PC 81-176RESOLUTIOtI "l0. PCnI-17~.
A R[SOLUTIOF! OF THE A'IAHE1~1 CITY P[.~tlNltlf. C0.'1'115S10:!
THAT PETITIOiI FOR lf/1RIFl~ICE r1o. ;2z3 BE GRl1'ITFD, IN PAP.T
WHEREAS, the llnaheim City Planning Commission did r~c^ive , verified
Petition for Variance from SHIRISH fi. PATEL, ET AL, 1(04 South Harbor Go~.~lr~~ard,
~nah~im, California 92;~(1'L, o~~mers, and V/1"J DOP,PE F~SS^CIATFS, 1;?~1 Orangewocd
Avenue, ,;in7, Oran9e, Califcrnia ~2(-.i3, aqent, of certain re~~l property situated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Oranye, State of California descrined as:
THAT POFTIOt! OF TIiE hlORTHVEST QUARTER OF TF![ SOUTHFAST QUAP.TEk OF
SEC710N 2?., IN TO'~lNSFIIP 4 SOLTII, R,~I~1GE t~ 41E~T, SA'J BERPIAP,Di!!0
DASE ANO MERIDIAtI, D[SCRI3ED AS FOLLOIIS: BE61t~~!!!IG AT A POII:T I"
THE '~JEST LINE Of TNE SOUTHEAST QUA2TER OF SAID ~[CTI0~1 7_?_, SAID
POIP~T DEIrJr, LOCATED G39•2(-, FEET SOUTN o° 1h' s~" EAST FZOM THF
CENTER OF SA I D SECTI ON 2?., SA I D CEtJTER PO I tlT 13E I`1G TfiE CENTER L('!E
nF CERRITOS AVEPlLE FR~M TIIE WEST WITH THE N~RTFI A"!D SniiTH QUARTF?
SECTIOtJ LItJE OF SAID SECTIOW 22; TH[~lCE ~~ORTFI ~O° 5>' 3`~" EAST
660.75 FEET TO A 1-INCiI IR~~i PIPE; AS SN01•!Id Otl /1 HAP OF SUf,tIEY
RECORDED ItJ E001: 15, PAGE 4 RECORD OF SURVEYS, i~! TNF OFrICE OF
7HE COU,dTY RFCOR~ER OF SAID COU~aTY; THEPICE SOUTH ,1° lk' '~5" [AST
1(,j,t~0 f GLT ^,LO~+G TH~ S01!TttERLY EY,TE!i5 i ON OF A~!D THC F~.ST L I ~!E OF
TNE NORTHtJEST QUAI;TEf; UF THt 'tiu'.Tni;ES7 QUARTF° OF TH[ SOUTHEAST
QUA2TER OF SAID SECTIOt! 2?; THE~lCE SOUTN :i^° j5' 3^" ti!EST C.~~,77
FEET TO A POINT IW THE SAID IJ~ST LI~iE OF THE ShUTFiE11ST QUF,RTER OF
5[C71011 22; TIIEr1CE :~O~TH ~~° 1t~~ 3~~~ 41cST 1'","!^ F~~T T~ TI1E P01'IT
OF QE~I~;t~lt~r.
IJFIEREAS, the City Plar~niny Commission did hold a public heai-ina at the Civic
Center in t1~e City of Anaheim on August 10, 13~1, at 1:3^ p.n., notic•~ of said public
h~,f;.,~ ti,v~nn he.en duiv ciiven as rectuired hy la~~> >nd in acco~dance with the
provisions of the Ana!ieim Municipal Code, Chapter 1:~.^3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed variance and to +nvestigate and maF;e findings
and recomnsndations in connection there~•~ith; said public hearing having been
continued to the Piannt~9 Commission mceting of Au9ust 24, 1~`il; and
4lfiERE~S, said Commission, after due inspection, investiaation and study nade
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all eviclence and reports
offered at said hcaring, does find ar,d determine the following fac*.s:
1, t the petitioner preposes r~aivers of t'~e follo~•iing to expand an
existing motel:
(A) SECTIOi! 13,QG.Ob0.021~3 - Mlnimum number of ~+arl<inq spaces.
55 spaces required; 3~1 spaces proposed)
(3) SFCTIOi; 13.0;,093.~21 - hlaximum numher of freestanding sinns.
1 freestandin9 si9n permitted;
? reest~ndino si~ns ~rn~osed)
~C) 5EC7tOt! ~~.u;.(193.023 - Permitted location of fraest~ndinu signs.
(36 feet from nort~ property line required;
0 feet pro~osed)
PCf3'-17E
~D) S[CTION '~.05.0'?3.0?_31 -~linimur~ distancc bet~~~e::n frecstandinq siqns.
(3~?~ feet required; 3~~ feet proposed)
2. That the above-mentione<1 t•iaiver (,A) is hc~'~hy yrantecl, in part, on the
basis ti~at the petitionr_r stipulated at the p~;hlic hearinn to providing not less than
67.G of thc required parl;ing spaces (3% spa ~ for the pmposed expansion); and that
the waiver is nereby 9ranted on the basis th~_c a certain p^rcentage of guests arrive
by transportation modr; o*_her than privnte automohile.
3. That the above-mentioned ~:iaivcrs ([3), (C)and (D) are herehy granted on
the basis that the specific parcel on i~~hicn the motel is located does not have street
frontage on Harbor Bouievard and tliereforc, any street oriented si9ns must be located
off-site on an other~iise developed ~~arcel; and that the ;-~aivers are hereby 9ranted on
the basis of tFie size and ;hape of the property.
4. That there are exceptional or er,traordinary circumstanccs or conditions
appllcable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do
not app!y generally [o the property or class of use in the sane vicinity and zone.
