PC 81-115RF.SOLUTION P10. PC31-11 i
A RESOLUTIOPJ OF THE ANAhIEIP1 CITY PLAP~NI"I~ COMMISSIOP!
THAT PETITIO~J FOR CO~IDITIO~JAL USE PERMIT ~10, 27_~7 RE GRAtdTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commis~ion did receive a vPrificd
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from ORA!!GF CUUNTY WATFR DISTRtC7, P, 0. Box
8300, Fountain Valley, California, °2708, o~Nner, and C. L. PHA?RIS SAPID & GRAVEL
IIJC., 2£i5~F North Santiago Boulevard ;'200, Orange, Cal (fornia ~)7(F7, ~c~ent, of certa~n
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Grange, State of California,
desr_ribed as:
That portion of Lots 23 and 24 in Block 3( of the Yorba Linda
Tract as per Map recorded in Bool: S, pages 17 and 18 of
Pliscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, located ln the City
of F~nahelm, County of Orange, 5tate of Caltfornia, descrihed as
fellows: Beginnfng at the centerline tntersection of La Palma
Avenue and Rich`ield R.oad; thence along said center'ine of
Richfield Road S. 0° il'32" E. 17;7.,92 feet to tf~e True Point of
Beginning; thence S, 89° ~,£3~i$~~ W, ~$5.41~ feet; thence N, 0°
11'32" L•!. 117.4o feet; th~nce S. 89° 4~i'iFi" W, 33'1 feet, more or
1ess; the~ce. S. (; 11'32" E. 490 feet, more or less; thence N, 6~!°
30'00" F. 570 feet, more or less, to its intersectlon ti•~ith the
centerline of said Richfield Road; thence along said centerline N.
0~ 11'32" W. 120 feet, more or less, to the True Point of
Eieginning.
WHERFAS, the City Plan~,ing Commission did schedule a pubtic hearing at the
City Hail in the City of Araheim on Piay 1E, 1981, at i:3n p,m,, notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by l~w and in accordance with the
provislons of the Anaheim Nunicipal Code, Chapter 1?,^3, to hear and consider
evidence for and aqainst said prcposed c~nditional uc~ ncPr+Tt ~~~ r.. ~
make Tindings and recommendations, in connection therewith• said ^ y~~jy`~~ rJ~~u
beer. continued to the Planning Commission meeting of June~l, 1a8j~;~a~d hearing having
WHEREAS, said Commission after due inspection, invastigation and study made
by itse!f and in its behaif, and after due consideratiorr of all evEdence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for v~hich a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18,f13,~3n,p~(i to wit: to
permit a portable concrete hatch plant in the RS-q-43,OOQ(SC)
(Residential/Agrtculturat - Scenic Corridor Overlay) Z.one.
2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in ~~~hich it is proposed to be l~cated,
3. That the size and shape of the site pr.»osed for the use is adequate to
ailow the full development of the proposed use i~ a manner not detrimental to the
particuiar area ~or to the peace, health, safety, a~d generai ~~elfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
PCf31-115
4. That tlie granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the condittons
imposed, i` any, wiil not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5, That the traffic generated hy the proposed use ~•rill not impnse an undue
burdcn upon the streets and highorays designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
6. That no one indicated their ~resence at said puhllc hea-ing in
opposltion; and tnat no correspondenc~ ~das received in opnositton to the subject
petiti~n.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FIPlDIMG: That the ~naheim Cit~i Planniny Commission has
reviewed the proposal to permit a portahle concrete hatch plant in the RS-A-
43,000(SC) (Residential/Agricultural ° Scenic Corrldor Overlay) Zone ort an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 3.~' acres, havinq a
frontage of approximately 120 feet on the ~~iest side of Rlchfield Roacl, approximately
t75o feet south of the centerline of La Palma Avenue; and does herehy approve the
Plegative Deciaration from the requirement to nrepare an =nvironmental impact report
on the bssis that there would be no siqr,ificant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaratlon since the
Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for general industrial land uses
ccmmensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive envi~onmental lmpacts are involved
in the preposal; that the Initial Study suhmitted by the ~etitioner indicates no
signiTicant individual or cumulative adverse environmentai impacts; and that the
I~egative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on fiie in the City of
Anaheim Planning Department.
N041, THEREFORF, BE IT RESOLVED thaY the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does liereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general v~elPare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
i_ Th~r hagAd ~n n~~~jA~r~~1 rr~ir!. :,nd v~hi~~~l?~ tr~ffi^_ t~ an~l fr~m snhiect
site, the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic sianal assessment fee
(Ordinance No. 3£396), in an amaunt as determined by the City Council, for a 10,00~-
square foot commercial building.
2. That subject property shall be develope~i suhstanttally in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit ~lo. 1.
3. That subject property sha~l be comolPtely enclosed and site-screened
from adjoin?ng properties and Richfield Road hy a~-foot high chain-link fence
entirely i~terwovcn with redwood or cedar slats.
4. That subject batch ~lant operation shall be limited to a maximum of six
ready-mix trucks with a maximum of four (4) loads of co~~crete per day, aer truck,
5. That the proposed use shall he conducted durina normal husiness hours
wtT.h a maximum of 7 employees on-site at any one time.
-2- PC81-115
7. That the proposed use shall Fe limited to ~ne (1) ~ortable batchinq
vehicle and that any increase in tnr, number or type of such equipment (including
additional ready-mix trucks) shall be suh;ect to revie~•~ and approval by the Planning
Commission at the request of the petitioner.
8. That Condition tlos. 1, 2 and 3 shal' be completed prior to the
commencement of any acttvities.
~ That suhject use is approved for a period of one (1) year, ti•~ith further
axtensions~of time su6ject to review and anproval hy Plannirig Commission ~o determine
if the proposed u,e has i~een detrimental to surrounding properties.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planninc~ Commissfon does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is ex~ressly predlcated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condit~on, or any part i:hereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the finai judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void,
1981.
THE FOREGOIFJG RESGLUTIOPJ is sianed and approved by me this lst day of June,
~.~ ~,-~ v ~~.-
CHAIRMAfJ, APIAHEIM CI'f PLANNING COMM15510N
A i'TEST:
`~~ ~ ;~~-
SECRETARY, ANP.HEIM CITY PLANNING COPIMISSIOH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORAMGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIFI )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of tlie Anaheim City Planning Commiss(on, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adop?ed at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held or~ June 1, 1~1'1, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COPit11SSI0NERS: BARNES, 40LIAS, BUSIiORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIOhERS: NOPIE
AE3SENT: COM~IISSIOMERS: HONE
I~~ WITP![S5 WHEP,EOF, I have hereunto set my har.d this lst day of June, 1981.
U ~ /~i~t..r.-
SECRETARY, ~NAHEIM CITY PLANPIING COMMISSIOPJ
-3- PC81-115