PC 80-78P,ESOLUTIOM rd0, PC2n-7~
A RESOLUT I OtJ OF THE Ahl.4HE i M C I TY PLAP~N I~t~ C0~1'1 I 55 I OH
TH.4T PETITION FOR CO~IDIT10?!AL US[ P[R~11T N0. 2077 BE 6RA`1TED
WHEREAS. the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verTfied
Petition for Conditicnal Use Permit from R/1YMOtdD G. SPEIiAR, ET AL, ~?37 Avend?da De
Santiago. Anaheim~ California, 928~7, oo-,ners, and A~ITN^NY H. VP.LADEZ, 5771 East La
Palma Avenue, Anaheim, California ~23~7, agent, of certain real property sit~3ted in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
That portion of lands alloted in the Final Decree of Partftion of
the Rancho Canon de Santa Ana, a certified copy of o-~hich ~~as
recorded February 3, 1C74 in book 28, page 158 of Deeds, r~cOrds
of Los Rngeles County, California, dascribed as follows: F3rcel
Flo. 1 as shown on a ttap filed in booF; u5, pages 2~ and 21 of
Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Orange County,
Californta.
WHEREAS, the City Plannin~ Commissien did hold a puh]ic hcaring at the Cfty
Hall in the City of Anaheim on Hay 5, 1~~3~, at 1:3n p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required b~,• la4r and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Plunicipal Code, Chapter 13.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therev~ith; and
WfiERE:~S, said Commission, after due inspection, investioation and study made
bY itself and in its behalf~ and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said liearing, does find and determine the folloiving facts:
1, That the proposed use is properly one for 4ihich a condltional use
permtt is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.l~~+.050.n10 to wit: to
permit on-sale beer and wlne in an existing restaurant.
2, That the proposed use o~ill not adversely affect the acijoining lan' uses
and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
partlcular area nor to the peace, healt~~, safety, and general ~•~elFare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
4, That the granting af the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed~ if any, ~•~ill not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheir,.
5, That the tra`fic generated by the proposed use ~•+ill not impose an undue
burden upon the street~ anr.}~~ghways ciesigned and improved to carry the traffic in
thc area.
PC80-78
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
oPposition; and that no correspondence ioas received in opposition to the subject
Petition.
ItJ WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand thi~ 5th day of May, 19R0.
~~ ~ -1~~.
ECRF AR ~ N N,. M C AN~! N~ COMM i SS I ON
-2- PC80-78
ENVIROtJ~1ENTAL 1~1PACT FINDI~JG: The Pianning Directar or his authorized
reoresentative has determined that the proposed project falls within the def(nition
of Categorlcal [xemptions, Class 1, as dcfined in Paragraph 2 of the City of Anaheim
[nvironmental Impact Report Guidelines and is, therefore. categorically exenpt from
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
N04l~ THEREFORE~ 6E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commfssion
does hereby 9rant subject Petitior for Conditional llse Permit, upon the following
conditions ~•~hich are hereby found to be a necessary prerequistte to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to prc:serve tl~e safety and general welfare of the
Cittzens of the City of Ar;aheim:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantiilly in accordance
with plans and specifications on file ~rith the City of Anaheim marked Exhfbit PJos. 1
and 2,
BF IT FIIRTHtR RESOLVED that the ,4naheim City Planning ComMission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predfcated upan
~ppticant's compiiance ~•~tt!i each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth,
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
bY the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOItJG RESOLI!TIO~J is signed and approved by me this 5th day of May,
1~80,
ATTEST:
~~~ ~,~
~.
,i ~.~, ; ~ `u ~~.. .~._
GiA I RY1GFilifV, HN~HE I M C I TY PLl1'1N I N~ CO'+-+ I SS I ON
SECRETARY, A~~AHEIM CITY PLANPlING CONMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Cor~mission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution ~:as passed and adopted at a meettng of
the Anaheim C~ty Planntna Commtssion held on May 5, 1q$p, by the followtng vote of
the members thereof;
AYES; COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ D11VID, FRY, HERBST, Kl~lr,~ T!1LAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BUSHORE
~...,