PC 81-217. L
RcSOLUT1011 (!0, PCuI-?.17
~ RESOLU"i0;1 pF TIIE ~!lF~HFltq CITY PLAfJFllllr; ~~~~;;~c~~nr~
TI1AT PFTIT17~1 F~1~ Cor!nlTlrni~,L U~E PER'11T '~f), ?~?n ,r.,E prtl~c~
W~IEREAS, ~he Anal~eim City P)anning Conmission dfd receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Pernit from Rn,a,EpT bl. I;HITE A'lfl JA~1FT "1, k/HITF_, f2~(,
North 3rooF;hurst Street, Flnaheim, Cal i fnrnia, =??~~~ f o~•mers, and JAY IU~lfP,Y,
PIETROPOLITAhI OUTl100R ADVERTISI~IG, 100G-G ~:/est Fluntinnton Drive, 4rcadia, Ca)ifor~ia
~range, SL-ate offCalifornia,'lescrPbede35Y situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
THE SOUTH 21Fc3.3~ ~[[T OF TF{[ b![ST 't~l,,~~ F~FT OF T~!F ~IOF',TH 15
ACP.ES QF TI1E SOUTIIl:EST OUARTER ~F THE 'JORTHI!EST OUA"TFC OF SE^,TI0~1
II, TOblilSHIP 4 SOUTN, RAtJGE 1~ 4/EST, I~f TIIE Rq^JCNp Lf15 Cny~TFS, q~
PER MAP RECOi~~ED IhJ BOOF; ~1, pq~[' ~^ OF F1ISCELL/1P![OUS ~1APS, II1 THE
OFFIC[ UF Tf!E COUtlTY RFCO(',DER OF SAID COU"JTY, EXCEPT T~IAT Pf1~TI0td
THEREOF DESCP,I3ED Itd TNE DEE~ TO TFIE ST.4TE OF CALIFnnr~~q~ rF~~r~E~
~dARCH 21;, 1n55 II1 QOOY, 300(, PAr,E 3,~3 OF p~FICIAL R~COr?~c.
41NEREAS, the City Planning Commission di~i ~+e1d a p,~h~ic 'riearinc~ at the City
f~a~~ ~~ the City of Ananeim on Octoher 19, 1~31, at 1:3r1 p.~;,, notice of said public
hearing having been duly giv.r.n as required by )ai~~ an~1 in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim t4unicipal Code, Chapter 1'~,,n3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said prnposed conditional use perr~it and to investigate and
ma1;e findings and re.:ommendations in connection t`iere~•iith; anri
WHFREAS, said Comnission, after due inspection, investinatior, and st~dy ma~e
by itself and in its hehalf, ancl after due consideration of all evidence and reports
of`ered at said hearing, do~s find and determir.r, the fo11o~,.,jrr~ fartc•
~. That tlie propc,sed use is
permit is authorized hy Anaheim Municipal Code~~Sectio~n~1~~(,~~~n~;~r.~~~nCOnditionai use
pernit a biliboard in the h1L (Industr' ~ t~ w1t•
(A) SECTiO;d 1°,~,,11i
~e} S[CTlO~! ti.n5.112.02~J
(C) SECTIO'! ;u.05.i1G.O20
~ 'a , L~mited) Zone ~iit!i ~•raivers pf: ' to
Permitted iocation.
bi116oards permitted within ?i)~ feet of an
arterial highway intersection and no closer than
75 feet from a residential structure;
`~'~'~ tc~et from an arterial intersection and
3~-F~~m a residential structure proposc~d)
- Maximum size
~~~ S feet
-,---~~ permi ttc~d;
~7:.. square feet proposeci)
Haximum hei~ht.
7_7 fee~ permitted ~.,ithin 3^'~ f~et
of a residential structure;
~~~ f__nt proposed)
PC81-21]
2. That the petitioner did not demonstrate that a hardship er.ists and that
approval could set an undesirabie ~recedent for oversized biilf.~oarcls and hillhoards
located too close to residential structures.
3. That the proposed use ~•~ill adversely affect the adjolninr, land uses and
the growth and develapment of the area in ~•~hich it is preposed to be loczted.
~+. That tL•e size and shape of the site aro~osed 'or the use is not
adequate to alloia the full development of the propnsed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to th~ peace, health, sarety, and general
welfare of the Citizens o` the City o` Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit will be detrimental to
the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
G, That the traffic generated b; the proposed use :,~ill impase an undue
burden upon the streets and high4lays designed and improved to carry the trarric in
the area.
7. That no one indicated their presence at said puhlic hearina in
opposition; ancl tiiat no correspondence ~•aas receive:f in opposition to the subject
petition.
E~~VIROPlHFPdI',:L IItPl1CT FINDItI~; The Planning Director or his aut!~orized
representative has deternined that thr proposed pro,ject falis ~~~ithin the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 11, as defined in the State EIR fuidelines and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an FI.°..
tlOW, TIlE~EFORE, EE iT R[SOLVED that the Anaheim l'.ity Planning Commission
uoes hereby deny subject Petitiun for Conditional t!se Permit on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE i'OREGOIPdG RESOLUTI0~1 is signed and approved by mr. this l~th day of
October, 1931. ~
f ._-----
~ FIAI h1A I PRO TEHPORE
AP!AHEIM CIT1' PLA~IMiNG CO~iHiSSIOPI
ATTEST:
~~i~u~~i/n! ~~~~
SECRETARY PRO TEMPORE
At~AHE It1 C ITY PLANtI I i1G CO?iM I SS I OPI
-?- PC&1-217
STATE JF CAIIFORWIA )
COU~lTY OF ORA~dGE ) ss.
C ITY OF Flt:AIIE ~Pt )
I, Pamela H, Starnes, Secretary Pro Tempore of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution aias P855P.CI and adopted at
a meeting of the Anaheim Ci*..y P)anning Commission held on October 19, 1q81, at 1;30
P.m., by the folloi~ing vote of the memhers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIOrdERS: DOUAS, Fr,Y, l:IPJr,, TOLAR
hJOES: C011MISSIONERS: NRiJE
ABSENT: COMMISSIOtJEnS: BAF;tJES, FUSHORE, HE^[3ST
!tJ WIiPlESS l1HERE0F, I have hereunto set my hand this l~th day of October, ?981,
1'"~ /Q / i(1l. ~iyi~l~-
SECRETlIRY PRO TEF~POFE
APIAfiEIM CITY PL/1t9P:1~1~ COMM~SSiOt!
r3- PCf3t -217