PC 81-46`tESOLUTIOI! '10, PC~I-~t',
E~ R[SOLUT I ON OF THE AllAIIE I~1 C i TY PLA,Pihl I tlf; CO!±~1 I~5 I ~~I
TH~T PETIT17rl F~R CO~IDIT10~.1/1L USE P[R~tIT td0. %17? GE G"^1~TED
i•~~{E~EAS, the lnaheim City Planninn Commission clid receive a vcrified
Petition for Conditional Use Pcrr,it from TfIF TAPPA'I ~n~qpquy~ t~~l~~ East La Palma
Avenue, Anaheim, California, ~2%nj, o~mer, and SN/1~:.' Ar!p TALF'OT, 13!~' Avocado Street,
tJ~~•i~~rt L3eaci~, ~aiifornia 9266~, anent, of certain real property ~ituated in the City
of Flnaheim, County of Orange, Statc of California, describerl ~S:
Parcel 2, in the City of Anaheirn, Ce~nt~~ o` Oran~e, StaCe of California, as
shoofn on a map in booi: 25, naqe 1~ of Farcel Ma~s, records of Oran~~ County,
Caiifornia.
~JH[REAS, the City P)anning f,ommission did hoid a puhlic hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of ~lnaheim on February 23, 1~1~31, at 1;3~ p.~ „ notice of said
pubiic hearing havinq been duly given as reGuired hy 1a~., and in accordance ~•~ith the
provisions of the Anaheim ~1unic;pal Code, Ch~pter 1~,n3, to hear and consider
ev~dence for and against said proposed conditionai ucP ner^+it and t~ investi~ate and
iaake findings and recommendations in connection there~.aith; ~ncl
41HERE/1S, said Commission, after due inspection, investi9ation and study made
bY itse]f and in its ~ehalf, and after due cc,nsideration c,f ~11 ?vidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the fol'ot•~inn facts:
1, That the proposed use is pronerly one for ~•rhfch a conditional use
permiL is authorized hy Anaheim Municipai Code Section 1R,n3,n~~,~1~' to wit: to
permit a 13-lot, 12-unit industrial complex ti~ith a ~•raiver of:
SECTIOt! ~?,~1,1j~ - f;equired lot frontaae.
(f111 lots required to front on
a puhlic street or ailey;
private street frontane orc~oosA~ij
?., That the proposed use is hereby granted s~ahject to the petitioner's
St~P~latio~ at the public hearing that there shall be no retail or office uses in
this industrial complex.
3. That the requested ~-~aiver is hereby gr~nted on the basis th~t deni<1
would deprive subJe~t pronerty ef a ~rivilege enjoyed by other properties in the same
zone and vicinity.
4. That the pronosed use ~•~ill not adverscly affer_t tFe adioininq land uses
and the grot•rth ~~d ~~velopment of the area in ~•~hich ~t is pro~osed to be loeate~l.
5, That the size and slia~e of the site prooosed fnr the us~ is adequate to
a>>~ti'+ the full development of the oro~~o;ed use in a rr~anner not detrimental to tne
particular area nor to the Feice, health, safety, and general t•,elfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim,
PC ° 1-li,~,
~>. That thc c;ran t i r~i r~f thc ~ond i t i ~n,~ 1 Ilsc Pern;; t und~r t`i~ eond i t ions
imposr,rl, if any, i-rill nor be detrimcnl~l tc, t'ic ~r,,~cc, hc~~lt:h, s~fety and general
welf.~re ~~f the Citizen, of tne City of nn~lir_im,
7. That t:ic tr~ffic ~en~rated ~~y the nrnposed iise ~.~ill not imposc a^ undue
burden upon the streets and high~:~ays desi~ned and irnproved t~ carry the traf,°ie in
the are~.
~. That r,n one inriicated t'~eir pres~nce at said ~uhlic hearing in
opposition; and th.~t no c~rrespondence ~ias receiv~:l in ~npo,ition to the suhjeet
petition•
E~11tIROtJPIE~ITAL 1~1PFlCT FI~lDI~IS: Tha~ the Anaheim Cit~~ Plannina Conmission has
reviewed the proposal to permit a l;-lot, 1~-unit industrial r.~,ndominium complex tvith
waiver ~f requir~d lot fr~nta~e on a rectanqulariy-sh~ped parcel of ~and consistin9
of appror.imately ~+.G acres located at the seutheast r_~rnPr of La Palma ~venue and
Richfield Road; and does nereby apprr~ve the tlegativ~ Declaration fron the requirement
to prepare ar, environmental impact report on the hasis t~~at t'iere ~rould be no
significant individual or cumulative ac!vcrse environr~entai impact due to the approval
of this Fleaative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject
property fer aeneral industrial land uses commensurate ~:~ith the proposal; that no
sensitive environmental impacts are imiolved in thc orn~osal; that the Initial Stu~y
subnitted b~ thc petiticner indicaCes n~~ sianiricant inriividual or eumulative
adverse ~nvirnnmental inpacts: and thar. the iJegat:ive ~eclaration substantiating tFe
foregoi~g findinqs is on fiie in thc City of lnaheim PlanninR ^epartmr_nt.
