PC 81-60RESOL'ITIO'i 'I~. PC;;I-Fil
n rrsn~.~'TIOt: OF TIiE ~1flAil[!'1 CITY P~~^i~;~~~~ ~~r~~~~gSl~l'I
T!I/`,'i PETITIO'I F~~ CntlDITIO'~it~. i15[ Pf_R'tIT '!0. ; 1"'~; i3~ !;~?.ql!TF!1
41N,[RF.i15, t!~e ~lnaheiri City Plann~nn Commissinn ~lid receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Usc Pcrciit Yrer~ ~'1/11!EI" '1~TEL, L1'~., llt±enti~n Ed~~,ard Carl
Andres, 1331 East I;atella Avenuc, AnaheimY i,a)ifornia `?230~, o~.~ner of certain real
properCy situated in the City of ~lnaheiri, County of Or,~nge, State of California,
descrihed ~5:
PARCtL 1: THE SOUTHE~157 Qfl/1° i E.°, ~F THE SO!'THLlFST ~UAETER OF TH[
SOUTHF/;ST QUAR?ER OF SECTIGid 23, TOU~lSf'IP !+ SOIITFI, RA^1GF 1'1 'dEST,
S• ~• a• G M. EXCEPT THE W~ST 1 A~'E 71~ERfOF. ALS'l EXf,[PT T~IF
llEST 7_1}0 FEET OF TIIAT POP,T~p~1 T~i[nt-pF LYirlr EAST OF THE EA~T LI~lE
OF SAID IdEST 1~CRE Tf;ECFGF. l1LS~ FXCEPT A!! !~y~IVI')ED 14,C,;!n7'H~
IIITER(_ST I!! THE ;lORTfI IQ FFET OF Tl;E El1S7 S~ FFET OF Tf!E ':!EST 33F,
F[ET OF THE S011Tti~r,~T 2U.~^ •, E3 OF THE SO!IT!!':iEST ~1)A.P?E? OF TF~F
SOUTf~[AST QI)qRTFP, OF SAID SFC~ 10'J ?3.
llIIEZE!4S, thr~ City Pl~nninq Coa~mission ~ticl holc~ a ouhlie `~earinc~ ,~t t'ie Civic
Ccnter Ifl t~7e i.IL~ af Anai~ein nn 1~a~C!? ?jv i~;~~~ ~C ~;J^ ~.n.~ f10i1CC Of S~ll:~ D~Jb~IC
nearing fiaving been :1uly given as required hy ia~~ in<i in accor~iance ~•rith the
~rovisions of the Anaiieim ,"lunicipal Code, Ch,~pter 1^,^3, t~ hear and consider
evidenee for and a~ains*_ said pro~osed conditional use permit ond to investiqate an~l
makc fi,idings anJ recom^~enrlations in connection ['r~ere~.rit~~; nnd
WHEREi~S, said Com~,ission, a;ter due inspe~tion, I~VCStIC~;tion and study made
by itself and in its behalf, anci a~ter duc c~nsidcrition of ail evidence anci reports
offered at said hearing, dnes finci and d~termir.e the fol)oi•~ing facts:
,
• ~~~~~ Li~c proposen use i; properi•~ one fnr ~ihich a conditinnal use
permit is authorized by Anahei~ !1unicipal Code Section 1~.~1,~1~~,3np to ~vit•
permit a res~aurant ~•:it'i on-saie alcoholic ~~everaqes in the HL (Industrial, Limitel)
Zone ~ri th the foi lo~y~ ~q ~•ra iver: ~
SCCTIOI~ 1•"i,0(,,i)u~,.~?~~ -'linir~un numi~er of narl:inq spaces:
3~•i reauired; 2~,~ pr~nosnd
~, That the ~:rr • d:!aiver is '~nreby ararite~ ~n the hasis that the
proposed restaurant is locate~ adjacent existing r,~tel and thnrF ~;•i11 be dual usage
of 6oth restai.~rant and motel ~y th~ customer~.
j. T~~at the ~iroposcd use is hereLY 9~'anted sul,ject *_o th~ petitioner's
stipulation that the mo,t !iesterly drive~::ay shall i;e poste~l `or "riohT turns only."
