PC 81-117RES(1LUT1(1td t10. PC31-117
A RESOLU i I OP+ OF TfiE /1NAN~ I!1 C I TY PLA:'l,"I I~dR CO!1~1 i SS I 0"1
THAT FETI?IOFI FOR V/1RIA"I~E t10. 3?_1`~ f3E ~R111dTF~
bJHEREAS, the Anahei^~ City Planninn Commissi~n did receive a ve~ifie~!
Petition fer Variance fron PARADISE IiIVESTHEIIT, INC., 11~ Strada Place, Anaheim,
California 923~7, o~mer of certain real property situatr.rl in the City of Anaheim,
Co~inty of Orange, State of California, descri!~ed ~~s:
Lot 5 of Tract Ido. 2633 in the Cit~i of AnaFeim, County of ~7ran9~,
State of California, as per man rec~rdeo in hool: 3~~~, paqes ~ and
7 of NiscPllaneeus Ma~s, i~ the office of tiie county recorder nf
said Orange County, California.
WHERFAS, the City Planning Conmission did hold a public hearino at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on June 1, 1~31, at 1:3~ p.m., notice of said puhlic
h~~aring having been duly given as required hy lati•~ and in acr.ordance wtth the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chant~r i",03, to hear artd consider
evidence for and against said prooosed variance ~nd to investi~ate and ma'r.e findings
and recommendations in connection therei~~ith; and
11HEREAS, said Commission, after du~ insp~ction, invr.stigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consirieration of ~il evirience and reports
offered at said 'nearing, does find and determine the folloa,ing facts:
lo That tne petitioner proposes a~.~raiver of the folloti~~ing to retain a
ground-mounted antenna:
SFfTI(lrl 1?,~1t nh9 nl~ - Pnrmirhnri qntnnn,.
Ground mounted antenna prohibite~i;
one ground-mounted antenna existinq)
2. That Che above-mentioned ~•iaiver is herehy ~ranted on the hasis that the
petitioner demonstra*_ed 'that ~ hardship exists.
3. That the requested variance is herehy gra~ted on the basis that Lhe
petitioner stipulated *_o comp'.etely screen the antenna frexn the view of adjoining
neighbors and from the street ~.ith a combination of fencing and lan~scaring ~~rhic'~
consists of trees of an adequate size to nrovide complete screening immediately.
1:. That there are ~xceptional er extraordinarv circumstances or conditions
applicabl~ to the pro~erty involved or to the intendc~d use of the property that do
not apply generally to the property or class of use in t`~e same vicinity and zone.
5. That the req~~ested variance is nrcessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a suhstantial preperty right nossesscd i~y other property in the same
vieinity and zone, ind d~=ni~d to the nroqerty in question.
G. That t5e requested varianc? ~;iil not b~ materially ~fetrimental to the
public ~~~elfare or injurious to the property er imnrovemnnts in such vicinity and zone
in aihich the property is Iocated,
PC31-117
7. That one person ~ndicated their ores~ne~ at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no corresp~r~dF~nc^ ~~~as recrived in apposi;ion to the subject
petition,
E!lVIRO~U1F.PiTAL 111P/1f,T FIPfDIiJG: 7he Planning Director or his authorized
representative has determined t'»t t'~e r,r~posed nroiect falis ~•~ithin the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class ~, as defined in the State FIR 6uidciines a_nd is,
therefore, catecorically ex^m~t from the re~uirement to prepar~ in FIP,.
tJ041, THERr"_FORE, RE iT RESULLrD that thF /lnaheir~ City Plarning Commission
does hereby arant s•:bject Petition for Variance, upon the foll~~•~ina conditions tvhich
are herehy found to be a necessary prerequisite to the ~ropnsed use of the subjeet
property in order to preserve [hc safety and genera) t•~cifare of the Citizens of the
~ity of Anaheim:
1. That suhject property shall be developed suhstantially ln accordanee
~-lith plans and specifications on fiie with tlie ~,ity of Anahein marked Exhihit No, 1,
7. That trees shall he planteci in a manner ~•~hich completely screens the
artenna from adjacent prorerties and streets.
3. TFat C~ndition hlos. 1 and 2, ahovc-mentioned, shall he completed within
a period of sixty (60) days from the date herein.
6E !T F!1RTHER RESOLVED that the ~lnaheim City Planning Commission does herehy
find and determine that adoption of this ~esol~~tion is exnressly predicaced uoon
applicant's compliance ~~ith ec.ch and all of th~ condit;ons herrinahove set forth.
Should any such condition, or ary oart thereof, he declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of cmm~etent jurisdicticm, then this R~solution,
and any appr~vals hernin contained, shall be deemr_d null and vo;d,
THE FOREGOIN~ P,[SOLUTIOt~ is siqned ancl a~prnved by ne this ist day of Jim~,
1~^7
, ~, ~ ,~
;
~,,o.~ ~~' ; ~.~
CHAIKrtAPI, A~JAHEIM CITY PLA.MNIHG COM11!SSIQt!
ATTEST:
_ `~~ .~° ~/~~.
SEC~ ~HrtY, Ar7 :~,H CITY PLANtdI~IG COM!415SIOPJ
~~ PC81-117
STATF OF CAL I FOF;D! IFl )
COUtdTY OF ORAWG[ ) ss.
CITY OF AIJAHElFt i
~, Ed1th L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim Citv Planning Commission, do
herehy certify thaC the fo;e,oina resolution o-,as passed and adoptecl at a meeting ofi
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on June 1, 19%?1, hy the follo~~ing vote of
the memhers thereof:
AYES: COMrqIS510MEP,S: BARt~IES, BOU/1S, BUSHOR~, FRY, HERRST, I;IPIG, T~LAR
MOES: COMMISSIOidERS: NONE
ABSENT: COt4MISSIONERS: ~JOh1E
I tl WITtlESS WFIEREOF, I have hereunto set my ha~d th i s t st day of June, 1981 ,
/; c~.c-~ ,Z~ %~-~F.2~t.,,~.~.
SECRETARY, AFIAHE IH C I i Y PLANr! I MG C~?4M I SS I(1M
-3- PC~'1-t17