~J(141, TNERFF~~R[, CE IT RESOt_l'E:7 tiiat tiie A~~heim City Plannin, Commission
does herehy grant suhject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upor, the following
conditions •~vhich are hereby found to be ~ necessary prnrequisite tn the proposed use
of the subject property in order t:, preserve the sc,fetv and general ~•~elfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the o~rner(s) of ~uhject propert}~ shali dFed to the City ~f Anaheim
a strip of land 32 feet in v~idth fror~ the centerline nf the street along Richfield
Road, and a strip of land 53 Feet in o-ridth from the centerlinn of the street along La
Palrr;a Avenue for street ~•~idenin9 purposes.
?. That all engineering requirements of the City of ~naheim along
Richfield Road and La Palrna Avenue, including preparitien of impr~vem~nt Pians ind
ir.stallation of all improvenents such as c~~rhs and gutters, sidFti•~a)I:s, street gradin9
and paving, drainag.~ facilities or other appurtenant o-~orE;, shall I~e complied ~•~ith ~s
reGuired bY the City Engineer ~r~ in accordance ~ii±!~ specifications on fi)e in the
Offiee of the City [nc~ineer; that street lightin9 facilitics along RichfiPld Road and
La Palma Flvenu~ shall be instalied as required hy t'~e ~ff~~~ ~r ~It(lities Gencral
'1ana9er, ~~~d in accordancc ~•~ith specificati~ns on file in th~ Offic~ of Utillties
General ~~a~ager; and/or that a'~ond, certificr~te o` deposit, letter ~f crndit, or
cash, in ~n a~ount and forn sati;factory to the Citv of ^,naheim shall ~e pnsted vrith
the City rr~ 9uarante~ the installation of the ~b~~.i~-;nenti~~-~e~! r~nuirements prior to
oCCUpancY•
'. That trcish storaqr, are~s sl,ai l he ~rnvider~ in ~ccordance ~.~i th apnrove~i
pl~,is on F~1e 1•lith the Orficc~ or t'ie Fxccutive ~irrct~r of Puhlic 4lorks,
_'_ ~r. ~ t -!~~
lE• That firc iiydrants =.hal) ',e in;rillecl and charged ~s reauired and
det'errnined to be necess~ry hy the f.hief nf t,ic Fire ~e~artm~n~ ~ri~r to c~nmencement
of structural frarr,inq.
7• That ;uhj^~t property sha?1 he se;vcd ',y imcl~r~rc~unrl utilities,
~~. That driina~c of suhjert ~rn~erty ;hall f~n ~lisno;c-_d of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engin~cr,
~. In the event tfiat suhjeet property is t:o he r~ivide~i fr.,r the purpo~~ of
sale, lease, or financing, a parcel map, to recor~i t!ie approved division of subjeet
Property si~all be suhmitted to .ind approved !;y t'~c Citv of Anah~im and then re
recorded in the office of the Orange Coimty ~iec~rJer.
~. That the original docum~nts or the covenants, conditions, and
~estrietions, and a letter addressed to devel~per's tirle eom~any authorizing
recordation thereof, shail he submittad to the City llttorney's off;ce and approved F.y
thie City Attorney's Offic~ and [ngin~ering Division, prior to final parc.el man
approval. Said doeuments, as approved, shatl.be filed and recordAd in the Office ~f
tl~~ Orange County Recorder.
9• That strect names shaii he ~ppr~ved ~~~~ the City Planninn Deo~rtment
prior to approval or a final parcel man,
10. That all private str~ets shall h~ devcloned in acc~rdanc~ !•iith the City
of Anaheim's Standard Detail No. 1?"l. fnr private streets, inclur!in~ installation of
street tlame siqns. plar,s f~r the private street lighting, as r~quirecl by the
standard detail, shall 6e suhmltted to thc 6uildin9 Divisinn for approval 3nd
inelusion ~~iith the :,uilding plans prior to the issuance of hull~'i~n permits.
