PC 80-85^.
R[SOLUTIOt~ IJO. PC8(1-35
A RESOLUTIOtJ OF ThIE AIJAHEItt CITY PLP,r~riir~c COHMISSIOW
THAT PETITIOPI FOR COPIDITIOflAL USE PERMIT M0. 2~81 BE GRAMTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from NDJ ASSOCIAT[S, 2426 22nd Street, Ne~aport
Beach, California, g2Fi07, owner, and HARVEY lJ. 4lOLFE, 11~i1 North Cosby Way, Suite
"E", Anaheim, California 92306, agent, of certain real property situated in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Ca~ifornia, described as:
PARCEL 3, IF! THE CITY OF ANANEIM, COUPITY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, RS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IM BOOY. 4~ PAr,ES 5 AIdD 6 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUFJTY RECOP,DER OF SAID COUNTY.
blHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on tlay 19, 19g0, at 1:3~ p.m., notice of said public
hearin9 having been duly given as required by lav~ and in accordance with the
provistons of the AnaAeim Muntcipal Code, Chapter 1R.~3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of a11 evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the followind facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is auth~rPzed hy Anaheim "1unlctpal Code Section 1°.!1,^Sf:.C'1R,G0; Lo wit: to
retain an existing exterminating service.
2. That the proposed use ~ri11 not adversely affect the acljointng land uses
and the growth 3nd development of the area in ~~rhich it is proposed to be located.
3. Ti~at the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full deve~opment of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace~ health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the Ctty of Anahe?m.
4. That ths granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
a~elfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the traffic generated by the proposed use wfll not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highv~ays designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
PCdo-85
~. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence ~•+as received in opposition to the subject
petition.
EtJVIRO~lMENTAL 111PACT FIDlDIWG: That thn Anaheim City Plannino Commission has
reviewed the proposal to retain an existing exterminating service on a rectangularly-
shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 2.1! acres, having a frontage of
approximately 312 feet on the ~•~est side of Cosby blay, having a maximum depth of
approximately 3f~~~ feet and being located approximately 2~3 feet north of the
cen*_erline of La Palma Avenue; and does herehy approve ttie tlegative Declaration from
the requirement t~~ prepare an environmental im~act report on the basis that there
would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to
the approval of this Plegative Declaration since the AnaheiM General Plan designates
the subject property for generalindustrial land uses commensurate ~~ith the proposal;
that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the
Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no siqnificant individuat or
cumulat+ve adverse environmental impacts; and that the Plegative Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in t!~e City of Anaheim Planning
Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R.FCOL~ED that the Anaheim City Planntn~ Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions ~ahich are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite *_o the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and 9eneral welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That subject property shall be develo~~ed substantially in accordance
with plans and speci~ications on file ti-+ith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit PJos. 1
and 2.
SE !T F!fRTNER RESOL~IED that the Anahe+m City Plannin~ Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applica~t's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, I~e declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then thts Resol~tion.
and any approvals herein contained, shall be cfeemed null ~nd votd.
1g8o.
THE FOREGOIPlG RESOLUTIOP! is signed and approved hy me this 1?th day of htay,
~'~C~~..~ ~ 5~~.-~
CHA I Rl•IOMAPl, ANAHE I ~1 C I TY PLANPI I PI9 COP1N I SS I ON
ATTEST:
~p ~ ~ ~[~~~-R/li,..~-..
SECP,ETARY, APlAHE 1 N C ITY PLA~dPI I PIG C0~1^11 SS 10~!
-2- PC8~-85
STATE OF CALIFORyIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
i, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution ~ras passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on May 19, 19$!1, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMPIISSIOPlERS: BARNES, 4USHORE, DA'JID, FRY, HERBST, KIP:~, TOLAR
NOES: COMt11SS[O~IERS: PlOME
ABSEN}'; C6MHISSIOtIERS: NOPIE
IN WIiP~ESS IJNEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th uay of t1ay, 1980.
~~ ,t~ i~~
SECP,ETAP,Y, A~IAHE I M C I TY PLA~dDI i ~~r COMF1 i 5S I0N
-3- PC8o-85