PC 80-91RF~OLUTIOM tJO. PC30-91
A RESOLUTI OPI OF THE A~lAHE I F1 C I TY PLAN~J I Nr, ~0~1M I SS I OPJ
THAT PETITIO~I FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERt11T PJO. 207( BE GRAPITED
WHERFAS, i.he Anaheirn City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permtt from C. DARLE NALE APJD ROGERT P,.ALLE"I, 3910 East
Coronado Street, Unit A, Anaheim, Califor~ia 92f30(, o~•rners, and Rp.LPH STELLA, 3910
East Coronado Street, Section G; RICK STRAU~?E, 391~ East Coronado, Sections D and E;
ROPJ LAMARSHE, 3860 East Coronado Street, Sections C and D; and STEVE SAUERS, 38Fp
East Coronado Street, Sect:on F; all i~ Anaheim, California, g2805, agents, of
certain reai property situated in tlie City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as:
That portion of the Northaiest quarter of Section 4, Township t~
South, Range 9 41est, of tha San Bernardino Meridian, Parcel F, as
shoo-rn on a map filed in bool: 131, page 26 of Parcel Maps, in the
office of the Recorder of Orange County, California.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public nearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on June 2, 1q8~, r,t 1;30 p.m., nottce of said public
hearing haviny been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code~ Chapter 18.p3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to tnvestigate and
make findtngs and recommendations in connection therewith; and
4lf1EREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by ttself and tn Its behalf, and after due consideration of all evtdence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for a~hich a conditional use
permit is author(zed by Anaheim Municipal Code Section iR,F~,pS~,~nn,~p~ to wtt: To
permit four automotive repair facilities in an ML (Industrtal, Limited) Zone.
2. That the proposed use consisting of four autoMOtive repair facilities
in an industria) complex is hereby granted for a period of three years, subJect to
review and consideration for posstble extensions of time if the uses hare not had an
adverse impact on other nearby uses.
and the growthTa~nd developmentdofSthelarea~inawhicheit isfproposedato~beilocated.USes
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for che use i~ adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under trie cond~tions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and 9eneral
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahelm,
PCII~-91
^-..... ,.
6• That the traffic generated by the proposed use ~•~iil not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and high~-~ays designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
7. That no one i~dicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that na correspondence was received in onposition to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONttEtlTAL IMPACT FI~lDIMG: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to permit four automotive repair facilities in the ML
(Industrial, Limited) Zone on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of 1.5
acres, having a frontage of aooroxirnately 315 feet and being located approximately
714 feet west of the centerline of Van Buren Street, an~l does hereby approve the
Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report
on the basis that there would be no significant indtvidual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for generai industriai lar.d uses
commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved
in the proposal; that the Initiai Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no
signtficant i~dividual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the
Negative Declaration substantiating the fnregoing findings is on file in the City of
Anaheim Planning Departnent.
NO'~J, TNEREFORE, EiE !T P,ESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, u~.on the following
conditions which are hereby ~ound to be a necessary prerequtsite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general r;elfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That all auto repair i•~ork and storage shall be conducted wholly inside
the buildings,
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file ~•rith the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit ~los. 1
through 5.
3. That Condition Plo, 2, ahove-menttoned, shall be complied wtth prior to
final huilding and zoning inspections.
4. That the proposed use is granted for a period of three (3) years,
subject to revie~ nd consideration for possible extens(ons o` time by the Planntng
Commission upon written request of the petitioners. if it is determined that the uses
have not had an adverse impact on surrounding land uses,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commtssion does hereby
find and detcrr~ine r.hat adoption of this Rasolution fs expressly predicated upon
applicant's comp)iance aaith each and all of the conditions heretnabove set forth.
Shouid any such condition, or any part thereof, be derlared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competenr jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void,
TI~E FOREGOIPJG RESOLUTIOtJ is signecl and approved hy me this ?nd day of June,
19a0.
~Lk (~,.-.._ /~ ~~~....a.~
ATT[ST: ~~ ~ 7 CHF11 R~rlOMA"!, AtIANE I M C 1 TY PLANN I NG COMH I SS 1011
S ~ TY-P' ~ C'6F , ~ ~ ~
-2- PC£30-91
STATE OF CALIFOR~IA )
COUNTY OF OR/aNGE ) ss.
CITY OF !1~lAHEIM ;
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahelm City Plar:ning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoin~ resolution o~as passed and aciopted at a r~eeting of
the Anahetm City Plannina Commission held on June 2, 19L'0, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COM-IISSIOrJERS: E3ARNE5, BUSNORE, DAVID, FPY, KI~IG, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIOPlERS: NONE
A[iSENT: COMMISSIOPIERS: HERBST
I!I WITtJESS 41NEREOF, I have i~ereunto set my hand this 2nd day of June, 1980.
_ `~~ .~ ~~~ ..
SECR~TARY, APJAfiE I M C ITY PLANM 1 tIG COt1M I SS I ON
-3- PC9~-~1