~~. Tha[ ti~e pro~cse~l use ~•ii 1 i noC aclvcrscly affeef the acljoininn land uses
ancl [he c~ra•rtn and eeveloprner,t of tne rire~ in ~:,nic', it is pronnsed to be locateri,
Pf.i1-(n
~. That th~ ;i~e and shar,e ~~ the sitc pror,r,seci fnr the use is adenuate to
allo~:~ tn? full dcvelonment oi tlic~ proposci use in a rnanner no; detrimcntal Ya the
particular arc:a nor to thc pecir_~, ;~ealth, s,~f~tv, and generai ~~elfare nf the (:itizens
of thr City of Anahcim,
~~. Tliat the arantinr ~f
iniposed if 1 the Conclitiana~ Use Perr~it unrier the conditions
~ any, ~~~ill not he d~~trime.ntal to r.h~~ ne~=e, hc3lth, sa~c.~ty and general
welfare of the Citizen, of thc Cih~ of llnahcir:.
7• That the traffic ycncrated hy the prnnosed use 4~f11 nnt imnose an undue
burden upon the stre~ts and high~~ays designed and improved t~ carry thr~ traffic in
thA arn~,
~- That no one indicated Cheir presence at said pubiic hearing in
~pposition; and that no correspondence i:~as received in opp~sition to the subject
petition,
E~d1~IR0~JMENTAL IMPl~.CT FIPl~IN;: That the Anaheim City f'lanning Commission has
revierred the prop~sal to permit a restaurant ~•~ith on-sale alc~holic beveranes in the
?1L (Indu;trial, Limites) Zone ~:,it~5 tJaiver of minimum nunber of cark.in~ snares on a
rectangularly-,haned parcel of land con~istinn of approxim~teiy 1; ° acres, havtng a
frontar~r of aPproxinatel ~ .
maximun depth of a y 3'~~ f~et on the north side of ':atella Avenue, having a
l'!P_ST. of , PPrcximately ,.,5 fert and hei~n located a ~
t~ie centerline nf Sta,e Colleqc~ ;;o~i~ ,,., ~~' ~ximatP~y 1315 feet
~OFS !'=r^-t•Y approv~ the Negativ~ ~eclarati~n F vard (1,;1 Fast Y,~trlla Avenue) '
environmental r~~. the re~uireme~t to re ~re an~
impact report ~n the hasis that tnnre ~;p~i~~{ ~ p` ~n
i~lividual or cumulative adverse environnental impact Jue to
tJegative Declaration since the Anahei~ ;eneral p hP nn significant
~`'" a^prcval of this
for general (ndustrlal land uses commensurate 471Cf1,thC~q~np~~a~5 thn suhj~ct property
environmen*_al impacts are involved in the ~roposa); that the Initia)'Stu~iy Submstted~
bY the petitioner indic~tes no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental inpacts; and [hat the Negative Declaration substantiattn
findings is on file in t~ie City of P.naheim Pinn~r~. ~....__,...
9 t!~e foreao t na
.:...~ ,.~,~,~~.
IJOW, THE:REFORE, P,E IT P,ESULI~ED t
does hereby yrant suhject Petition for r that he Anaheim Cit~~ Planning foTmi55ipR
conditions t~rhich are here~~ f ondit(anal !)se Permit, u
of Y ound to he a neces=. ~on the folirn•~ing
the subjeCt property i~ ~r,~e~ ~~Y ?rr~reouisite to thP
Citizens of the City of Anaheim; t~ nreservc the s~f~ty ~~~{ Pr~'P~sed use
gencra 1 ~.,e 1 fare o` the
~. That the o~,mer(;) of suhject prnperty shali pay t'~e *_
assessment fee (Ordinance ilo. 3~~~(,) i~ ~~ a~~i~~t a~ ~etermined t;y the City Council,
for commcrcial bulldi~ S raffic sinna)
9 prior to the issur~nce of ~ h~~~~~~n permit.
