PC 81-5RESOLUTIOPI N0, PC81-5
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLA~JNI~-r, CO!1MISSION
THIIT PETITIOtJ FOR CQ~!DITIOtIAL USE PERMIT FlO, 21(li (iE GRA~lTFn~ IN PART
WHEREAS~ the Anahefm City Planning Comm)ssion did reccive a verifled
Petitlon for CondTtional Use Permtt from EPHRIAM BEAR~, ET AL, 1542 "R" Moulton
Parkway, Tustin~ California~ ?2F8~, owners~ and Jf~i!.4THAP1 WFRR~ c/o Forest City
D11~o~~ ~~c,~ ~~(,~~ San Vicente Boulevard, Los Angeles~ California ~Onqq~ agent. of
certain real property sit•uated in the City of Anaheim~ County of Oranqe, State of
Caltfornia, described as:
PARCEL 1: THE SOIITH HALF OF TlIE NORTHEAST QUAP,TER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF Tl1E ~JORTHEAST QUARTEP, OF SECT 10!! 23, TOblNSH I P
k SOUTH~ RANGE 11 WEST, IN THE RANCIIO LOS COYO7ES~ AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11 OF MISCELLANEOI~S MAPS IF! THE OFFICE
OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID CnU~lT1'.
WNEREAS, the Ctty Planntng Commisslon did hold a public hearing at the Civic
CeRter trt the City af Anaheim on January 12, 14£31, at 1:^y0 P.m., notlce of said
public hearfng having been duly givr_n as required by laar and in accordance wlth the
provistons of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditlonal use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recomnendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Cortmtssion~ after due inspection, inv~stigation and study made
bY itself and in its hehalf, and afcer due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said heartng~ does find and determtne the followin~ facts:
1. That the proposed ~~se is properly one for which a conditional use
pe~mit is authortzed hy Anahelm Munfcipal Code Section 1?,~3,n3o.~1~ to Wi~; to
permit an 81-lot~ 3Q-unit condominium suhdivlsinn (2~~ ~ffor~iahle) r~itfi waivers of:
A. SECT10-1 18.01.13~ - Required lot frontaae,
(Frontage on dedfcated street or
alley requtred;
private street fronta4e proposed)
B. SECTIOq t$,31,0~1,01y - Mintmum lot area per dwellin unit.
3~00 s uare eet requ red;
2219 sauare eet proposed)
C. SECT104 13.3~,062.~2Q - Maximum lot coveraqe.
D. SECTIOt! 18,31.063.011 - 111nimum landscaped setbacE:.
15- 0 eet requ re a ~ng Beach Boulevard;
10-15 eet proposed)
E. SECTiOtI 1t3,31.066.~10 - Mlnimum number and t pe of parktna spaces. €v`
2 0 spaces~ 1 0 enc osed ln a aarage required; ~,
2p~~Paces~ 134 enclosed in a garage proposed)
~
PC81-5
~'°',. ~~,.: ' _ __..~:_ _-.~:.s,...y.d.~ ~....,
~ '.
~
Z. That the above-mentioned ~~raiver C, is hereby dented on the basls that
subsequent to advertisemenY of this petltinn, revised plans ~•~ere submittPd deleting
the need for satd waiver,
3. That the ahove-mentioned ~aaivers A., B., p., ~n~ E, are hereby granted
on the basis that the developer has a~reed to entPr into an a~reement with the City
of Anaheim pursuant to Government Code Section 65~15 to provide 75~ of the untts as
low or moderate incrxne housing as defined in Government Code Sectlon F5~15 and with
appropriate resale contro)s as approved by the City of Anaheim,
~~. That the proposed use, as granted, aii11 not adversely affect the
adJoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is
proposed to be located,
5. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use, as granted,
is adequate to allow the full development of the nroposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the parttcular area nor to the peace, health~ safety, and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
F. That the Conditional Use Permit, as granted, ind under the condltions
imposed, artil not be detrtmental to the oeace, health, safetv and aeneral ~veifare of
Lhe Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
7. That the traffic generated by the prooosed use a~ill not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
8. That no one indicated their ~resence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was recelved tn opposition to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to reclassi y subject property `rom the CL (COMMERCIAL,
LIMITED) ZONE to the RM-3000 (RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE-FAMILY) 7.~NE to permit an $1-lot,
80-unit condominium subdivision (25$ affordable) with walvers of reoui~ed lot
frontac~e~ minlmum lot area per dwe)ling unit, minimum landscaped setback and minimum
number and type of parking spaces on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consis*ing
of approximately 4,7 acres, havin,q a frontage of approximately 33~ feet on the west
side of Beach Boulevard, having a maxtmum depth of approximately 620 feet and being
located approximately 330 feet south of the centerline of Ball Road (1241 South Beach
Boulevard); and does hereby aoprove the Negative Declaratfon from the requirement to
prepare an envtronmental lmpact report on the basTs that there would be no
signiflcant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval
of this Negative Declaratton since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subJect
property for low-medium residential and general commerci~il lanJ uses comrensurate
with the proposal; that no sensltive environmental impacts are involved in the
proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indlcates no
significant individual or cumulative adverse envir~nmental impacts; and that the
Negat~ve Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file i~ the City of
Anaheim Planning Department.
