may grant an extension of time if the use has not had an adverse impact on surrounding industrial uses and properties. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that the adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any condition or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 24th day of March, 1980. ATTEST: Sat ‘te SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) CHAIRMAN PRO TEMPORE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on March 24, 1980, at 1:30 p.m.,by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAVID, FRY, HERBST, KING, TOLAR NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BUSHORE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of March, 1980. I SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 3 - PC80 -55