PC 80-63RESOLUTIOM N0. PC30-63
A RESOLUT I Ot~ OF THE A~L1HE I M C I TY PLAtItJ i N6 COHht I SS I OPI
TIIAT PET IT ION FOR RECLASS I f ICAT ION PIO, 7~1-90-34 f3E DE~! I ED.
b1HER:'AS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission dtd initiate a petitfon for
Reclassification for certain real property situated in tF~e City of Anaheim, Coianty of
Orange, State of California, described as folloo-~s:
Parcel 1: That pcrtion uf Vineyard Lot A-1, as shoo-m on a map
recorded in Book 4, pages 62~ and 630, of Deeds, records of Los
Angeles County, Calif., described as follows: Deginning at the
southeast corr.er of Tract No. 3024, as sho~•:n on a map recorded in
Book 103, page 30, tliscellaneous !1aps, records of said Orange
County; thence following along tlie east Ilne of Tract fJo. 3Q24,
the following courses and distances td 15° 43' 15" 1J, 185.00 feet;
thence S 74° 15' 48" W, 10.00 feet; thence N 15° 54' 15" 4J, 233•?5
feet; thence P7 7-E° 15' 48" E, 1~.00 feet; thence (J 15° 43' 15" ld,
157.00 feet to the northeast corner ef said Tract tJo, 3021E
boundary; thence S 740 15' 48" W, 255.54 feet along the north line
of said Tract No. 3024 to the northwest corner thereof, said
northr~est corner being a point in the east line of Tract ~lo. 1618,
as shown on a map recorded in ~ook t+?, pages 15 and 16,
Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County; thence EJ 150
43' 35" W. 225 feet along a port;on of the east line of said Tract
~~o. 1G18 to the northeast corner of Lot 52 in said Tract t7o. 1618,
said ~dortheast corner being a point in a line parallel ~•~ith and
31.7~ feet southerl;~ o` the cer.teriine of I3ortn Street; tf~ence h!
74° 15' 43" E~ 210,00 feet along said parallel line to an
intersection ~oith the west line of the East 164 feet of said
Vineyard Lot A-1; thence S 15° 43' 15" E, 80 feet alc,ng said West
ltne to an intersection with a line parallel with and ~0 feet
southerly of the north line of said Uineyard Lot A-1; thence N 74~
15' 48" E, 164 feet along said narallel iine to an intersection
with a line parallel o-rith and 33.00 feet aresterly of the
centerline of East Street; thence S 15° 43' 15" E, 711.9n feet
along the iast mentioned parallel line to an intersection with the
easterly prolongaCion of the south line of the aforementioned
Tract Plo. 3024; thence S 74~ 15' 48" 41, 120 feet along said
prolongation to the point of beginning; and
Parcel 2: That portion of Lot 115 in Anaheim Extension, as shown
on a map filed in Book 3, pages 1G3, et seq, Los An9eles County
Plaps, records of said Orange County, describeci as folloo-~s:
Commencing at the centerltne inters~ction of E~st Street with the
centerline of East Ilortli Street, as sho~•m on a map of Survey
recorded in Book 17, page jE7, Records of Surveys, records oT
Orange County; thence S 74" 50' 20" l•!, t~S,On feet; thence N 150
~6~ ~5" «, 41.25 Feet to the true point of '~eginning of the parcel
PC8o-63
hereinafter described; ther,ce S 71~° 50' 20" W, 91r.~3 feet; then~e
N l5° 06' 25" bl, 150 feet; thence N 74° 50' 20" E, 325.!1G feet;
thence 5 l5° 06' 25" E, 35.~0 feet, more or less; thence t! 74° 50'
20" E, 146.53 feet; thence ~J 15° ~6' 25" E, 115.l~1 feet, mor: or
less to an intersectton ~•~ith a line parallcl a~ith and 30.00 feet
southerly o` the centerline of La Palma Avenue; thence PJ RaO 56'
15" E, 297.28 fcet; thence S 15° ~6' 25" E, 2?_.~0 feet to an
intersection witF~ a line paratlel ~•rith and 53.~~ feet southerly of
the centerline of La Palma Avenue; thence N 3~° 56' 15" E, 134.08
feeC to the beginnin9 of a curve concave southt•~esterly and having
a radius of 25 feet; thence Easterly and Southerly alon9 said
curve through a central angle of 7~s° 57' 3~" an arc distance of
32.71 feet ta an intersection oiith a line parallel with and 45.00
feet westerly of the centerline of East Street; thence Southerly
along said parallel line a distance of 53.47 feet to the beginning
of a curve concave northwesterly and havina a radius of 15.0~
feet; thence Southerly and Westerly alono said curve through a
central angle of 89° 56' 45" an arc distance of 23•55 feet to an
intersection taith the north line of tJorth Street; thence N 7G~ 5~'
20" E, 26.f39 feet to the true point of beginning.
IJHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hoid a ~ublic hearina at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on April 7, 1~80, at 1:3n p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as ~equired by 1~~•~ and in accordance ~•~ith the
prov;sions of the Anaheim hiunlcipal Code, Chapter 1~.03, to hear and consider
evider.ce for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therea~ith; and
WNEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reoorts
offereu 3t S.~iii: tiC~1~iT'iL3~ (.~O^~ F1lTC~ 3f:!~ r1(.tprl+!1f1^ tfl^ Fn~~OI'f~fl(7 facts:
1. That the Anaheim City Planning Commission proposes reclassification of
subject property from the RS-7200 (RESIDEPITIAL, SItJGLE-FA~11L1') ZOPIE to ~he RM-?400
(RESIDCtJTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAt11LY) ZOPlE.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for medYum
density residential land uses.
3. That tfie proposed reciassification of subject property is not necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper devetopment of the comm~nity.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not
property relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close
proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally
est~blished throughout the community.
5. That approximately 32 persons indicatei their presence at said public
hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence t~ras received in oppos+tion to the
suhject petition.
-2- PCBO-63
ENVIROP;~IEPJTAL INPACT FINDIPJG: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the RS-7200 (P,ESIDENTIAL,
S I WGLE-FAt11 LY) ZONE to the RN-21E00 (P,E I DEtdT i/IL ~ MULT I PLE-FA!11 LY) ZONE on an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consistiny of approximately 5.8 acres having a
frontage of apFroximately 725 feet on the ~•~est side of East Street, 210 feet on the
south side of North Street and 900 feet on the north side of tlorth Street; and does
hereby disapprove the Flegative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an
environmental impact report on the basis that there r~ould be significant individual
or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this P~egative
Declaration ; that sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal;
that the Initial Study indicates significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and that the tlegative Declaration substantiating the foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
tJ04l, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby deny subject Petition for Reclassification.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOPI is signec and approv~d by me this 7th day of April,
~gao.
~, -
' ;, t~ . -t - ~
f HA i R4lOt1AN, APlAHE I H C I TY PLAP~~J I PJf; COMM I SS I ON
ATTEST:
~~ ~ ~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COh1t115510~1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUPJTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIN )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on April 7, 19P0, h~~ the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: C011MISSIQtlERS: BARNES, BUSHORE, UAVID, FRY, HEFBST, KltlG
NOES: CO"1~11 SS I ONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COPIHISSIONERS: TOLAR
ItJ WITNESS 4MEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of April, 1g80.
~~. ~
SECRETARY, ANAFIEIH CIT PI.ANNIPJ, COMMISSION
-3- PCao-63