°2- PC81-5
~~~.. ...
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commisston
does hereby grant, in part, subJect Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the
followin9 «nditions whtch are hereby round to be a necessary prere4utsite to the
proposed use of ttie subject property in order to preserve the safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completlon
of Reclassification No. 80-81-21, noo-r pendin~.
2. That a o-foot htgh masonry wall shall he constructed along the north,
west and south property lines.
3• That subject P~operty shall be developed suhstantially in accordance
wtth pians and specifications on file with the City of Nnahetm mar~ed Exhibit Nos. 1
through 7•
4. That Condition ~7os. 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be comPlted wtth
Prior to final building and zoning inspections.
5• That prior to appr~val of the final map of Tract No. 1t364, the
developer sha11 enter into an agreement with the Cit} of Anahetm pursuant to
GovernmenC ~ode 659~5 Which agreement shall be recorded concurrently with or prior to
the approval of the Final Map and ~~hich shall provide that 2S$ of the units shall he
sold as ~~ or moderate income housing as defined in Government Code ~5915 and with
aPpropriate resale cont~ols as approved 'oy the Llty of Anaheim.
6. That in accordance with Council Policy Plo. 5~-2, "Sou~d Attenuatlon in
Resldential Projects", sound attenuation measures shall be provided for all dwelling
untts located wlthin 600 feet of Beach Boulevard unless otherwise approved by the
City Councll•
BE IT FIIRTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is exp~essly predicated upon
app~i~ant~s compliance ~vith each and all of the conditions herelnabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared tnvalid or unenforceable
by th~ ftnal judgment of any court of competent jurtsdfctton, then this Resolution~
and any apProvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
TNE FOREGOINf RESOLUTIOM Is signed and approved by me this 12th day of
January. 198~•
CHA I A, A~JAHE M C L NN 1 MG CQMM~ I SS I~1
ATTEST:
~.~.r~.
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY L NkING C M`1iS510N
-3- PC81-5
~~.
STATE OF CALIFORFJIA )
COUNTY OF ORqNGE ) sa~.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~~ Edith L. Narris~ Secretary of the Anahe!m City Planning Cammission~ do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was pacced and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Cammission hr.ld on January 12, 1qR1, by the follow(ng vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMF~ISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY' KING~ TO(.AR
NAES: LOMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSlONERS: BARrlES, F!ERSST
~~~ WITNESS WHER"cOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of January,
1981.
f0 Qd.Q, al • /YdiL~t.t~.a
SECP,ETARY, ANAHEI-1 CI ~ PLANNING COMMISSION
-h- PC81-5
R[S~11.U'fIC~!~ !in. pr;?~_r
fl RC-SOIUTI~'! !1F THE A~l~`,!IEI'~I CITY PI_!~'1N~~~r ~'1~~!11SS1!~F!
