PC 81-149RESOLUTIO?I Np, PC31-1~~'~
A RESOLU; 10"! OF TIIE Fl'lAHEI`1 CITY PLl1H'!I~If, C~tt!11~51~"!
TNAT PETITIO~! F~R C~tJDITIONAL I~SE PERHfT PJ~, 27.1n BE r,nq~~T~~~ ~~~ PppT
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Pianning Commission did recelve a verified
Petitton for Conditional Use Permit from R~SA h1AP,Y CASELLl1 ULIV( ANf1 AM9FL~ CASELLA~
2124 East Valley Glen Lane, Orange, California, 92cb7, cwners, and PATRICY, J, DAkR
AND JULIA R. DARR, 3~93 tast 11iraloma, Anaheim, California 97.3~~7, agent, of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Caltforr.ia,
described as:
A portlon of Lot 7, ~locF~ 5, of the Golder State Tract, sho~•m as
Parcel h, of Parcel Maps, 3004: 5~, P~g~ ~~~ Official P,ecords ef
Orange County, California.
I~:HE:EtiS, tl~~e City Planning Commtssion did sche~lule a ~ublic hcaring at the
City Hall in the City of Anaheim on June 15, i9B1 , at 1:3~~ p.m., notice of said
public Fearing havinq heen duly given os required hy la~~ and in accordance ti~iith the
provisions of tne Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 13.^3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use ~ermit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection there~•~iCfi; s~id public hearing havinq
been continued to the Planning Commission mee:in~ of ,lu1v 13, 1~E1; and
!JHEREAS, said Commtssion after due inspection, investination and study made
by itself and in its hehalf, anrl ,fr..~ .+„~ ~r.,.,__.
cffered at said hearing, does find and determine the folloo-~tng'facts.nce and reports
i. That the prooosed use is pronerly one ror o-~hich a conditional use
permit is auChorized by Araheim Munlcipal Code Section In.(1.'~5n,pr,~ ~g,(,~,~5~.5p3.
and 13.61.050.G01, to a~it: to rctair, an existing auto detail facility and permit
auto sales and truck stora.;;; in the ML (Industrial, Limited) Zo~e with the folloo-ring
waiver:
SECTION 1R.G1,p63,011 - Minlmum landscaped sethack.
50 eet required;
12 and 11F feet existing)
2. That the proposed use is herFhy granted, in part, to permit the
automobile detailing facility and truck storage in the ML (Industrial, Limited) Zone
and denying the requested used automobile sales on the basis that the slze of the
Pr~perty is not adequate to accommodate all the proposed usES and on the hasis that
it is located on one of the heaviest traveled ,.orners in the northeast industr~al
a rea .
3. That the ~roposed use is herehy c~ranted, in part, P~r a period of one
year subject [o review upon Y:ritten request from [he petitioncr t~ determinr_ if the
use has had a detrimental effect on the area.
PC81-ih9
4. That the approved truck, storage shail consist for two automobile
transport carriers to he stored behind t.'ie existing fencc at the reir of the
property.
5. That the reyun_str_d i~~aiver is hereFy grantecl, in part, to ~ermlt thc
existing canopy and pum~ ;sland located 14 feet from the south ~ronerty line adjacent
to 141raloma Avenur on the hasis that the existing canopy is attached to the main
structure; and denyina the reeuest for an ^-foot h(gh inten•~oven chafnlink fence
propo;ed to be located 12 feet from the east property itne adjacent to Y,raemer
Qoulevard on the basis t~-at no hardship ~ias demonstrateri pertainlnq to the size,
shape, topegra~hy of suhject Pr-operty.
~• That the proposed use, as granted, ~;~iil not adversely affect the
adjoin(ng land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it Is
proposed to be 'ncated.
is adequate toThjto`rti~e f~~~ ded`lopment~ ofe t~ie~ ~'renosed for the use, as granted,
detrimental to the particular area nor to the pr~~OSed u~c (n a manner not
welfare of the Citizens of the City of ,q~~,tie~,-,~ PEace, healt., safety, and ~eneral
n. That the granting of the Conditionai Use Pernit un.ler the conditions
imposed, if any, ~,~(i) not be detrimental to the peace, he3)th, s~fety and general
welfare of the Ci[izens or the City of Anahein.
9• That the traffic generated by the prooosed use, as granted, will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and hi9h~Jays designed and improved to carry
the traffic in the area.
