PC 81-209RESOLUTION N0. PC81 -209
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2266 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from NORTH AMERICAN INVESTMENTS, 1940 North
Tustin Avenue, #100, Orange, Calfioonia 92665, owner, and SATSUKI HAMAYA,,2424
West Ball Road, 112, Anaheim, California, 92804, agent, of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California;
described as:
PARCELS 1 TO 4 INCLUSIVE, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 148, PAGES 8
AND 9 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on September 21, 1981, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; said public hearing having
been tontinued to the Planning Commission meeting of October 5, 1981.
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44.050.010 to wit: to
permit on -sale beer and wine in an existing restaurant.
2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
PC81 -209
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning L,rector or his authorized
representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is,
theretore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner(s) of subject property shall submit a letter requesting the
termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 224 to the Planning Department.
ATTEST:
1981.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1 and 2.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
3. That Condition No. 1, above -ment
commencement of the activity autho
the time that the building permit
from date hereof, whichever occurs
Planning Commission may grant.
ioned, shall be complied with prior to the
rized under this resolution, or, prior to
is issued, or within a period of one year
first, or such further time as the
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 5th day of
October, 1981.
- 4,4a ,.° ,1/1.A.�
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM C COMMISSION
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANIIING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on October 5, 1981, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
BARNES, BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, KING, TOLAR
NONE
HERBST
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of
� ha'
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
P081 -209
October,