TH~~T PE?ITlorl Fn^ r~~~~plTl(1r!~L ~JSc PER~tIT rin, ~~r~, gr ~eP~~!TF'~, i'~ Pl+.~j
{dfiFRFA,, the Aniheim City Pl:vnnin~ Commi~sinn ;lirl r:,c~ive a verifi~~d
Petition for Conditianal ~IS~ Per~iit fmr~ (:P!i"I.~'" B[AR~~ F- ~f., i~l~~~ ~~r:~~ ,~~,ilton
Parl:o-~ay, Tustin, Cal ifnrnia, ~?G?n
Dillon, Inc., 11~11 San ~ , °'•'n~rs, ar<I .1'l~~!'Ti~;~r; i;iFn~~ c'n Fnr?st City
licentc Rnulevarrl, L~s ~nneleS, f.alif~rnii ~nnl,~ anent, of
eertain real pronerty siiu:~ted in the City ,~f q~~h~in, Cc~unty e.f flran~e, State ~f
California, ~ieserihed as;
PkRCEL I: TNE S01!TN H/1LF f)F TI!E ~In?Tf~[I1ST r)II~~TFr' pF TfiF
FlOkTHEAST QU/;RTEF OF T'tE ~1nRTHFn.~T ~UARTE~ QF 5[CTI!1!I 23, T~l:'~ISHIP
4 SOIITH, RA~lGF 11 llE ~T, I P! TNF R!'•.~fC110 L~S C^Y~7~S ~ A.; P~n !1~P
RFCOP,DED II! E3~OK 51, P.~r,t il nc !.~ISCELI.A'IEOi~c "1rPS I!I TfIE ~FFIf,E
OF THE C~I!yTY RECORUER OF SAID C^U!lTY.
WIIERFAS, the Citv Piannina Comnission di~l hol~l a nu',lic hearino at th~ Civic
Center iri the City of Anaheim on January 17, io~,~~ ~t ~:3~ ~ m
public he~ring havin~ heen duly qiven ~s requir~d h , ' ~Ott~~ °f Said
provislons of the Anaheim ~lunicipal Cor1~ Y~,L~~ ~~`' ~~ ~~~O~~~anc~ ~~!ith the
evidence for and anainst said '' CSanter 1~";,n~, t~ hear and consider
make `indings and reconmen~latioPs~i~oSC~nnectic,n~therrsi[her~n,{ ~n~i t~ ~nvestigate and
WHEREl1S, ;~id Conmission, after riue insrection, inve>tic~ati~n and stu~ly made
bY itself ard in its hehalf, a~~ ~fter due c~nsideration of ~)~ ,,~i~{F~~„ ~nr{ rPnorts
offered at said hearing, does .°ind an~i determine the f~11o~;,in~ p~~ts:
. ~ i~~c the nrnposed use i s nrnner Iv one fnr :.~h i cli a c~n~ i t innal usA
Permit is authorized hy Anaheim Municinal Co~;~., c~cti~n 1"',n;.n,r
permit an ,l-lot, ?~^-unit condo,~iniur~ ~ ~ rin r~ ~:'ir; t~
su.divisinn (,.r;• a=f~rrl~hl~1
~:~i th ~,~~ ivers nf:
A. SEr,TIn~~ ; u ~ n
- 1.13 - Rr:qu~rer! lot `r~ntaaP.
~Frnntaoe on cie~Jicater+ ;tr~et n~
alley requir~d;
?rivate strcet fr~ntan,• onos~dl
ft. SECTIO'! 1,;.31.^~1.~12 -~4inimum lot ar~a per d,.~~llinn
i
un
T.
3"0'? sr,u~r~ eet re~uired;
?_21~ sau~re eet nrnnoscri)
C. SFCTIO'J 13.31.OG,'..72r1 -!1ar,imum lot eoveranc,
D. SECTIqt! 1°.31.063.~~11 -,!inimuri l~ndsca~ecl sethac~~,
1~-2~ eet require~i ~Innr,~ 5each Roul~v~rci;
~~`~ ` ~
~~t nr~~oce,-~)
E. SFr,T~n~~ 1~.31.^,(.6.~1'? ti •
-:iinimum numher anr' tvne nf n,-rkina
spaces.
