PC 80-87f.
-1
~
R^SOL'1TIOI! '10. PC?n_n
A R[S~L'ITIOtI QF TI!E /1t!1IIE1"1 CITY PL~,!I,11"J!; Cn~+,~+ISSI~M
T{{l1T PETITIO!! FOR RFCL.4SSIFIC/1TIOi! il~. 7^-`;0-?~3 BE GR/1~lTFD.
W!!EREl1S, the Anahein City Planning Commission rlid rer_eive a verified
petition for Reclassification from GIL ROD4.IGIIE?, ET AL, Rn~ tJorrh Fern Street,
Orange, California ~2;61, o~~rners of ccrtain rcal prr~~,erty sittiated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, descrihed as follo~•~s;
Lots 7 and ? in B1ocE: 1 of 2esh's SuLdtvision of a~art of
Vineyard Lot D-G In thr_ City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, as sho~~n on a ma~ recorded in Bo~l; 1~, Paae p?_ of
Niscellaneous Naps, records in the office of the County Recorder
of satd County.
4/HEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a puhlic hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on June 2, 1~'i~, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly yiven as requirecl by law. and in accerdance r~ith provisions
of the Anaheim "lunicipal Code, Chapter iP.~3, tc hear ancl c~nsider eviclence for and
against said proposed reclasstfication and to investignte ancl ma!<e `tndings and
reconmendations in connection thereo-~ith; and
41tIEREqS, said Commission, after due inspection, investinatinn and study made
by itself and in its behalf, ancf af;,er due consideration of ~11 evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determi~e the f~l)o~.~tn~ facts:
the R"1-74~~ That the petitioner~proposesYjeclassific~tion nn,15uhjeCt property from
(Resld~ntial Multi le-Famil 7one t~ the 1?n.7 (,^,esidential,
,lultiple-Family) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim Gener~l Plan d~sian,r~s c~~tij^"' `
~~"s i t',' ; cs i Jen t i a 1 i and uses. - ~ :Pert'~ ~ ~r ned i iim-
3. That the proposed recla,sification of suhject oroperty is necessarv
and/or desirable for the orderly an:l proper development o` the comm~_inity.
~+. That the proposed reclassificatton of suhject pronerty does properly
relat2 to the zones and their ~ermitted uses locally estaFlished in close proximJty
to subject property and to the zonAs and their permitted iises ~enerallv establishe~l
throuyhout the comnunity.
5, That the proposed reclassification of subject prnnerty requires the
de:Jication of abuttin9 streets and alleys in accorrlance aiith the Circulation Elament
of the General Plan, dur. to the anticipatc.d incrc~ase in traffic which io 11 be
generated by tfie intensification of land use.
~. That no one indicated t'~eir presence at said public hearinc in
opposition; and that no correspondence ~~as rr,ceived in onpnsitir,n to suhjeet
petition.
PC^~-Q]
ENVIROtJMEFlTP.L I'IPACT FI~JDIh;G: T'ri~t thc /lnaheir~ City Planning Comciission has
reviewed th~ proposal to reclassif sub'ect ,_
h~ultiple-Family) 7one to the F;1-12^~ (Gesidenti~al,rlultip1e11Fani~1~~~1'~~ ~Residential,
a 9-unit apartment eomplex i•~ith ~•~aivers of minimum lan:lscaoe:l setbacin andeominimum
recreational-leisure area on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consfsting of
appro~cimately 0,~5 acre located at th~ northeast corner of Chartres Street and Citron
Street, having a frontaye c~f approximately 122 feet on the north side of Chartres
Street and a frontage of 91 feet on the east side of Citron Street; ar,d does hereby
approve the tJegative Declaration from the req~.iirenent to prepare an environmental
impact report on the basis tliat tliere :-~ould be no sic~nificant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approva] of Chis ?leaattve
Declaration since the Anaheim aeneral Flan designates the subject property for
medium-density land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive
environmental inpacts are involved in thc proposal; that the Initial Study submitted
bY tlie petitioner inJicates no si9nificant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and that the P:egative Declaration substantiating t5e foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
~~~k', THEREFOP,E, BE IT RFSOLVED that the Anahein City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for P,eclassification and, by so doing, that Title
13-Zoning of the Anaheim ~lunicipal Code be anended to exclude the a!~ove-descrtbed
property from *_he R!1-2400 (RESIDEtITiAL, H!JLTIPI.F-FFl~tILY) ZONE and to incorporate said
described property into the Rt1-1200 (RESfDE'lTIAL, ~UILTIPLE-FA~IILY) ZO;JE upon the
folloU~tng conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general ~•~elfare
of the Citizens of the City of flnaheim:
1. That the owner(s) o` suhject property shall deed to the City of Anahe`r
a strip of land 3p feet in ~iidth from the centerline of the street along Chartres
Street, including a 15 foot property radius at Cttron Street and a strip of land 1p
feet in ~•iidth from the centerline of tl~e alley for str?et ~•~idenin~ puro~s~5,
2. That trasn storage areas shall be orovided in accordance aiith approved
plans on file r~ith the Office of the Executive Director of Public b/orF;s.
3. That drainaye of subj.~ct property shall be disoosed of in a manner
satisfactory Co the City Enginaer,
ap~ro riate rhat the oo-~ner of subject prcaert/ shall pay to the CiCy of Flnaheim the
p park and recreation in-lieu fees as determinec! to he appropriate by the
City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the buildi~g permit is issued.
5. That the oiL~ner(s) or subject property shall pay the trafif!c signal
assessment fee (Ordinance ~lo. 339G) in an amount as deCr_rmined by the City Council,
for each new d~•~elling unit prior to the issuance oF a building permit.
6. That subject pro~erty shsll he developed substantially in accordance
with plans ar~d specificattons on file tai±h the City of Anaheim narked Fxhibit i!os. i
througli 3,
7. Prior to the introduction oP an ordinance re-r.onlig subject property,
Condition P;o, 1, above-mentioned, sha11 be completed. The provisions or rights
grante~ 6y th;s resolution shall hecone null and void by action of the Planning
"~' PCBO-(37
Commission unless saici conditions are complied ~vitti ~~ithin one year fr~m the date
hereof, or such further timc ~s the Planning Commission may c~rant.
8, That Condition P~os. 2, 3 and 6, above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior te final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FUP,TNER f;ESOLVED that tlie Anaheim City ?lanning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adnption of tliis Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance !~~ith each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null anci vold.
TNE FOREGOING RESOLUTI0~1 is signed and approved by me this 2nd day of June,
1930.
ATTEST:
/I~~~ ~._ ~ ~ rl~i~ _,..~
CNFl I R!dQ!111il, A71A I ~1 C i TY PLII~;!J I ~l~ CO!"M I SS I ON
`~~ ~° ~~,
SECRETIIRY, AI1qF;E It1 C ITY PLANN I IIG CO'1't l 5510~1
STATE OF CALIFOR~lIA )
COUHTY OF ORANGE j ss.
C I1'Y OF A"JAHE IH )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Cornmission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution r,as passed and aciopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Rlanning Commission held on June 2, 1~40, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COM~MISSIOIJERS: BARPIES, BUSHOf',E, !1AVID, FP,'f, HERBST, Kit•I~, TOLAR
NOES : COMM I SS I ONEfiS: PJOPlE
ABSENT: CO?1MISS10'lERS: tJOtdE
IPI WITPIESS WfIEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 7_nd day of June, 1980.
- [~ ~.G~~c. o~• /`~t/4.~.
SECRETARY, A?1AHE I M C I Tl' PL/1^IN 1 D~G COM;1 I SS I Oh
-3- PC3n-u7