5. That the reyuested variance, as nranted, is necrssary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a suhstant~al oroperty right oossessed hy other
pronerty in thc samc vicinity and zonc, and denied to t'ie properfy in ouestion.
~~. That tne requested variance, as nrant~d, ~~il) no[ bc materially
detrimental to the pui,lic ~:ielfare or injurio~:s to the property or inorovements in
such vicinity and zon~ in t~hich the pr~oertv is incated.
7. That no one indieated their ;,re~sence at said ?ublic hearing in
~pposition; and that no correspondence ~::as receiv~d in onoositi~n t~ the subject
petition,
ENVIRn~~rfENTAL II1?ACT FItJDIlIG: That the Ma~~ein Cit~~ Plannin~ (.ommisslon has
r~+V ir~t~rr(i thP nrnryqcn 1 rn nnrmi r rtin ..v~,.,c i r,.. .,f . ..1 y.~t .~. , nr~. ,.F
minimurn numh~.P Or park~in9 snaces, naximum nur~hc`f of1 freestandi~g siqn5, Pef1T11ttP.d
location of freestanding signs and minimum distance het~•~een freestandino signs on a
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approrimately 1.21i acres, and
naving a frontage of 90 feet on tlie east sidP of Harbor doulevard (1~~4 South Harbor
Doulevard); a~d does herehy approve the ~7e~ative ~eclaration fron the requirement to
prepare an ~nvironmental impact report on the I:asis that there a~ould be ~o
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental in~~act rlue to the approval
of thls Negative Declaration since C`~e Anaheim General Plan desinnates the subject
property for co~xnercial recreation land uses conmensurate ~•~ith the ~roposal; that no
sensitive environmental impacts are involved 1n tlie uroposal; that the Initial Study
su~mitted Ly the pecitioner indicates no si9nificant individual or cumulati~e
adverse environmental impacts; and that the Neqative Declaration substantiatina the
foreyoing findings is on file in the City of Anahein Planninq Deoarte+ert.
tlOlJ, THEREFi~RE, BE IT RfSOLVED th~t t:~e Anaheim l.ity Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject ictition for ~/ariance, upon the folla~;in~ conditions o-~iiich
are hereby found to be a necessary prere~uisite to [he proposed use of the subject
pro~erty in orcler to pr;•serv,^_ the ~afet'y ind ~ener,il ~velfare of the Citizrns of the
C i ty of Analie ir~:
-7" PC81-17b
1. That Crash storagr areas shall be provide~ in accordance ~:rith approved
plans on file ~~rith the UfFice of tiie Executive Dirr..ctor of f'ubiic IJork.s.
2, ThaC fire hydrants s'iall be installed and charged as required and
deter~iined to be n^cessary by t~ie Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement
of structural framing.
3. That the ormer(s) of suhiect property shall pay t~ the City of Anaheim
a fee, in an amaunt as deternined i~y the City Council, for street liyhting along
blaruor Boulevard.
4. That the o~~mer(s) of suhject property shall pay the traffic sianal
ass~ssment fee (Ordinance tdo. 3396) in ar amount as determined by the City Council,
for commercial buildings pr(or to the issuance of a building ~ermit.
5. That this Variance is grar,ted subjer_t to the corypletion of
Recl3ssification Plo. 66-67-oi, no~r pending.
G. ThaC subject property shall be cieveloped substantinily in accordance
with plans and specificatio~~s on file i•~ith the City of Anaheim marked [xhtbit fdos. t
and 2, as revised, to provide additior~l parking totalling not less than (7:0 of the
number of spaces required by Code. The revised p)ans shall be submitte~! to the
Planning Department for app;•ovai, I:itchen eificiency units may be installed in no
more tFan 25% of the units, t•~ith a maximum of G-cubic foot refrigerators; t~~o-hurner
stoves, excluding oven and bal<ing facilities; and sinc~le compartment sinE:s; except
tnat the manager's unit ~•~ill be allo~ved to have full kitchen facilities.
7. That Condition ~lo. 3, abov~-rnentioned, shall he complied with prior to
the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the
time that the buildin~ permit is issued, or within a period of one year from date
hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commission may
grant.
3. That Condition tdos. 1 and 6, above-mention~d, shall he complied o-~ith
prior to final buildiny and zoning inspectio~s.
QE IT FURi'HER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commissio~ does hereby
find and determina that the adoption GT this Reso~ution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's co~~pliance ~•~ith each and all of the conditions here~nabove set forth.
Should any condition or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable hy the
final judgment of any court of conpetenY jurisdic~ion, tlien this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, shall bP deemed nuli and void,
THE FORFGOING RESOLUTIOPI is signed and anproveci by me this 24th day of
August9 19$1.
ATTEST:
///~ ~~
~ lJL~I~ ~ .
~CT~~ARY, At~AHEIM C;TY PLAMNI G^CO~dMI5SI0~d
~~ ~~j
H. RM M .0 TEHPORE ~
i
NNANE IM C ITY PLAMN I"JG CQfF4^f(SS I ON
-~- PCB1-17E
STAT[ 0~ CFlL I FORPJ IA )
COUNTY OF ORF,NGf_ ) ss.
CITY UF ANAHL-IM )
I, Edit!-i (_. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Plarnfng Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution t•~as passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission heid on August 24, 19^ul, at 1:3~ p.m., by the
folloi~~ing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: 6ARNE5, BOUAS, FRY, HERBST, KING, T~LAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOWE
ABSENT: COF1MlSSIONERS: BUSHOP,t
IP! WITtJE55 41NEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2f~th day of Au~ust, 19~1.
~i~ ~1 ~~~~
SECRETA'Y, ANAHE I M C ITY PL/1MP! I ~If COHM I SS I OM
-h- PCS1-17~