2~ 0 sPaces, 1~~ enclose~i in a aar~~e rec~uireri;
?(1
0~~~~~g~ ~?/~ enclnSecl in a n~raUe prooosed)
PC81-~
7• l~h~t the a!~ovc-mr~rtioner' rnivr,r ~. is herr.hy ~Ieni~~1 n~ the h~sis khat
suhsequent to adVCf tlSnRi~~nt of ti~is netitin~, revise~' r,inns t~ere siihmitt~rl deletina
the n~~ed fnr sa id t•ia iver,
3. Thit the ahovr:-mrr.tionerl ~:~aiver~ n,.~ r; ~ f1.~ i~~{ E,r,, !~~rehy n~anted
on Che basis th~t the drv~l~ner has anrce~: to ent~r int~ ~+r i~r~~~A~r ;;jth rF~P City
of An~heim pursu,~nt to G~vernment C~de Section !.rn~r, r~ ~r~vid~ ^~"~ nf t~e units as
10~.~ or modera te i nr.cxne hous i n9 ~s d~ f i ned i n f,~~~~rrnent Cn~!~_ Sec t i ~n ~"S~ 1~ and w. i th
ap~ropriate res~re c~ntr~l~ as aopr~„ed !,y the Citv nf Anahr_in,
~F. That th~ propose~i iisc, as nrnntrrl, ~•ri ) 1 nor a~iyerselv affect thP
ad~oining land uses and tl~e nrn~~th ind ~I~v~lnnm~nt nf the arAa in i-~'~ich it is
Pr~~,osed tn he lncate~l,
?. That th~- size and ;hane of t~c ;it~ rrnp~s~r~l f~r t`~c us~, as qranted,
~s ~dequitr' to allo~;~ the fi_ill develn~nPnt ~f ttie nr~p~~A~ usP in a manner nnt
detrimental to the n~rticnlar area n~r to th~ ~,eace, healt!,, saf~ty, an~ general
~•+elfare of Yhe Citi:~ns of the Cit~~ of Anah?im,
~• T~~•~t the ~onditicnal Ilse Per~it, a~ nrintP~i, nnd ~.~n~'~r the conditi~ns
imposerl, ~:~ill n~t 5e detrim~ntal tn the n~,~c, ~,-alth, sa~etv an~i ~en~ral ~•ielfare ~f
lfie Citizens of +he Ci~y ~~f Aniheim,
~• T~~,3t r.he traffic nen~rated hy the or•~~osed ,_is~ ~rj ) 1 nnt innose an undue
burden upon t~ie streets and hiqhtiiays ~lesinn~d ancl imprnv~d t~ c~~rrv the traffie in
the area.
d. That no one indicated their nresence at said nuhlic hearinn in
oPP~sition; and ~hat no correspond~nc~ ~~as r~ceiverl in n~nnsitt~n tn the suhjer,t
petition.
E~lVIROi1MENTAL IMPACT FIIIDItJG: 'That the Anaheim f.it~~ Planninq Comnission has
reviea;ed the pronosal to r~clacsify suhject
LIHITE~) ZOPlE to the P,!1-3~0~ (RFSIDFyT~JIL rqi~ ~'~"~'erty frnm the CL (Cn,MMF~~~qL,
80-uni t condominiu;~ suhdivision ~ LTIPLF-F~.tiLy) .n!!F to ~~rmit an ~'1-lot
frontane, minimum lot ar~a ~er dr~ellinnauni~t,~'minimumllandscanecl5sethackf'andrn~ininum
nur~ber and type of parl:inct spaces on a rectan~ulirly-shar.ecl parc~l of 1~n~1 consistinq
of approximatclv h,7 acres, havin~ a frontao~ of a~prnximately ~3n feet on the 4~est
side of Beach Boul~v~rd~ havin~ a maximum clenCh of ~n~roximatelv ~~~ feet an~1 being
located approximately 33~1 f~et south of the c~nterli-.:, of Ball 4oad (1241 South Beach
Boulevard); and do~s herehy anprove the ~Jeg ive ~eclar~~t~~ fr~~ the reautrement to
prepar~. an environr~ental impact report ~n *~ ~
signifieant individual or cumularive arivers~ ~n~,-~.-~,nn~nr'•1 i ict ~iiArt~ theiapproval
of this Flegative Declaration since the ,,;heim ~en,r,,~ P1~~ ,i
property for lo~•rm~diur~ resicientinl and q~,. - esi~nates the sub7ect
with the pr~posoi• r,~i r_-. ~;,1 I~n~1 usras c~mmensurate
Pr~posal• that ~ th~t no rSCIlSitive e.m~irnn ~I imnacts are invnlve~l in the
> t`~e (nitial .,tudy su!~mit*erl
signifieant inrtivi~iu,~l or cunulative Iv~r~r nn~~irnr,n,-. n~riti~n~~r inriicate_ n~
"le9ative Decl~rat(nn ci~;,,t~ntiatinc~ nt~l irinn~t~~ ~~~i that th~
the roren~inn fin.iinns is ~n f?lr in th~ C;±y nF
An~hei^~ Plannina D~n~rtment,
-'-
` ~r<3~-,
hlQld, THEREF~PF, f?E IT ~~'SOL!~F~ that the Anah~im City Pl~nning Commission
does hereby qrant, in part, su!,jecr f~etition fc,r Conclitinnil Use Permit, uoon the
folio~•~ing e~nditions a~hieh are hereby found t~ F~> > necessary prr~r~ouisite to thr
proposed use of the suhject r~ronerty in nrder t~ nreserv~ the safetv anci qenera'I
welfare oT the Citizens of t'~e City o` /1r~a~ieim:
1, That this Con~iitional Use Permit is arantc•d si,hject t~ the completicm
of Reclassification No. 3!1-t31-21, no~:; ~endira.
