PC 80-79RFSOLUTIO~J PJO. PCBn-7~
A RESOLUTIOt: OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLADlMItlG COHMISSION
ADOPTIPlG AND RECOMMEMDIPIG TO TIiE CITY COU~!CIL OF THE
CITY OF APIAHEl~1 ADOPTIOtJ OF
ANAHEIN GEt1ERAL PLAN Ap1F~l9~1ENT MQ. 155
LADID USE ELEMFNT R^!D CIRCULATIOt! ELE'1ENT
WHEREAS, the City Council of tfie City of Anaheim did adopt the Anaheim
Generai Plan by Resolution No. 69-61+!~, sho~•~ing the generat description and extent of
land uses ~~ithin the City and indicating the present belief of the Council as to
possible future development and redevelopment of )and o-~ithin the City; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to requests from property oo-mers for General Plan study~
the Anaheim City Planning Commission directed City staff to prepare a General ?lan
Amendment for property consisting of approximately 95~ acres generally located south
of the Bauer Ranch, a~est of the ldallace and Douglass Ranches~ narthwest and north of
the Southern California Edison easement and east of the present Anaheim Hilis Planned
Community, and that Monte Vista Road betareen Santa Ana Canyon P,oad and lleir Canyon
Road be deleted as a ttillside Secondarv Arterial liighway from the Circulatton Element
of the General Plan.
WHEREAS, the Planning Department deemed it appropriate, pursuant to the
Provisions of the Californnia Environmental Quality Act, to prepare Environmental
Impact Report Plo. 231 in connection with the General Plan Amendment for the foregolr,g
area under consideration; an~
WHEREAS, The Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
Anaheim City Hall, Council Chamber, 204 East Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, on March 24~
1980, at 1:3~ p.m.~ notice of said puhlic hearina having hoen ~1~)~ ~(ver 3; required
hY 1a:r and ir accorJance witf~ the provistons of the Anaheim Hunicipal Code, to hear
and consider evidence for and against said Amendnent to the Anaheim General Plan and
to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connectton thereo-itth; and
said public hearing was continued to the meeting of May 5, 19F0; and
WHEREAS~ said Commission, after duc inspection, investtgation and study made
bY itself and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offere. at said public hearing, DOES 4ERFBY FIND:
1, That evidence aias presented which substantiates the need for an
amendment to the Anaheim General Plan, and it is deemed a~nrnpriate tha~ "Exhlbit A
Amended" be adopted subject to a further amendment designatinr i p~rL, sl~ nenerally
located south/sou[h~vest of the commercial s1re.
2, That the petitioner stipulated at the pu}lic hear' that the c»ximum
number of resfdential units shall be 2Fq0 for this antire gene~
area. plan amendment
3. That suhsequent to the advertisement for deletion of !tonte Vista P,oad~
the petitioner suhmitted a letter requestiny withdrawal of t~,eir request for an
amendment to the Circulation Element.
PCan-7q
~lOW, THEREF~RE, BE IT RESOLVED that Environmental Impact Report No. 231,
having been considered this date by the Anaheim City Planninn Commission and
evidence, both ~•rritten and oral, having been presented to supplenent sald EIP, ~lo.
231, thc Planning Commission o~lieves that said EIZ ~lo. 231 <loes conform to the City
and Statc Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality Act and, based
upon suc~i information, does recomnend ttiat the City Council certify said EIR PJo. 231,
together 4+ith the Statement of Overriding Consideratlons as follows: "!•lhereas, the
Anaheim City Council has reviel•red EIR Plo. 231 for the proposed General Plan Amendment
for Anaheim Hllis P~znning Units I, Ii, III~ IX and .K and has determined that sald
report identifies the follao-ring potential significant impacts which sa(d project
could have on tfie environment: ~;) There rrill be an increase in automobil:: traffic
which ~•~i11 generate congestion, noise and air o~llution in the area. '~) There will be
an increase in tlie number of students ~•rhich ~•~ill create an additional burden on
schools ~•~h~ch cio not have adequate capacity for them. ~) ~rading will occur on
approximately 355 of the project area aiith consequent alteration of landforms,
disruption to fiora and fauna and destruction of specimen trees. *) Development of
the area could have an adverse impact on the hiological resourses of 4Jeir Canyon;
however, ~e) such enviornmental impacts ~•~ill be reduced hy conpllance with City
Codes, Poiicies and Procedures, and (b) the project ~~ri11 bring substantial beneftts
to the ~~t~zens of Anaheim hy providing enployment and permittir,g the development of
a higlz q~aiity resider,tial cor~munity to assist in meeting tl~e demand for houstng,and
(c) economic and social considerations ma{;e it feasible to mitigate all of the
tmpacts identified in the EIR. Noti~~, therefore, the City Council does adopt this
Statement of Ovcrriding Considerations in approving General Plan Amendment No. 155.
BE IT FURTFiER RESOLVED that, pursuant to the foregoinq findings the Anaheim
City Planrting Commission does hereby adopt and recommend to the City Councii of the
City of Anaheim, adoption of General Plan Amendment ~~o. ~55, as foilows:
i• Flrea 1- Land llse Element - that "Exhibit A Amended" 6e adopted subject
to a further amendm2nt designating a park site generally located south/southwest of
the commercial site; and further that a maximum ef 26~0 resiclential da!elling units be
permitted in this General P;an Amendment Area,
2. Area II - Circulation Element - that the requested deletion of Monte
Vista Road beto-reen Santa Ana Canyon Road and l:eir Canyon Road as a Secondary Artrial
Hfghway be withdraam.
TNE FOREGOIDlG R[SOLUTIOta is signed and approved by me tt~is 5th day of '1ay,
198Q.
~i~irc./Q _ _ J~ ~~e ~
CIIA I R4/OMAM, AFlAIIF. I"+ C I TY PL4rItJ I N~ CQMM I SS I ON
ATTEST:
n ~C~. ~ ~Lti~
SECRETARY, A~lAHEIM CITY PL/1PINI~J~ C(1~1.MISSIDt1
-2- Pr,90-~~
ST/1TE OF CqLIFORrlIR )
COUtJTY OF ORq;~gE ) ss.
C ITY OF ANAHEI~1 )
~~ Edith L. Narris, Secretary of the Anaheim Ctty Planning Comroission, do
hereb;i certify that *.he foregoing resolution r~a~
the Anahein City Planning Conxnission held ~~ ~~aasrs-`~`~ and adopted at a meettng of
the memoers thereof: Y>> >9~'~, ~~Y the following vote of
AYES: COMP115510~lERS: BAR~dES g
, USHORE, DAVID, F2Y, HER.CST, Kltlf, TOLAR
VOES: COMMISSIOIIERS: NOtIE
ABSENT: ~OMMISSIOFlERS; FlOME
, ~F~ WITtI[SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of ~1ay, 1980,
S~~~ct~q~~~-~~' ~'TY P~ .
J1qr~ ~ p~r ~~r~M I 55 I ON
-3 PC'3~-79
~