2. That trash storagr areos shall he provideri in aecordan~e ~.~ith a
plans on file wich tfie Office .f the Executive ~irF,-tor n' Pi~hlic lJorl<s,
pproved
3. That the ot•mer(s) of SuhJect p~o~erty shali p~iv to the Ci
~ frz, in an amoii~t ~5 d~t~rmined f~y [he Clty Council, f,
hat~) l~ Avenuc, tY ~f .An~hei~n
rr streAt linhtinn alonq
i~. Tii~[ t~ic~ mest ~,>s~,tr:rly driv~tiav shal l he poste~l °nr ~~•ic;ht ~urns only~~.
-2- PC~°,l-~0
5. That subject property ;hall I~e ~i!~velo~ed s~~hst~ntial i in aecordanee
~aith plan= ancl specifieations un file v;ith the City of Anaheim rnarl<er Exhihit !~~. ~.
6. That Condition No. ~, ~bove-mentioned, sh~ll he cor+~li~d ~•~ith prior to
the commencement of the activity authorized under this r~soluti~n, or ori~r [o the
time that the buildin9 permit is issucJ, or ~oithin a oeri~d o` ~ne vear fron da*.e
hereof, ~•ihichever occurs first, or such furCher time as the Planninp Commission may
grant.
7. That Cor.dition tlos. 2, f!, ,~nd S, ahove-mentioned, shall he comp?ied
with prior to final huiidiny ancl zoninn inspeetions.
BE IT FU°7fiER RESOLVED rhat the ,4n~heim City Plannin~ Comnission !~OPS h^reby
find and determine that adoption of r.his Resoiution is e•xnressiY precltca±ed upon
applicant's compliance ti•;ith each and ail nf the conditions hPref~anove set `orth,
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared irvalid or u~en~orr_eabie
by the final jud9ment of an'y courC of comoetent jurisdiction, then Y.his ResolutEon,
and any approvals herein contained, snall ~e deened null ar,d ~~~id.
THF. F~R~r,~l;:~ RESOLUTI~~! is siqned and apnrevef hy me CF`IS 23rd day of
March, 1'?31. ~
,
/~/,~ r~~,C~ ~~1~.
C}I~~ I Rryt,f~, "~ifi+NF I'~ C I TY ^L'~'1', t ~~~ C`t""! ~` 10`1
ATTEST:
~ ~~~
SEC~.ETA.",Y~ A~!F11iEIM C1TY PLA'.!.'!I~iG C.^..".'11551~'~
STATE OF CAL I FORI! IA )
COU~!TY OF ORA"l~[ ) ss.
C ITY OF ~1:JatiE I`t )
I, Edith ~.. Harris, Secret~ry oP thc An~hcir~ Citv Plar,ninn Conr!ission, ~fo
hereby certify that the fore9oing resolution ~ras passed and a~onted at a meetinn of
the Ananeim City Planninn Comnission hetd on ~~arch 2?, 1~31, h•y the `ollo~•rin~ vote ~~
the a~erihers thereoP:
AYES: C6."1'11$$ION~ZS: BARt1ES~ ROI~AS~ F?.Y~ H[R~ST~ KII;~~ ?~LA^
NOES: COMMISSIQFlFRS: [3USHORE
AP,SErdT: CQhtM;SSIONEpS: t10~1E
1~31.
IN blITNE55 l•1HEREOF, 1 have hereur sek my hand this '_'ir~' ~iav ~` ~lareh,
~ ~ ~ ~ 'a~
SEC"ETARY, Ai14NFl`~ CIT'f PL~~~it!{'I" CO~~HISSIOPI
-~- prg~_C,~