2. That a :~-f~ct hi~h mas~nry aiall sf~~l l he CnnSt~UCY.C•'~ alono thc north,
west and south propers:y lines.
3. That subject oroperty shall !~e de~eloped SuhSt~~itially in accordance
with plans 3nd specifications on f;le ~rith the City of lln~heir. marked Er.hihit Mos. i
through 7.
~+. That Condition Nos. Z and 3, ahove-mentione<i, sha!1 hr cor~plied aiith
prior to final buildinn and zoning inspections.
`i. That prior to apprnval of the fin~l nap of Traci ~lo, it;F~!,, the
developer sha11 enter intn an ~nr~Am~nt ~~~ith th~ ~i~" ~f q~a~Pim p~f~,iant tc
Governmenr Code ~5°1~ o-~hich aqrer_nent sh,~il I,e recorded c~ncurrently ~rith or prior to
the anprovai of the Final Ma~ and ~-ihich shail ornvidc~ that 2~%', of [he units shall he
sold as 104~ or moderate income houci-,c as clafined in f,overnn+ent Code ~~915 and with
appropriate resale controls as aopr~ved Fy Che Citv of ~nahc~in.
6. That :n accordance ~•~ith Council Policy FIO, j~1;', "Soun~i .Attenuation In
Residential Projects", sound attenuation mcasures shall he pro~~ide~f rnr all dwellinq
units loc~ted ~•~ithin ~~~0 feet of [ieach Roulevard unless o'herwise approved by the
City Council,
f3E IT FIIRTHER pESOLI~EG that the •4naheim City Plannir.g Commission do~s hereby
find and determine that adootion of this Resolution is exnressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance ~:iitti each and al) of the c~nditi~ns herelnahove set forth.
Should any such condition, or anv part ther~:of, be declare~d i~v~lfd or unenforceable
by the fina? judgment of any cour[ of com~~etent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein cor~[ained, shall I,e deemed null and void.
THE FOREG01^1G RFSOUITIO!! is sigred and approved Fy rne ttiis i?th ~iay of
Januarv, 1~81.
~
~~~~% ~.~~
Cf!A!R 1Ar , AtIAHcI'1 C:ITY L~!J~IIFf~ C~'".'11SS1~~~1
arrEST:
c~.~.~ ~ ~+.~.~-
SEC"FT.",~Y, A~1ANE iM C ITY PL/1'!t? i'l~ CO'~r~ ISS I^'!
-3- PC~1-i
STATE OF CqLIF'ORtlI!'~ )
COUNTY OF OP,A~JGE ) ss.
CITY OF ,~PiAHEIH j
I, Edith L. Harris, Secr~tary of tl~ic /1nah~in Cit~i Plannina Cor~mission, do
herehy certify that the fore9oinn res~lution aias p-,ssed and a;i~ptecl at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commission held or January i2, 1^"1, hy the fo7le~~ing vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: CQMMISSi~DIERS: BOUAS, BUSHORF, FRY, Y,ItIG, T'1L~°
PJ!iES: COM~11SSi0":ER;: ~IONE
ABSE"1T; COFIMIS510!IERS: ~3A~'i~!ES, HFRRST
IN tJITtJ[55 S/HEREOF, f have hereunto set my han~i this 12th day of January,
1~81.
~~ ~ /~Qil~.
cF~P ~-~/~nY, !lN.•^,HE I ~+ C I"y ul.~tiFi i h; ; COHM
ISSI~N
-~~- PC81-5