I ~ T~. . ,
~-• ~~~~~ nu one indicateJ their Fresence at said publ(c hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence ~~~as received in opposition to the subject
petit~on.
EN6'IRONME~JTAL IMPACT FIFJDitlG; ihat the Anaheim City Planning Cor,gnission has
reviea~ed ~he proposal to perr~it a~ automobile detail facllity wtth automobile sales
and truck storage in the ML (Industria), Linlted) 7_one with waiver of m(ntmum
landscaped setback on a rectanqularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately ~.( acre located at tfie north~~est corner of .Miraloma Avenue and Kraemer
Boulevard (2092 East htiraloma Avenue); and does hereb a
Declaration f~~ the requlrement to pre~are an environmentalpPm~ve the Negative
~asls tliat there a~ou~d he no significant individual ~r ~~ct report on the
environmental impact ~iuc to the a ~~~ulative adverse
Anahetm General Plar dr_siqnates the suhPecta, °t this PJeqative Declaration sir,ce Yhe
commensurate with the oroposal; that no senPitivetenvirnnmental impactsiare,invol~ved
in the proposa); that the Initial Study su6mitted by the pet(tioner indicates no
significant ir~dividual or cumulative adverse environmental im~acts; and that the
~'egattve ~eclaration suostantiatinn the foregoln~ findinns is on *ile in the City of
Anaheim Planning De~artment,
°2-
PC81-149
NUIJ, THEREFOP,E, BE IT r',ESOLVFO that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does herehy qrant, in part, suhj~~ct Petition for Conditional I!se Permit, upon the
follovling conditfons o-rhich are herehy found to be a necessary ~rerequisite *_o the
proposed use of the subject ~roperty in order to preserve the safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That all automohile detailing and stor~nc sf~all he confined to the
interior of Lhe buildiny or shall b~ ~roperly enclosed hy fencina, in comoliance with
the Zoning Code,
2. That the existinn structure snall be hro~ight up to the minimum
standards of the City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Duilding, Plumbing,
Electrical, Hechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by tha City of Ar,aheim.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance t~~ith approved
pians on fite o-iith the Office of the Executive Director of P~~hlic Worb,s.
4. That subject properry shall ne developed suhstantially in accardance
with plans and specifications on file ti~ith the City af Anah~im marked [xhihit No, i;
provided, lio~~ever, that there shall not be anv chainlinl: fencino within rhP fifty
($0) foot setback from Y,raemer Boulevard to the east.
;. That Condition Ilos. 2, 3, and 4, above-m~ntloned, shall be comf~lied
~vith prior to final huildinG and zonin~ inspactions.
BE IT FURTHFP, RESOLVED that the Anaheim City ~lannin~ Comnission does hereby
find and deternine _hat adoption of this Reso)ution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance :rith each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any sucii condition, or any part thereoT, he declared invalicf or unenForceable
1... wl... f.! ~1 _r
~, ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ja~yr:~~r~ ~~ ~ny :,.,uri ui cvino~[~ni jurisdic[ion, then th15 Resolutlon,
and any approvals herein contained, shall he deemed null and ~mid,
THE F'OREGOIPlG RESOLUTIOhI is si~ned and anproued hy re t~is 13th day of July,
19E1.
ATTEST•
~a~- R . ~ ~~
CHA i RNAN, AHANE I ~1 C 1 TY PLFPIH I Plr, CQ~1!~ I SS I ON
~~~ ~ ~~.
SECRETARY, Ar1ANEIM CITY PI.Atl~JINr, CG~1"ISSIOr1
-3- PC8t-t4~
STATE OF Cl1L I FOR~J I A )
COU~dTY OF ORAIdGF ) ss.
CITY OF A~JANEIM )
I, Edith L. Narris, Secretary of tne Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoinq resolution ':17$ passed and adopted at _a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planr,ing Commission held on July 13, 1~~1, by the fo)lotving vote of
the members thercof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: J~1R!lES, B01)A$~ FRY, hI~R~ST, ~:IF1G
NOES: C014M15510"JERS: ~3USHORF
ABSENT: COMMISSIOP!ERS: TOLAR
it! 411TNESS ~~/hIEREOF, t have heraunto set rny hanJ this 13th day of July, 1~81.
~
r~ ~ ~
SECRETARY, ANAHEI~1 CITY Pl.p,~~!~~Nr rn~nM~SSlQM
~fi~ PC81-149