(Private streets are those ~•ihich provid~ prirnary access and/~r circ~ilati~n ~•iirh~~ rhn
F~ uJG~.~. -
11• If pernanent street n~re signs havc n~t heen install~d, temporary
street name signs shall he instalied prior *_o any occunancv.
17., That the o~,~ner(s) of suhiect pro~erty shall pay ~npropriite drainaye
assessment fees to the Cit•;~ of Anaheim as determined by the City En~ineer ~rior to
approval of a parcel map.
13. ihat the orm er(s) of su!,ject nro~erty shall pay the tra`ftc signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No, 3596) in an amount as deter-~ined by the City Counci;,
for industrfal huildings ~rior tc th~ issuance of a buildin9 ~ermit.
14. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the ~ompletion
of P,eelassification IJo. G5-~~6-24, no~.i pending.
15. That suhject pr~~erty :hall be rievelone~i suhstantially in accordance.
~'+ith plans and sp~eifications on filc ~iith Chc City of ~1nahrin raarl:ed E;<`~ihit "los. t
through ~•
16. That Condition Mos. 1, .'., 7, ~nd 1-'~, above-mentinnec+, shall be complied
~vst~i prior to the Commencement of the activity <iuthorized under this resolution, or
Prior to the time that the builc!ing permit is issued, or o-rithin a period of one year
' 3" PC 3 t -l~E~
from d~te hr;reof, ~:rhieF~ever oceurs first, ~r suci, further time ~s the Hl~nnin~
Commission may r;rant.
17- That Can:Jition P1o;. 3, 5, G and 15, ahqv~-m~ntinnc~i, shall i~e eomplied
v~irh ^ri~:r to final buildinc~ an~! zoninq inspcctions.
~~~. Thar. nn retail or office uses shall he p~rnitted on suhject r~ropF;ty,
L'E IT FURTNER. P,~SOLt/Ep Cha[ the Ana'iein Citv Plannir,p Con~fssion does hereby
fin~1 and uetermine that adoptian of this P,es~l~iti~n is er.nressly ~r~dicatAC1 i~p~~
applicant's compliance o-~ith ~ach and ali of the c~n~litions her~in~,hove set forth.
Should any such eondition, or any ~art thereof, he declared invalid or unenfore~~h1~,
by t`ie final judonent of any rnurt of cnmpetent jurisdicti~n, then this Resolution
and any ap~rovals !ierein c~rtained, ,hail be rieemed null and ~~~id. >
THE F~RE ;01!1G RFSOl.~1T10;! i s s i~necl ~nd a~nrove;i hv me th i s'?rd day ~p
February~ '"?21•
!~~~ v'- ~i~~~
~ii.~~,,,r~~~ qrinG,rl'~ CITY'n~A~~,i~~~r. ~~~~.eISSIn~I
~1TT~ST: ~~ n
!/ ~ /
la ~' - J~a~t~t~....
SEC"FTARY, A':AHFI!1 CITY PL,1N~,1"Ir r;~~;~.~,~c,~~~,i
STATE OF CALIFOI;IIIA )
COUIdTY OF OP,A'1GE ) ss.
C ITY OF /1tlAI{E I!1 )
I, Edith L. Ilarris, Secret~ry of the Anah~ir•i Citv Planninn Cnmmis~in~
i
~~~r~:.y .:_r:+`y L;~~~ ~~~~ ~ur;:y~~in
the llnaheim City Planning Commis ,
„
u resoluti~n ~~as passecf and ,~~ioptcd at ~~ meeting of
sion held c~n Febr
2
'~%;
of the members th~reof: uary
i, 1
1, bv the follo~;~in~ vote
AY[S: CO'ih11$510•'lEfS: GAR~JtS~ ~01)q$~ [3USHO~F, F!'Y~ IiER~ST
I'I~!~
LI1^
T^
~
~lOES: C!?~1~tISSIO~~ERS: tdO;~E ~
~
.
ABSEr!T: CO!1'tISSIOtdERS: ~IOWF.
~t! ~JIT'IESS IJIIE",CQP, I
1
3 havc hereuntn se t r,v hand this ??rd c~ay of Fehr~ar
-
9
1. y,
~~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
SFC'ET!`~2Y, P1A!!rl~? CITY PL,n,`I~!It!!: C~MMISSIOh~
Pf°1-!i~